The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies an absolute
frame of reference. Isn't that interesting?

http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...multaneity.htm
http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=902

Eugene Shubert

"Eugene Shubert" http://www.everythingimportant.org wrote in message
...
The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies an absolute
frame of reference. Isn't that interesting?

Eugene Schubert keeps posting irrational tripe. Isn't that interesting?

Bill


http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...multaneity.htm
http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=902

Eugene Shubert

"Eugene Shubert" http://www.everythingimportant.org wrote in message
...
| The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies an absolute
| frame of reference. Isn't that interesting?

No.
You presuppose a creation, and that makes it boring.
Androcles.


| http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...multaneity.htm
| http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=902
|
| Eugene Shubert
|
|
|
|

In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles

wrote
on Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:00:30 GMT
:

"Eugene Shubert" http://www.everythingimportant.org wrote in message
...
| The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies an absolute
| frame of reference. Isn't that interesting?

No.
You presuppose a creation, and that makes it boring.
Androcles.

And the alternative hypothesis for the microwave 2.7K noise is ... ?



| http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...multaneity.htm
| http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=902
|
| Eugene Shubert
|
|
|
|




--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.

"The Ghost In The Machine" wrote in message news
In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles

wrote
on Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:00:30 GMT
:

"Eugene Shubert" http://www.everythingimportant.org wrote in message
...
| The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies an absolute
| frame of reference. Isn't that interesting?

No.
You presuppose a creation, and that makes it boring.
Androcles.

And the alternative hypothesis for the microwave 2.7K noise is ... ?

A faint echo of Androcles' Primeval Fart.

Dirk Vdm

"The Ghost In The Machine" wrote in
message news | In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles
|
| wrote
| on Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:00:30 GMT
| :
|
| "Eugene Shubert" http://www.everythingimportant.org wrote in message
| ...
| | The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies an absolute
| | frame of reference. Isn't that interesting?
|
| No.
| You presuppose a creation, and that makes it boring.
| Androcles.
|
| And the alternative hypothesis for the microwave 2.7K noise is ... ?

The one that DOESN'T indicate any origin, you mean?


|
|
|
| | http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...multaneity.htm
| | http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=902
| |
| | Eugene Shubert
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| --
| #191,
| It's still legal to go .sigless.

The Ghost In The Machine wrote in message ...
In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles

wrote
on Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:00:30 GMT
:

"Eugene Shubert" http://www.everythingimportant.org wrote in message
...
| The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies an absolute
| frame of reference. Isn't that interesting?

No.
You presuppose a creation, and that makes it boring.
Androcles.

And the alternative hypothesis for the microwave 2.7K noise is ... ?

goddidit

[snip]

Eugene Shubert:
The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies an absolute
frame of reference.

See Hannes Alfven. He won a nobel prize. He had a similar idea,
except that his idea was based upon scientific principles, was well
developed theoretically and made testable predictions and he held out
on throwing in the towel, possibly until he died in the mid 1990's.
Needless to say, the idea was ruled out by the predictions it made
and that was not the work for which he won a nobel prize.

Isn't that interesting?

Why is something which is ``not even wrong supposed'' to be interesting?

(Bilge) wrote in message ...
Eugene Shubert:
The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies
an absolute frame of reference.

Isn't that interesting?

Why is something which is ``not even wrong supposed'' to
be interesting?

The opinions of mediocre physicists like you are worthless.

Note that physicists viewed Hannes Alfven as a heretic in
the very fields where he made the greatest contributions.
http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/cosmology/alfven.html

Eugene Shubert
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf

Eugene Shubert:
(Bilge) wrote:
Eugene Shubert:
The instantaneous creation of space and time identifies
an absolute frame of reference.

Isn't that interesting?

Why is something which is ``not even wrong supposed'' to
be interesting?

The opinions of mediocre physicists like you are worthless.

At least my worthless opinions have managed to get published.

Note that physicists viewed Hannes Alfven as a heretic in
the very fields where he made the greatest contributions.
http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/cosmology/alfven.html

You're as dense as the day is long. I mentioned alfven, remember?
You are doing just what kooks do. You've suddenly discovered the
name of someone who was considered unorthodox and without having
the slightest idea why he was unorthodox or anything about him,
you've decided he's an example of yourself. Not hardly. You're
a moron. Alfven wasn't.