![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: hammond, letter, open |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Hammond" wrote in message ...
"Scot McDermid" wrote in message t... "George Hammond" wrote in message ... "Scot McDermid" wrote in message ... "TMG" wrote in message news:Sf6dnRia-cOtUM3cRVn- Let's see your emails to him - cc the newsgroup. Science is done out in the open - nobody is going to beat you out of your Nobel. AFAIK, Nobel prizes are given for experiments. George is a theoretician and, as such, cannot receive a Nobel. [Hammond] What about Einstein... he never did any experiments and he got a Nobel Prize? I think you're mistaken. I recall that, in first year chemistry, Dr. Jones impressed upon us that a Nobel prize is for experiments. However, after a little searching using Google I found this http://info.ifpan.edu.pl/firststep/criteria.html And a quote from that site: [Title:] First Step to Nobel Prize in Physics Papers should be of regular research character in physics (physics should dominate in the papers - that refers to all the recognised competition papers, not to the awarded papers only). They should contain new, original and interesting results obtained by the Author either in theory or in experiment or in constructing devices (or instruments), the results should be presented in an appropriate way, characteristic for research papers. The papers should be ready for publication without any changes or after minor changes of editorial character only. So... it would seem that George Hammond could win a Nobel Prize in Physics if it is determined that his paper is worthy. [Hammond] Thanks so much. BTW, wher've you been sport.... haven't heard from you lately. Know anything about Bill Dembski... he's reading my papers as we speak.... said he'd email me when he gets through reading them. Dembski has a PhD in Philosophy among other things. (also a PhD in Math, and an M. Div. ... the guy's more of a polymath than I am) Not exactly a challenging standard of achievement, George. ==================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE 1st mirror site: http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god 2nd mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com new site (under construction): http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god ==================================== |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Open Letter to 13 Physicists | George Hammond | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | February 26th 04 09:01 AM |
| Open Letter to 13 Physicists | Dirk Van de moortel | The Theory of Relativity | 3 | February 5th 04 07:38 PM |
| Open Letter to 13 Physicists | David Evens | The Theory of Relativity | 1 | January 28th 04 06:32 PM |
| Open Letter to 13 Physicists | George Hammond | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | January 28th 04 05:04 AM |
| Open Letter to 13 Physicists | Richard | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | January 28th 04 05:04 AM |