Robert B. Winn wrote:

wrote in message ...
joseph levy wrote:

We now know that the speed of light is not really
constant.

Really? Where was this "relevation" published
in the peer reviewed literature?

It is erroneously found to be constant because of
three kinds of systematic measurement distortions
entailed by length contraction, clock retardation,
and arbitrary clock synchronization.
The Lorentz transformations, connect coordinates
altered by these distortions. After correction of these
the real transformations are disclosed, and the exact
value of the speed of light is brought to the fore.
The complete demonstration of these results is
given in the book "From Galileo to Lorentz and
beyond", reviewed and agreed by Pr J.P Vigier
Laboratory of relativist gravitation and cosmology,
University of Paris VI. Available at the publisher's
Apeiron web site http://redshift.vif.com, or at
Amazon, http://www.amazon.com
Your comments are wellcome,
Best regards,
Joseph Levy (Ph.D)

Publish this stuff, or **** off!

John Anderson

Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.

What is the objection to what I wrote beyond the fact that I told
the guy to **** off?

Do you think that physics papers shouldn't be peer reviewed?

That's a position that transcends any language issues. Stop
trying to hide behind that.

John Anderson

wrote in message ...
Robert B. Winn wrote:

wrote in message ...
joseph levy wrote:

We now know that the speed of light is not really
constant.

Really? Where was this "relevation" published
in the peer reviewed literature?

It is erroneously found to be constant because of
three kinds of systematic measurement distortions
entailed by length contraction, clock retardation,
and arbitrary clock synchronization.
The Lorentz transformations, connect coordinates
altered by these distortions. After correction of these
the real transformations are disclosed, and the exact
value of the speed of light is brought to the fore.
The complete demonstration of these results is
given in the book "From Galileo to Lorentz and
beyond", reviewed and agreed by Pr J.P Vigier
Laboratory of relativist gravitation and cosmology,
University of Paris VI. Available at the publisher's
Apeiron web site http://redshift.vif.com, or at
Amazon, http://www.amazon.com
Your comments are wellcome,
Best regards,
Joseph Levy (Ph.D)

Publish this stuff, or **** off!

John Anderson

Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.

What is the objection to what I wrote beyond the fact that I told
the guy to **** off?

Do you think that physics papers shouldn't be peer reviewed?

That's a position that transcends any language issues. Stop
trying to hide behind that.

John Anderson

The word peer has no real meaning in the United States at the present
time. Judges have been denying trial by jury since the 1960's. At
any rate, profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to become weaker.
Robert b. winn