"10of100" wrote in message om...
Muons are the proof that relativity is hopelessly wrong.
Travelling from the upper atmosphere to sea level, a distance of 50,000
metres,
in 2 microseconds means they are moving at 80 times the speed of light.
Relativity says they can't exceed c. Therefore relativity is wrong.
Einstein predicted: "Thence we conclude that a balance-clock at the equator
must go more slowly, by a very small amount, than a precisely similar clock
situated at one of the poles under otherwise identical conditions."
It doesn't happen. Therefore relativity is wrong.
You have no proof at all. All you have is your personal conviction.

Okay let's see,

Don't. Androcles is purposely criminally ignorant and stupid:
http://www.google.com/search?q=andro...ers.pandora.be
It will result in you getting a bucket of horse manure over your head.

Dirk Vdm

"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in message ...
"10of100" wrote in message om...
Muons are the proof that relativity is hopelessly wrong.
Travelling from the upper atmosphere to sea level, a distance of 50,000
metres,
in 2 microseconds means they are moving at 80 times the speed of light.
Relativity says they can't exceed c. Therefore relativity is wrong.
Einstein predicted: "Thence we conclude that a balance-clock at the equator
must go more slowly, by a very small amount, than a precisely similar clock
situated at one of the poles under otherwise identical conditions."
It doesn't happen. Therefore relativity is wrong.
You have no proof at all. All you have is your personal conviction.

Okay let's see,

Don't. Androcles is purposely criminally ignorant and stupid:
http://www.google.com/search?q=andro...ers.pandora.be
It will result in you getting a bucket of horse manure over your head.

Dirk Vdm

My mistake, thought he could be reasoned with, obviously not.
I never thought there would be other "Archimedes Plutoniums" out there.

"10of100" wrote in message om...
"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in message
...
"10of100" wrote in message om...
Muons are the proof that relativity is hopelessly wrong.
Travelling from the upper atmosphere to sea level, a distance of 50,000
metres,
in 2 microseconds means they are moving at 80 times the speed of light.
Relativity says they can't exceed c. Therefore relativity is wrong.
Einstein predicted: "Thence we conclude that a balance-clock at the equator
must go more slowly, by a very small amount, than a precisely similar clock
situated at one of the poles under otherwise identical conditions."
It doesn't happen. Therefore relativity is wrong.
You have no proof at all. All you have is your personal conviction.

Okay let's see,

Don't. Androcles is purposely criminally ignorant and stupid:
http://www.google.com/search?q=andro...ers.pandora.be
It will result in you getting a bucket of horse manure over your head.

Dirk Vdm

My mistake, thought he could be reasoned with, obviously not.
I never thought there would be other "Archimedes Plutoniums" out there.

This group is infested with Archiepoos. But they are worse.

Dirk Vdm

"10of100" wrote in message
om...
| "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote
in message ...
| "10of100" wrote in message
om...
| Muons are the proof that relativity is hopelessly wrong.
| Travelling from the upper atmosphere to sea level, a distance of
50,000
| metres,
| in 2 microseconds means they are moving at 80 times the speed of
light.
| Relativity says they can't exceed c. Therefore relativity is wrong.
| Einstein predicted: "Thence we conclude that a balance-clock at the
equator
| must go more slowly, by a very small amount, than a precisely
similar clock
| situated at one of the poles under otherwise identical conditions."
| It doesn't happen. Therefore relativity is wrong.
| You have no proof at all. All you have is your personal conviction.
|
| Okay let's see,
|
| Don't. Androcles is purposely criminally ignorant and stupid:
| http://www.google.com/search?q=andro...ers.pandora.be
| It will result in you getting a bucket of horse manure over your head.
|
| Dirk Vdm
|
| My mistake, thought he could be reasoned with, obviously not.

Reasoning means "See it my way", right?

| I never thought there would be other "Archimedes Plutoniums" out there.

That's because you cannot think.

BTW, The moron Dinky van de Torquemada claims

"This way sqrt is ALWAYS positive.
sqrt(4) = 2
-sqrt(4) = -2
sqrt(x^2) = x for all x = 0
sqrt(x^2) = -x for all x = 0"
==========================================
"John Baez" wrote in message
...
| In article , Satya Das
wrote:
|
| "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" N: dlzc1 D:cox wrote in
| message newsTHWc.21280$L94.4242@fed1read07...
|
| Dear Satya Das:
|
| "Satya Das" wrote in message
| ...
|
| If the mass equals energy divided by square of speed of light and
when
| negative energy is possible then doesn't it seem that negative mass
is
| inevitable?
|
| Actually, the correct formula is:
| (E)^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2
|
| Negative energy is a possibility, even with positive mass.
|
| It's a theoretical possibility, and historically it was very important,
| but there are good reasons for avoiding it.
|
| for the object at rest it is E = mc^2. Then the mass must be negative if
| total energy of the object is negative.
|
| From the formula above it's really E^2 = m^2c^4. You can take
| the square root, and at this stage most people choose the positive
| square root and get E = mc^2. If you chose the negative square root,
| you'd get E = -mc^2. Dirac did this when creating his theory of
| the electron. He then treated positrons as "holes" in a "sea" of
| negative-energy electron states. But, eventually it turned out to
| be wiser to treat positrons directly as positive-energy particles.
===========================
Obviously the moron has some beef with Dirac.
But you go on listening to morons, its ok with me. I'm only interested in
people that are actually capable of reason, moortel isn't one of them, and
it seems you are not either.
Androcles

"Androcles" wrote in message ...

"10of100" wrote in message
om...
| "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote
in message ...
| "10of100" wrote in message
om...
| Muons are the proof that relativity is hopelessly wrong.
| Travelling from the upper atmosphere to sea level, a distance of
| 50,000 metres,
| in 2 microseconds means they are moving at 80 times the speed of light.
| Relativity says they can't exceed c. Therefore relativity is wrong.
| Einstein predicted: "Thence we conclude that a balance-clock at the
| equator must go more slowly, by a very small amount, than a precisely
| similar clock
| situated at one of the poles under otherwise identical conditions."
| It doesn't happen. Therefore relativity is wrong.
| You have no proof at all. All you have is your personal conviction.
|
| Okay let's see,
|
| Don't. Androcles is purposely criminally ignorant and stupid:
| http://www.google.com/search?q=andro...ers.pandora.be
| It will result in you getting a bucket of horse manure over your head.
|
| Dirk Vdm
|
| My mistake, thought he could be reasoned with, obviously not.

Reasoning means "See it my way", right?

| I never thought there would be other "Archimedes Plutoniums" out there.

That's because you cannot think.

BTW, The moron Dinky van de Torquemada claims

"This way sqrt is ALWAYS positive.
sqrt(4) = 2
-sqrt(4) = -2
sqrt(x^2) = x for all x = 0
sqrt(x^2) = -x for all x = 0"

Androcles and square roots:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...anSpecify.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...es/Nearly.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Quadratic.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...es/GrowUp.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Tautology.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di.../Material.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...les/GIVEN.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...agoRescue.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...s/SqrtRev.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...s/NegSqrt.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...rtAnswers.html
Criminally ignorant and stupid


Dirk Vdm

10of100:

My mistake, thought he could be reasoned with, obviously not.
I never thought there would be other "Archimedes Plutoniums" out there.

Androsleaze is infinitely more bizarre.

lets see how unbizarre you can be
and give me tha isdn number of one
of yours numerously books you wrote