A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Refraction due to Earth's G Field



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 5th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
David Deyell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Refraction due to Earth's G Field

By doing a rough calculation I estimate the refraction due to spacial
dilation at the earth's surface to account for a 1.5 m/Km deflection of
incomming light.

1. Am I anywhere in the 'ballpark"

2, If so, how is this taken into account for long base interferometry? Would
not such a large difference in tragectory affect resolutions?


Ads
  #2  
Old September 5th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
David Deyell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Refraction due to Earth's G Field

Correction : Deflection should read 1.5m / 1000Km
"David Deyell" wrote in message
...
By doing a rough calculation I estimate the refraction due to spacial
dilation at the earth's surface to account for a 1.5 m/Km deflection of
incomming light.

1. Am I anywhere in the 'ballpark"

2, If so, how is this taken into account for long base interferometry?

Would
not such a large difference in tragectory affect resolutions?




  #3  
Old September 5th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Androcles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,055
Default Refraction due to Earth's G Field


"David Deyell" wrote in message
...
| By doing a rough calculation I estimate the refraction due to spacial
| dilation at the earth's surface to account for a 1.5 m/Km deflection of
| incomming light.
|
| 1. Am I anywhere in the 'ballpark"

Spatial dilation? What's that?
Oh, you mean refraction.
http://www.exo.net/~pauld/physics/at...een_flash.html

Androcles.


| 2, If so, how is this taken into account for long base interferometry?
Would
| not such a large difference in tragectory affect resolutions?
|
|


  #4  
Old September 5th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Aage Andersen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 78
Default Refraction due to Earth's G Field


"David Deyell" skrev i en meddelelse
...
By doing a rough calculation I estimate the refraction due to spacial
dilation at the earth's surface to account for a 1.5 m/Km deflection of
incomming light.


I get 1.39 m/1000000km

regards Aage


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Conformal Field Theory Due To PI OsherD Physics - General Discussion 0 July 26th 05 06:29 PM
Origin of Earth's Magnetic Field logan Physics - General Discussion 16 July 1st 05 12:29 AM
Energy in Earth's field Dirk Bruere at Neopax Current Physics Research (Moderated) 0 February 1st 05 08:31 PM
Strength of Earth's Magnetic Field in LEO? Paul Ciszek Physics - General Discussion 3 October 19th 04 11:50 AM
Earth's Inconstant Magnetic Field Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 18 January 1st 04 03:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Credit Cards - Loans - Credit Cards - Mortgages