"Floyd Baker" wrote in message
news |
| Hi... I tried once before with some limited success but was overcome
| by things over my head. Not necessarily unable to visualize, but I do
| not know the language you guys speak.
|
| So can I ask a few simple yes or no questions and work my way into
| this? I'll get a little more defined once I know if my original
| concepts are fairly straight. No qualifications now... g I know
| that will be hard but my questions are simple. I just want to know
| when I hit a no.. Thanks.
|
|
| When an object increases in speed, during acceleration, does the
| object 'shrink' in size, relative to a motionless observer.
No.

|
| Once the object arrives at the intended velocity, and stops
| accelerating, does its size stop reducing relative to the observer?

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.


| Does an object shrinking occur in all directions, as opposed to only
| the direction of travel?

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.


| If not, I would like to know why.

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

| If yes, is the shrinking the result of the object's atoms all
| shrinking?
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.


|
| Do they shrink because the electrons find a longer path, a spiral path
| instead of a circle, that is brought about by the acceleration or
| deceleration?

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.


| That is; during acceleration, don't the electrons still have to
| complete the full diameter of the orbit to keep the atom's properties?
| That is; (long sentence coming up) if an electron's path is longer
| because of the spiral, brought on by its effort to keep up with an
| accelerating and escaping nucleus, and it would therefore not be able
| to complete a full single orbit in the allotted time, because it could
| NOT go faster, it would in effect be too slow to maintain it's
| distance from the nucleus, so the electron would start to decay
| towards that center. It would thus shrink until reaching equilibrium
| again.
|
|
| Is this what causes the shrinkage in size of objects?

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.


|
| On slow down, does the same thing happen in reverse?
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.


| That is; as the nucleus slows down, the electrons tend to spiral ahead
| of it in the direction of travel, thus having to deal with a longer
| path again... But this longer path is what is needed to maintain
| equilibrium at the slower velocity which uses a larger orbit. So the
| distance of that path is 'corrected' from the spiral, back to the
| larger orbit that stays with the nucleus.

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.



|
| On the acceleration and deceleration size changes, is there some
| correction time factor?
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

A time that it takes for these changing
| forces to come back into alignment... What occurs or is brought
| about by this factor?

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.


| My end vision here is that there is this spaceship traveling across
| the galaxy and they think they're moving at near the speed of light.
| However earth viewers see the truth. They see a very much smaller
| spaceship that has created for themselves a galaxy that is now 100
| times larger. Earth sees the space ship traveling very *slowly*
| across their field of vision because this is what is right for them.
| The space travelers are trying to ignore the fact that the photons
| from their headlights *are* traveling away from the ship at the speed
| of light, where they logically should pile up in front of them. So
| *they* can't be traveling that fast. Their instruments just *measure*
| it that way.

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.


| In my mind right now, the faster you go, the further you have to go.
| You may become so fast, that you will become so small, that the
| distances will become so large, that you will never get there.
|
| Other than worm holes, warps, or whatever, am I in the ballpark?
NO.
Androcles.

| Floyd
|
|

"Androcles" wrote in message ...

"Floyd Baker" wrote in message
news |
No.

|
| Once the object arrives at the intended velocity, and stops
| accelerating, does its size stop reducing relative to the observer?

Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

Androcles is one of the regular crackpots on this group.

Martin Hogbin

"Androcles" wrote in message ...

"Floyd Baker" wrote in message
news |
| Hi... I tried once before with some limited success but was overcome
| by things over my head. Not necessarily unable to visualize, but I do
| not know the language you guys speak.
|
| So can I ask a few simple yes or no questions and work my way into
| this? I'll get a little more defined once I know if my original
| concepts are fairly straight. No qualifications now... g I know
| that will be hard but my questions are simple. I just want to know
| when I hit a no.. Thanks.
|
|
| When an object increases in speed, during acceleration, does the
| object 'shrink' in size, relative to a motionless observer.
No.
....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
Not relevant, the answer was 'no'.

....
NO.
Androcles.

Straight from The Man With The Vision:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...es/Vision.html

Dirk Vdm