The Source of Gravitational Energy

When one applies the correct relativistic transformations to the
gravitational field, the source of gravitational energy becomes apparent.
Unfortunately, due to a sophomoric error in the derivation of General
Relativity, it has become accepted that the relativistic transformations for
gravity a

Force = 1
Length = 1
Time = 1/(1+$)

Where "1/(1+$)" is the time transformation as provided by General
Relativity (GTR).

Unfortunately, the error in its generation made the mathematics impossible
of solution within the constraints of three dimensional Euclidian Geometry and
it took 18 months for a solution to be obtained. (The 18 months were not used
up in solving the matrix equation, as current writings would have you believe,
they represented the length of time it took for Dr. Einstein to adapt the
geometry of Riemann (which is based upon the faulty description of a straight
line implicit in all current geometries but which does not effect Euclidean
Geometry). In applying Riemannian Geometry , Dr. Einstein added the fiction of
curved space and added the spurious degree of freedom needed to solve his
equations. This approach was accepted by a conference on the subject with the
statement "why shouldn't we consider space to be curved, no one can prove it
isn't. (Actually the proof is quite simple and is provided in
http:/www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/gravity.htm). The acceptance of curved
space required a term for the curvature as a function of the gravitational
field. Surprise surprise, that curvature term turned out to be equal to the
term for time.

When one applies the legitimate rules of measurement (as would be required
in any of the more mundane fields of Science) and accepted and easily verified
physical laws to the study of the gravitational field, one finds it possible to
rigorously devise a different set of gravitational transformations which do not
require space to be curved:

Force = 1
Length = 1/(1-$)
Time = (1-$)

(The term "$" is identical with the equivalent term in General
Relativity).Testing these transformations against observation reveals that they
yield the same conclusions within the Solar Field and in comparison with
observations of massive and/or dense stars as does GTR to an accuracy well
beyond experimental capabilities. There is one important difference, however.
They reveal that the end result of gravitational collapse is not a singularity
but is a stable object the size of its horizon radius. THEY ALSO REVEAL THE
SOURCE OF GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY.

In an F(orce)-L(ength)-T(ime) system of units, the dimensional content of
energy is F*L. Since the gravitational transformation for length is unity, this
means that the gravitational transformation for energy is equal to the
gravitational transformation for Length and is therefore equal to 1/(1-$). If
we accept that the Principle of Relativity applies, the locally measured mass
equivalent energy of an object must remain unchanged as it moves to a different
elevation reference frame. In order to meet this requirement, the move to a
different elevation in the field the object must gain or lose energy in terms
of the units of measurement for energy existing at its original location. To do
this, a force must result as it moves. The product of this force and the
distance of fall is the energy of fall.

If we apply this process to an object falling from a quasi-infinite
distance to the event horizon, we find that, in terms of the units of
measurement existing at the quasi-infinite radius, the gravitational
transformation for energy requires shows that the object converts all of its
rest mass equivalent energy to kinetic energy. When it reaches the event
horizon and its velocity equals the velocity of light, the original rest mass
equivalent energy has become zero because it has been converted to kinetic
energy (all as measured with the units of measurement existing at the
quasi-infinite radius). In terms of the units of measurement existing at the
event horizon however, the rest mass equivalent energy of the object is
unchanged and the kinetic energy is infinite.

Since Relativity is all about observations made in systems where the size
of the units of measurement are affected by the elevation and/or velocity,
Dimensional Analysis is required to deal rationally with the process. Despite
this, I have received an E-mail from an individual who strongly asserted that
Dimensional Analysis is of no benefit in the study of velocity and
gravitational effect. The frightening thing in this E-mail is that the sender
is probably an academic busily damaging the minds of his students.

The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm.
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE
HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST
BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All Newsposts by this Website are available at
http://www.members.aol.com/postinglog/newspostings.com

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on a
regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy as
they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts, please
do not raise objections that are not related to material that you have read at
the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:-

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years.
In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE MATERIAL
PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by individuals who have
mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it. If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.