![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: experiment, ligo, work |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will the LIGO Experiment Work?
An ambitious experiment to detect gravitational waves from distant astronomical sources is currently in preparation (Laser Interferometric Gravitational Observatory - LIGO). A typical source for such waves would be two stars circling each other in close proximity. It is proposed to detect these waves by means of a two axis laser array to measure the relativistic effects of the waves as they pass by. It is postulated that these waves will cause the distance between the ends of the array, as sensed by Laser inteferometry, to be moved by the "distortion of space" as they pass the Earth. It is expected that this movement will be detectible by an interference pattern observable in Laser signals sent between the ends of the arrays. Calculations have shown that the gravitational wave produced by a massive star in close orbit about another should contain enough energy to be readily detectible by this method. What does not seem to be mentioned is the fact that LIGO is only capable of detecting longitudinal waves. In addition in none of these reports does mention seem to have been made of the fact that such waves must always be generated as multiple waves which cancel completely for longitudinal waves and cancel in the far field for transverse waves. Considering the distances involved and the size of the LIGO array, all such observations will be made as distant far field observations. The generation of multiple waves (e.g.- two for a binary system) results from the fact that, as is the case with a single gravitational object, the center of gravity of a gravitationally coupled multiple object must remain stationary as its component parts move with respect to each other. As a result, the gravitational wave (as seen at an "infinite distance") from one of the objects in a binary system will be equal in amplitude and opposite in phase to the gravitational wave from the other. The net gravitational radiation from the pair will consist of both longitudinal and transverse waves which are equal in amplitude. The longitudinal waves will be opposite in phase and shoud therefore cancel completely. The transverse waves will have a very small phase angle between them equal to the radius of the orbit(so) involved divided by the distance to the source. The transverse waves are only observable if the two objects can be resolved as separate objects (near field radiation). If they cannot be so resolved (far field radiation) by the gravitational wave detector, they will be impossible to detect because the detector will experience only the static field from their common center of gravity. The cyclical field which for which detection was hoped for will cancel. A further complication in the detection of the transverse wave is the fact that they will not produce a 'stretching" of the local horizontal, they will produce a "tilting" of the local vertical. The LIGO array should not capable of detecting the effect even if it has sufficinet amplitude. The longitudinal waves emanating from the center of gravity of the emitting system always produce far field radiation which cancels completely. An additional complication results from the fact that any residual component of the gravitational radiation is attenuated not only by the expected inverse square law, it suffers an additional attenuation in proportion to the cube of distance rather than the square of distance do the transverse waves. It would seem reasonable to assert that there are no longitudinal waves for LIGO to detect. Gravitational waves certainly do exist, we live on a world with an enormous gravity wave detector, the oceans. The tides in the ocean are produced by the Moon's gravitational field. The time of high tide advances about an hour a day. This advancement can be considered to be the output of a gravity wave detector, but, that gravity wave would be undetectable at interplanetary distances because the gravitational waves from the Earth and the Moon would cancel each other virtually completely! The writer has received arguments that the fact that binary stellar systems are observed to lose energy over time due to radiation of gravitational energy to the Universe shows that the limitation described does not occur and that gravitational waves will therefore be detectible. Such an argument is faulty. The radiating objects are embedded in the Universe and, as a result, all of the radiated gravitational energy is absorbed as "near field" radiation. It is only the shrimpy detectors that man is capable of building which will have difficulty in detecting transverse gravitational waves. (In addition to the expected attenuation in wave strength imposed by the inverse square law, the energy received by the far field detector represented by the LIGO array will be reduced in proportional to the square of the ratio of the orbital radius of the sources divided by the distance to the sourced. Rotsa Ruck Fellows! The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987), "The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm. EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS. All Newsposts by this Website are available at http://www.members.aol.com/postinglog/newspostings.com Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts, please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary. E-mail:- The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn. |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Will the LIGO Experiment Work? | Button | Physics - General Discussion | 8 | July 7th 05 12:10 AM |
| Will the LIGO Experiment Work? (#16) | Gnitadwq | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | November 10th 04 05:49 PM |
| Will the LIGO Experiment Work? | Gnimocq | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | October 5th 04 06:48 PM |
| Will the LIGO Experiment Work? | Evahuq | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | June 25th 04 03:53 PM |
| Will the LIGO Experiment Work? | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 2nd 03 03:45 AM |