Igor/Grichka a écrit :
Why should we defend it again and
again on internet? Because someone like YBM, totally incompetent
in our field, seems to be driven by the obsession to destroy us?
YBM works in computors. He received a specific formation for that.
But as such, he has absolutly *no idea* of what a quantum groups is,
nor modular algebras or KMS states. Therefore he should at least
respect someone's else work, even if he does not understand it.

I don't work in "computors" (sigh), I work in offices, servers rooms,
my own living room and even sometimes in cafés with a wifi connexion
to my network. "Computors" are terrible place to work : far too
small, too hot and noisy, and not smelling very well.

From the very first day when I posted comments about your "popular
science" book, you tried this stupid trick which illustrates perfectly
your arrogance and your hypocrisy : you tried to know who I was, what
I did at university, and so on...

Of course I refused to answer since my critics consist only on
pointing out pregraduate mistakes from your book (as far as I
know there are no higher level mistakes), your crap is sooo
obvious that I haven't to expose any universitary title to
convince anyone. I only had to *quote* you :

http://ybmessager.free.fr/docs/potpourri.html
http://ybmessager.free.fr/wp/index.php?p=2

Moreover, there is nothing there about "quantum groups",
"modular algebras" or "KMS states".

Remove my comments, only leave the quotes from you book and show
the result to anyone who did some math or physics at any university,
he probably doesn't believe that they're really quotes from a science
book.

Then you discovered I was working in the computer (not "computor")
science field, and with your superior intelligence you thought I should
have been "trained for that" at University. Too bad for you that you
didn't notice that a lot of people working on computers didn't
especially study CS... In fact, I can say it to you now, I've never
studied specifically Computer Science at university. I learn it by
myself while studying pure mathematics (especially algebra) up to
postgraduate level. "Surprise, surprise", as they say in Quebec.

Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"YBM" wrote in message ...

Dirk Van de moortel a écrit :

Indeed, that's an important. But every horse has a right to crap on
the streets, right? :-)
Since we don't have laws against lying and misguiding, there is nothing
anyone can do about it. Von Daniken is *still* around as well...

Of course there is no point in forbiding lies and mystification, there
is a point, anyway, in analyzing how such a quasi-hoax can find its
way to mainstream media. There is probably a french specific issue
here : I don't think that their communication plan will work in
UK and USA.

Who is Von Daniken ?


A very nice horse:
http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/informat...ken_erich.html
Sells a lot of books.

And still gives public talks (at least here in Germany). In the 10 years
I've lived now in Heidelberg, there were at least two talks. Both times
I thinked about going there, asking him some hard questions (and
essentially making fun of him), and both times I decided it's not worth
the effort.


Bye,
Bjoern

"Bjoern Feuerbacher" wrote in message ...
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"YBM" wrote in message ...

Dirk Van de moortel a écrit :

Indeed, that's an important. But every horse has a right to crap on
the streets, right? :-)
Since we don't have laws against lying and misguiding, there is nothing
anyone can do about it. Von Daniken is *still* around as well...

Of course there is no point in forbiding lies and mystification, there
is a point, anyway, in analyzing how such a quasi-hoax can find its
way to mainstream media. There is probably a french specific issue
here : I don't think that their communication plan will work in
UK and USA.

Who is Von Daniken ?


A very nice horse:
http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/informat...ken_erich.html
Sells a lot of books.

And still gives public talks (at least here in Germany). In the 10 years
I've lived now in Heidelberg, there were at least two talks. Both times
I thinked about going there, asking him some hard questions (and
essentially making fun of him), and both times I decided it's not worth
the effort.

Not worth the effort, and in the eyes of the public, you
probably would go down. These guys are *extremely*
experienced. And nice chaps.
I saw a TV-interview with him a few months ago.
Nothing has changed since 30 years.

Dirk Vdm

YBM wrote in message ...
Igor/Grichka a écrit :

. In fact, I can say it to you now, I've never
studied specifically Computer Science at university. I learn it by
myself while studying pure mathematics (especially algebra) up to
postgraduate level. "Surprise, surprise", as they say in Quebec.

Indeed. Nothing wrong with it, at the contrary. Which type of
algebra did you study?

Igor/Grichka a écrit :
Who is Von Daniken ?

You don't know him? Ask your old friend Dirk : he will certainly be
pleased to share datas with you.

He did, hours before you wrote this. You should definitely try to access
to Usenet by another mean than Google/Groups, you know ? Try finding
someone litterate on "computors", he could "teleport" a decent software
on you computer, called a "news reader", then you could configure it
to connect to news.wanadoo.fr. It is far more comfortable than any
Web interface, and you'd get messages in (almost) real time.

It is very surprising that after ten years spent in a theoretical
physics lab you didn't learn anything about the kind of software
and communication means which have been created especially for and
by scientists, and which should be known by any curious student
in math of physics fields. For instance : LaTeX and Usenet. Perhaps
you didn't have time, since learning what is a group is a extremely
difficult task (as you said in you book), but for genious like you
it is unlikely to be true.

You seem to have some kind of bitterness or anger against Dirk Van de
Moortel. Why ? His fumble page
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...alFumbles.html
provides you with a very good list of candidates for you "International
Institute of Mathematical Physics" (http://th-phys.edu.hk/).

And, BTW, he is one of the more educated in General and Special
Relativity to post here. Your cosmological "model" being based on
GR, you should be glad to meet such people. You could, for instance,
try to explain him how events outside a light cone are "not linked
by causality" or that "earth was twice closer to the Sun four billions
years ago".

YBM wrote in message ...
Igor/Grichka a écrit :
Several people asked you on fr.sci.physique if and where your
graduate thesis in science (mémoires de maîtrise et/ou DEA) could
be read. You've never answered.


We did answer this question at least 10 times.

If you did so, google lost mysteriously your posts. Could you
answer one more time ?

One more time I send you back to Daniel Sternheimer statement (march
2003) who (as second thesis advisor) checked all our diplomas :

"En premier lieu, pour les thèses, toute la procédure a été conforme à
la réglementation en vigueur,
appliquée parfois avec sévérité. Grichka et Igor Bogdanoff, chercheurs
non rétribués, ont été
régulièrement inscrits en doctorat au Centre d' Etudes Nucléaires de
l'Université de Bordeaux I,
en 1991/92 et 1992/93. Ils avaient pour cela les diplômes requis."

Igor/Grichka a écrit :
YBM wrote in message ...
Igor/Grichka a écrit :
Several people asked you on fr.sci.physique if and where your
graduate thesis in science (mémoires de maîtrise et/ou DEA) could
be read. You've never answered.

We did answer this question at least 10 times.

If you did so, google lost mysteriously your posts. Could you
answer one more time ?

One more time I send you back to Daniel Sternheimer statement (march
2003) who (as second thesis advisor) checked all our diplomas :

The question is not "did you have a graduate level or equivalent in
science", the question is "where could one read your « mémoires de
maîtrise et de DEA » ?

Giving answers to non-asked questions is one of your favorite trick.