YBM wrote in message ...
Greg Gerardin a écrit :
check the bogdanov's theory. it's extremely controversial and taboo but
strikingly brilliant (very intuitive).

In case you couldn't read their extremely "brilliant" book in french
(soon to be translated in english : poor of you), you could read some
excerpts from it, in english :

http://ybmessager.free.fr/docs/potpourri.html

Thank you for these kind comments around our book and your support to
our ideas as well. We are very pleased and somehow suprised by your
gracious feelings about our cosmological theory. And as you know,
dear Mr Messager, it's always a pleasure to read you.

In case you can read french, you could have some fun reading archives
of fr.sci.physics about this issue (the two "genious" themselves, with
numerous names, took part of discussions) and the special blog on the
subject (with links) :

http://ybmessager.free.fr/wp/

Again, it is very nice of you to "link" our ideas as a whole to your
site.

As we said, it is a kind of "privilege" to grasp some of your
attention and expertise. Thank you again warmly.

Sincerely Yours,


I/G

YBM wrote in message ...
Arkadiusz Jadczyk a écrit :
Why not "the Bogdanovs do really not understand what they talk about"
but nevertheless some scientists can make sense of what they talk about?

We have another interpretation for you :

Why not "the Bogdanovs do really understand what they talk about"
but nevertheless some non scientists cannot make sense of what they talk about?

Igor/Grichka wrote:
YBM wrote in message ...

Arkadiusz Jadczyk a écrit :

Why not "the Bogdanovs do really not understand what they talk about"
but nevertheless some scientists can make sense of what they talk about?


We have another interpretation for you :


Why not "the Bogdanovs do really understand what they talk about"
but nevertheless some non scientists cannot make sense of what they talk about?

It's a fact that there are quite a lot of people knowledgeable in the
fields which the Bogdanovs talks about, and these people think that
the ideas of thr Bogdanovs make no sense.


Bye,
Bjoern

Igor/Grichka a écrit :
http://ybmessager.free.fr/docs/potpourri.html

Thank you for these kind comments around our book and your support to
our ideas as well. We are very pleased and somehow suprised by your
gracious feelings about our cosmological theory. And as you know,
dear Mr Messager, it's always a pleasure to read you.

I thought you disappeared in some kind of singularity since you promised
some kind of response to the bunch of utterly nonsense I've quoted from
you book about a month ago, but you suddenly stopped posting in
fr.sci.physique (as well as "Yang", "R. Schwartz", and other ghosts).

It is a great pleasure for me too to notice you stopped using anonymous
proxies to post on Usenet. I guess that neither "Yang" nor "Schwartz"
will post sci.*. BTW your crap should be translated in english by now
(poor translators !), it is time to began a new campaign of buzzwords,
delusions and lies !

YBM wrote in message ...
Igor/Grichka a écrit :
http://ybmessager.free.fr/docs/potpourri.html



I thought you disappeared in some kind of singularity since you promised
some kind of response to the bunch of utterly nonsense I've quoted from
you book about a month ago, but you suddenly stopped posting in
fr.sci.physique (as well as "Yang", "R. Schwartz", and other ghosts).

Well, as you may not know there is a "real life" beyond newsgroups.
In Gers, connexions are not that easy. Besides I broke the screen of
my laptop. And now that we are back in town we have to deal with
zillions other things that are more urgent than the utterly nonsense
you mention. Anyway : we will try to post some answers some time next
week (although we might fail to do so).

It is a great pleasure for me too to notice you stopped using anonymous
proxies to post on Usenet. I guess that neither "Yang" nor "Schwartz"
will post sci.*. BTW your crap should be translated in english by now
(poor translators !), it is time to began a new campaign of buzzwords,
delusions and lies !

Good idea! We might even hire someone for the job. Are you
available?

Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote in message news:

It's a fact that there are quite a lot of people knowledgeable in the
fields which the Bogdanovs talks about, and these people think that
the ideas of thr Bogdanovs make no sense.

In fact all this discussion about our "nonsensical work" was
generated in 2002 by a rather little group of people who *did not read
and understand" our thesis and publications. John Baez, Peter Woit,
Greg Kupperberg, etc are busy scientists mainly interested in their
own field of research. Why would they care about our work and ideas?
In this case, the only opinions that we take in consideration is the
reports made by experts. These are official documents which were
written under full responsibility of their authors. They worked very
hard to produce such reports and certainly knew what they wrote (at
the the difference with all the "scientists" that claim everywhere
that our work does not mean anything).

Here is the link to the reports made by the experts :

http://igor.bogdanov.free.fr/Thesis Reports-I.G.Bogdanoff.pdf*


Thank you for your attention

Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote in message news:

It's a fact that there are quite a lot of people knowledgeable in the
fields which the Bogdanovs talks about, and these people think that
the ideas of thr Bogdanovs make no sense.

In fact all this discussion about our "nonsensical work" was
generated in 2002 by a rather little group of people who *did not read
and understand" our thesis and publications. John Baez, Peter Woit,
Greg Kupperberg, etc are busy scientists mainly interested in their
own field of research. Why would they care about our work and ideas?
In this case, the only opinions that we take in consideration is the
reports made by experts. These are official documents which were
written under full responsibility of their authors. They worked very
hard to produce such reports and certainly knew what they wrote (at
the the difference with all the "scientists" that claim everywhere
that our work does not mean anything).

Here is the link to the reports made by the experts :

http://igor.bogdanov.free.fr/Thesis Reports-I.G.Bogdanoff.pdf*


Thank you for your attention

I/G

Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote in message news:

It's a fact that there are quite a lot of people knowledgeable in the
fields which the Bogdanovs talks about, and these people think that
the ideas of thr Bogdanovs make no sense.

In fact all this discussion about our "nonsensical work" was
generated in 2002 by a rather little group of people who *did not read
nor understand" our thesis or publications. John Baez, Peter Woit,
Greg Kupperberg, etc are busy scientists mainly interested in their
own field of research. Why would they care about our work and ideas?
In this case, the only opinions that we take in consideration is the
reports made by experts. These are official documents which were
written under full responsibility of their authors. They worked very
hard to produce such reports and certainly knew what they wrote (at
the the difference with all the "scientists" that claim everywhere
that our work does not mean anything).

Here is the link to the reports made by the experts :

http://igor.bogdanov.free.fr/Thesis Reports-I.G.Bogdanoff.pdf*


Thank you for your attention

I/G

Igor/Grichka a écrit :
Well, as you may not know there is a "real life" beyond newsgroups.
In Gers, connexions are not that easy. Besides I broke the screen of
my laptop. And now that we are back in town we have to deal with
zillions other things that are more urgent than the utterly nonsense
you mention.

The fact that you published nonsense is not so important to you, how
could you illustrate more clearly that "science is not your concern" ?

It is a great pleasure for me too to notice you stopped using anonymous
proxies to post on Usenet. I guess that neither "Yang" nor "Schwartz"
will post sci.*. BTW your crap should be translated in english by now
(poor translators !), it is time to began a new campaign of buzzwords,
delusions and lies !

Good idea! We might even hire someone for the job. Are you
available?

Jokes as a last resort ?

Igor/Grichka a écrit :
[...]
Thank you for your attention

I didn't work in fr.sci.*, how could you imagine it will on sci.* ?