A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

Immoortel Fumble.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 24th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Androcles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,055
Default Immoortel Fumble.

I rarely read any of Dinky van de Torquemada's gibberish since he seldom
wants to discuss relativity anyway, but in a reply to 'Ghost in the Machine'
I happened across

Quote:
| That's elementary linear algebra...
|
| For instance, one (!) event with x = 0 and any t,
| also satisfies the equation
| x' = -vt'
Unquote.
Since Einstein defined x' = x-vt, when x = 0 then
x' = -vt, and not -vt'
as Dinky the Deranged claims, from which it follows that
t' = t.
Doubtless the spermless one will now argue that he really meant
chsi = x - v.tau
but of course I can only chuckle since the stupid **** attempted to ridicule
me over the same issue.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Androcles








Ads
  #2  
Old August 24th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Dirk Van de moortel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,355
Default Immoortel Fumble.


"Androcles" wrote in message ...
I rarely read any of Dinky van de Torquemada's gibberish since he seldom
wants to discuss relativity anyway, but in a reply to 'Ghost in the Machine'
I happened across

Quote:
| That's elementary linear algebra...
|
| For instance, one (!) event with x = 0 and any t,
| also satisfies the equation
| x' = -vt'
Unquote.
Since Einstein defined x' = x-vt, when x = 0 then
x' = -vt, and not -vt'
as Dinky the Deranged claims, from which it follows that
t' = t.
Doubtless the spermless one will now argue that he really meant
chsi = x - v.tau
but of course I can only chuckle since the stupid **** attempted to ridicule
me over the same issue.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Androcles


http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...esAtSchool.gif

Dirk Vdm


  #3  
Old August 24th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Dirk Van de moortel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,355
Default Immoortel Fumble.


"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in message
news

"Androcles" wrote in message ...
I rarely read any of Dinky van de Torquemada's gibberish since he seldom
wants to discuss relativity anyway, but in a reply to 'Ghost in the Machine'
I happened across

Quote:
| That's elementary linear algebra...
|
| For instance, one (!) event with x = 0 and any t,
| also satisfies the equation
| x' = -vt'
Unquote.
Since Einstein defined x' = x-vt, when x = 0 then
x' = -vt, and not -vt'
as Dinky the Deranged claims, from which it follows that
t' = t.
Doubtless the spermless one will now argue that he really meant
chsi = x - v.tau
but of course I can only chuckle since the stupid **** attempted to ridicule
me over the same issue.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Androcles


http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...esAtSchool.gif


Oops... forgot to mention:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...hlessBite.html

Dirk Vdm


  #4  
Old August 24th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Paul B. Andersen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,111
Default Immoortel Fumble.


"Androcles" skrev i melding ...
I rarely read any of Dinky van de Torquemada's gibberish since he seldom
wants to discuss relativity anyway, but in a reply to 'Ghost in the Machine'
I happened across

Quote:
| That's elementary linear algebra...
|
| For instance, one (!) event with x = 0 and any t,
| also satisfies the equation
| x' = -vt'
Unquote.
Since Einstein defined x' = x-vt, when x = 0 then
x' = -vt, and not -vt'
as Dinky the Deranged claims, from which it follows that
t' = t.
Doubtless the spermless one will now argue that he really meant
chsi = x - v.tau
but of course I can only chuckle since the stupid **** attempted to ridicule
me over the same issue.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Androcles


Nobody but the mathemagician Androcles can display
so much confusion in such a short posting.

Well done!

Paul


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This has got to be worth a fumble Eric Gisse Physics - General Discussion 1 June 25th 04 10:55 AM
What Makes A Fumble Immortal? Robert Vienneau Physics - General Discussion 48 April 7th 04 06:26 AM
An Immortal Fumble of the SRians kenseto The Theory of Relativity 16 February 29th 04 03:36 PM
#3: Another Immortal Fumble of the SRians kenseto The Theory of Relativity 3 February 29th 04 01:43 AM
#2 Another Immortal Fumble of the SRians GR_Learner@GR.grv The Theory of Relativity 23 February 28th 04 03:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Myspace Proxy - Bankruptcy - Debt Consolidation - Loan - Duwayne Burnside