![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: living, must, proof, relativity, wrong |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai,
YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? Maybe if the subject was "Logic has no place in science" you might have some kind of chance. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ballisticus wrote: Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai, YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? Maybe if the subject was "Logic has no place in science" you might have some kind of chance. Logic has a high place in science. It is how you derive predictions from the axioms of the theory and auxillary hypotheses. That is why physics theories are expressed mathematically, so that logic can be applied unambiguously. Bob Kolker |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ballisticus" B@.. wrote in message ... Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai, YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? Maybe if the subject was "Logic has no place in science" you might have some kind of chance. Get lost troll. Bill |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
B@..(Ballisticus) wrote in message . ..
Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai, YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? You present an extraordinarily compelling argument but it's possible that you've misjudged one or two persons on your list. Conceivably and perhaps coincidentally, they all may be fanatical, unreasoning religious relativists, blinded by their egocentric worship of the universe, loving to spend their time misrepresenting and distorting true science, but that doesn't mean that there can't be a flawlessly perfect version and true interpretation of relativity. Eugene Shubert http://www.everythingimportant.org |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ballisticus" B@.. wrote in message ... Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai, YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? Maybe if the subject was "Logic has no place in science" you might have some kind of chance. http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...hangeName.html http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...LogicBull.html Dirk Vdm |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ballisticus wrote:
Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai, YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? You are very unfair, I even published a good friend of you : http://zgub.homelinux.org/RH/Precess...pendencies.pdf Maybe if the subject was "Logic has no place in science" you might have some kind of chance. The kind of "logic" which make Androcleps say that : "The dog has v' velocity in the my frame (not as in any other frame, since it is not a lightdog) and at the same time v'-v relative velocity with the running moron Androcles, when measured in my frame". is ok, and that : "Light has c velocity in the K frame (as in any other frame, like the k one) and at the same time c-v relative velocity with the moving initial point of k, when measured in the K frame." is absurd ? Or the one which makes him pretend that "a xor b" does not imply "a or b" ? http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Gibberish.html or the kind of "logic" which makes another stupid australian (poor Australia) pretend to solve the 3-body problem with the crappiest 50 lines programs one could write in visual basic ? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:34:00 +0200, YBM wrote:
Ballisticus wrote: Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai, YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? You are very unfair, I even published a good friend of you : http://zgub.homelinux.org/RH/Precess...pendencies.pdf Maybe if the subject was "Logic has no place in science" you might have some kind of chance. The kind of "logic" which make Androcleps say that : "The dog has v' velocity in the my frame (not as in any other frame, since it is not a lightdog) and at the same time v'-v relative velocity with the running moron Androcles, when measured in my frame". is ok, and that : "Light has c velocity in the K frame (as in any other frame, like the k one) and at the same time c-v relative velocity with the moving initial point of k, when measured in the K frame." is absurd ? Or the one which makes him pretend that "a xor b" does not imply "a or b" ? http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Gibberish.html or the kind of "logic" which makes another stupid australian (poor Australia) pretend to solve the 3-body problem with the crappiest 50 lines programs one could write in visual basic ? Try it again, now. Henri Wilson. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm See how three orbiting bodies interact: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/threebody.exe See proof that light speed is source dependent. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
B@..(Ballisticus) wrote in message . ..
Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai, YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? Maybe if the subject was "Logic has no place in science" you might have some kind of chance. I don't think the word "logic" means what you think it does. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Challenging indiduals based on name without stating what the challenge they
have to address is kind of meaningless. John Anderson Ballisticus wrote: Van Moortel, Varney, Bilge, Kokler, Hobba, Evens, Wormsley, Anderson, Czuhai, YBM, Heymann, Smith, Old Man, Uncle Al, EjP...etc etc.... How would you like to pick a debating team from that lot? Maybe if the subject was "Logic has no place in science" you might have some kind of chance. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Anderson wrote in message ...
Challenging indiduals based on name without stating what the challenge they have to address is kind of meaningless. John Anderson Since you yourself are guilty of this, I see it as justification for why you are on the list. Eugene Shubert http://www.everythingimportant.org |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Proof that HUP is wrong | Schoenfeld | Physics - General Discussion | 29 | July 1st 05 12:06 AM |
| Chemical bonding inside living vs non-living things | bob | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | December 1st 04 02:25 AM |
| Why relativity is wrong | wespe | Physics - General Discussion | 35 | June 3rd 04 06:03 PM |
| Living proof of God | Proctologically Violated©® | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 3rd 04 10:07 AM |
| Living proof of God | Proctologically Violated©® | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 3rd 04 10:07 AM |