Paul Stowe wrote:

On Sat, 22 May 2004 10:38:57 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Paul Stowe" wrote in message news
On Fri, 21 May 2004 17:53:26 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"greywolf42" wrote in message ...

[Snip...]

And your technical contribution to any of these discussions is what Dickhead?

Talk about smokescreens... I don't think you've EVER had an original thought!

Talk about a shallow individual..., you're the poster child!

Guess:
What do Petr Beckmann, Barry Mingst, Ken Seto, and Paul Stowe have in common?

Each has demonstrated the ability to do 'original thinking'.
Each does (did) not make fun of others.
Each did not troll the newsgroups posting purely contentless insults.

and oh yeah,

Each has infinitely more class and social manners than Dickhead!

That should be enough for a start.

Paul Stowe

On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:36:55 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

{Nothing...}

Which is about as context rich as anything original contribution that
Wormley ever posts.

Probably a Freudian slip

Paul Stowe

"Paul Stowe" wrote in message ...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:36:55 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

{Nothing...}

Which is about as context rich as anything original contribution that
Wormley ever posts.

Wasn't that you who just cried:
| As irrelevant as anything else you post. Both to this topic and
| to any topic of physics which is what this newsgroups is
| supposedly for, and, the key topic of this thread!
|
| In fact, like the character Scar in Disney's Lion King most of
| what you say is both twisted and of malicious intent. IOW you're
| a very poor excuse of a person. One that can seem only to get
| pleasure out of attempting to demean others that do not hold the
| same belief system as yourself.
|
| Paul Stowe

Dirk Vdm

On Sun, 23 May 2004 18:10:14 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Paul Stowe" wrote in message ...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:36:55 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

{Nothing...}

Which is about as context rich as anything original contribution that
Wormley ever posts.

Wasn't that you who just cried:
| As irrelevant as anything else you post. Both to this topic and
| to any topic of physics which is what this newsgroups is
| supposedly for, and, the key topic of this thread!
|
| In fact, like the character Scar in Disney's Lion King most of
| what you say is both twisted and of malicious intent. IOW you're
| a very poor excuse of a person. One that can seem only to get
| pleasure out of attempting to demean others that do not hold the
| same belief system as yourself.
|
| Paul Stowe

OK, fine, fair enough. Point me to a post by Wormley that is not
just referncing others thoughts and ideas. Show me the posting that
contains any originality... I'll then be both glad to post a
retraction and an appology for getting it wrong.

Paul Stowe

Paul Stowe wrote:

On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:36:55 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

{Nothing...}

Which is about as context rich as anything original contribution that
Wormley ever posts.

Probably a Freudian slip

Paul Stowe

There wasn't much for me to add... your words spoke loud and clear!

"Paul Stowe" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 23 May 2004 18:10:14 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Paul Stowe" wrote in message ...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:36:55 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

{Nothing...}

Which is about as context rich as anything original contribution that
Wormley ever posts.

Wasn't that you who just cried:
| As irrelevant as anything else you post. Both to this topic and
| to any topic of physics which is what this newsgroups is
| supposedly for, and, the key topic of this thread!
|
| In fact, like the character Scar in Disney's Lion King most of
| what you say is both twisted and of malicious intent. IOW you're
| a very poor excuse of a person. One that can seem only to get
| pleasure out of attempting to demean others that do not hold the
| same belief system as yourself.
|
| Paul Stowe

OK, fine, fair enough. Point me to a post by Wormley that is not
just referncing others thoughts and ideas. Show me the posting that
contains any originality... I'll then be both glad to post a
retraction and an appology for getting it wrong.

I rather have a list of relevant pointers than original or moulded
misconceptions, even if they get published in Galilean Electrodynamics ;-)

Dirk Vdm

On Sun, 23 May 2004 19:57:17 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Paul Stowe" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 23 May 2004 18:10:14 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Paul Stowe" wrote in message ...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:36:55 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

{Nothing...}

Which is about as context rich as anything original contribution that
Wormley ever posts.

Wasn't that you who just cried:
| As irrelevant as anything else you post. Both to this topic and
| to any topic of physics which is what this newsgroups is
| supposedly for, and, the key topic of this thread!
|
| In fact, like the character Scar in Disney's Lion King most of
| what you say is both twisted and of malicious intent. IOW you're
| a very poor excuse of a person. One that can seem only to get
| pleasure out of attempting to demean others that do not hold the
| same belief system as yourself.
|
| Paul Stowe

OK, fine, fair enough. Point me to a post by Wormley that is not
just referncing others thoughts and ideas. Show me the posting that
contains any originality... I'll then be both glad to post a
retraction and an appology for getting it wrong.

I rather have a list of relevant pointers than original or moulded
misconceptions, even if they get published in Galilean Electrodynamics ;-)

Who is it you think got published in Galilean Electrodynamics?

Paul Stowe

"Paul Stowe" wrote in message news
On Sun, 23 May 2004 19:57:17 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Paul Stowe" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 23 May 2004 18:10:14 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Paul Stowe" wrote in message ...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 19:36:55 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

{Nothing...}

Which is about as context rich as anything original contribution that
Wormley ever posts.

Wasn't that you who just cried:
| As irrelevant as anything else you post. Both to this topic and
| to any topic of physics which is what this newsgroups is
| supposedly for, and, the key topic of this thread!
|
| In fact, like the character Scar in Disney's Lion King most of
| what you say is both twisted and of malicious intent. IOW you're
| a very poor excuse of a person. One that can seem only to get
| pleasure out of attempting to demean others that do not hold the
| same belief system as yourself.
|
| Paul Stowe

OK, fine, fair enough. Point me to a post by Wormley that is not
just referncing others thoughts and ideas. Show me the posting that
contains any originality... I'll then be both glad to post a
retraction and an appology for getting it wrong.

I rather have a list of relevant pointers than original or moulded
misconceptions, even if they get published in Galilean Electrodynamics ;-)

Who is it you think got published in Galilean Electrodynamics?

Ether addicts.

Dirk Vdm