"Mike Kent" wrote in message
...
Michael Varney wrote:
wrote in message
...

On Thu, 20 May 2004 08:32:34 -0600, "Michael Varney"
wrote:

SNIP

So, smart guy, tell me what Joan knows about physics. I would have
thought tree hugging was more her line. You're a tree hugger, too,
right?

You are an idiot. Go away.

That's okay, you don't have to be ashamed. It's not like you've
confessed to being a creationist. There are valid reasons to be an
environmental activist, even if some of your colleagues go too far
with it.


What is your problem idiot. Joan Baez is not John Baez.

You think she doesn't /know/ that?

Guess what ... You Have Been Trolled.

And I bet she is very proud of herself.

Mu-Pi (aka Bruce) was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
"Jacob W. Haller" wrote in message
...
Michael Varney wrote:
wrote in message
...

You're as bad as George Hammond if you think Joan knows **** about
physics.

You are an idiot. Go away.

Why are you telling barbara to leave alt.religion.kibology? Where would
you have her go?

Elsewhere. Ignorant twits like her should not infest Usenet.

Her? Barbara is not a "Her".

--
TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/
Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function.
You're saying cats are the opposite of bijectiveness?
-- ST in RHOD

wrote:
In article , wrote:
On 20 May 2004 04:57:41 -0700, (Aleksandr
Timofeev) wrote:

I can not understand logic of the colleagues John Baez and Joseph
Lazio...

I hate to tell you braniacs this, but Joan Baez

I hate to tell you this but the _man_ in the subject line
does know about physics.

Joan Baez knows Jack Sarfatti, who may know something about
physics, but has yet to allow it to color his writing.

--Blair
"There's a looping structure in there."

On Thu, 20 May 2004 23:47:31 -0600, "Michael Varney"
wrote:


"Mike Kent" wrote in message
...
Michael Varney wrote:
wrote in message
...

On Thu, 20 May 2004 08:32:34 -0600, "Michael Varney"
wrote:

SNIP

So, smart guy, tell me what Joan knows about physics. I would have
thought tree hugging was more her line. You're a tree hugger, too,
right?

You are an idiot. Go away.

That's okay, you don't have to be ashamed. It's not like you've
confessed to being a creationist. There are valid reasons to be an
environmental activist, even if some of your colleagues go too far
with it.


What is your problem idiot. Joan Baez is not John Baez.

You think she doesn't /know/ that?

Guess what ... You Have Been Trolled.

And I bet she is very proud of herself.


Well, I'm certainly proud of her. What's this make, the second or
third time you've been trolled by a Kibologist? I would have thought
Barb's job would be all the more difficult, given your intimate
familiarity with the barbed hook.

There's a pattern here. A BIG-BRANED guy like you ought to be able to
spot it.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho
"Who put these fingerprints on my imagination?"

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 May 2004 23:47:31 -0600, "Michael Varney"
wrote:


"Mike Kent" wrote in message
...
Michael Varney wrote:
wrote in message
...

On Thu, 20 May 2004 08:32:34 -0600, "Michael Varney"
wrote:

SNIP

So, smart guy, tell me what Joan knows about physics. I would have
thought tree hugging was more her line. You're a tree hugger,
too,
right?

You are an idiot. Go away.

That's okay, you don't have to be ashamed. It's not like you've
confessed to being a creationist. There are valid reasons to be an
environmental activist, even if some of your colleagues go too far
with it.


What is your problem idiot. Joan Baez is not John Baez.

You think she doesn't /know/ that?

Guess what ... You Have Been Trolled.

And I bet she is very proud of herself.


Well, I'm certainly proud of her. What's this make, the second or
third time you've been trolled by a Kibologist?

What is funny is that Kibo-Dolts take Trolling as a sign of virility. LOL!

wrote in message
...
SNIP

I suspect he thought that, as a mere GURL (or so he believes on no
evidence but my e-mail address),

If you wish you were a girl, then who am I to stop you?

I am by definition too dumm to have
good reading comprehension and too dumm to be able to set a hook that
he would bite on so hard and run out so far.

That says much more about you than about I.

Clearly, he understands exactly squat about the scientific method.

Really? *smirk*

And not a great deal about Usenet.

Well, you keep having fun trolling, I will will continue to have fun
acomplishing somthing with my life. :-)


OTOH, he does learn eventually, if slowly. He has managed to keep his
mouth shut about his unhealthy interest in what happened between Joan
and her father, once he realized that trying to defend it would just
make him look worse.

Make me look worse, when it was you spewing ignorance? Oh well, that is the
trollers logic for you.

"Michael Varney" writes:

wrote in message
...
SNIP

I suspect he thought that, as a mere GURL (or so he believes on no
evidence but my e-mail address),

If you wish you were a girl, then who am I to stop you?

You are arguing beyond your data, which equally supports the
hypothesis of a wish to be a syllogism.

Lee Rudolph

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 09:14:27 -0600, "Michael Varney"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
SNIP

I suspect he thought that, as a mere GURL (or so he believes on no
evidence but my e-mail address),

If you wish you were a girl, then who am I to stop you?

I am by definition too dumm to have
good reading comprehension and too dumm to be able to set a hook that
he would bite on so hard and run out so far.

That says much more about you than about I.

Clearly, he understands exactly squat about the scientific method.

Really? *smirk*

Absolutely. In this exchange, you have ignored almost every tenet.

Really?


And not a great deal about Usenet.

Well, you keep having fun trolling, I will will continue to have fun
acomplishing somthing with my life. :-)

Such as spending at least as much time writing patronizing posts to
Usenet as I spent trolling you? I guess if that makes you feel a
sense of accomplishment, then it has indeed accomplished something.

Oh... so that is what gets your goat. Patronizing posts. I knew there was
a reason for your idiocy.

OTOH, he does learn eventually, if slowly. He has managed to keep his
mouth shut about his unhealthy interest in what happened between Joan
and her father, once he realized that trying to defend it would just
make him look worse.

Make me look worse, when it was you spewing ignorance? Oh well, that is
the
trollers logic for you.

Wow, you really do have a weak grasp on logic.

Quit projecting.

No wonder you show
that lovely combination of arrogance and gullibility.

Perhaps I am gullible. Does that make you feel better? Oh.. of course it
does... you are a troll after all.
*smirk*

On Sat, 22 May 2004 09:11:23 -0600, "Michael Varney"
wrote:

What is funny is that Kibo-Dolts take Trolling as a sign of virility.

Yeah, that Barbara is just a walking vat of testosterone.

LOL!

This ain't an AOL chat room, Chuckles. And stop mucking with
FOLLOWUP-TO. Your lameness deserves a larger audience.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho
"Who put these fingerprints on my imagination?"

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Sat, 22 May 2004 09:11:23 -0600, "Michael Varney"
wrote:

What is funny is that Kibo-Dolts take Trolling as a sign of virility.

Yeah, that Barbara is just a walking vat of testosterone.

LOL!

This ain't an AOL chat room, Chuckles. And stop mucking with
FOLLOWUP-TO. Your lameness deserves a larger audience.

Hi Kevin.

If there's any one thing Varney is actually very good at
it is wriggling. It looks like you might be here a while. LOL