A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

under Peer Review in JHEP or Physical Review D??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 18th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
K_Loupspeed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default under Peer Review in JHEP or Physical Review D??

well this is a complement to my last message...the work is now
terminated and was sent to one of these journals..i will not tell if
is JHEP or Physical Review D(perhaps referees are watching sci-physics
hmmmm i doubt).

at this time the first "attack wave" returned...version 1 is a
upgraded version of the file mywork.pdf in
http://www.geocities.com/loupspeed

i linked Kalbermann-Halevi to ADDK Dark Matter model...

first "corrections" the terms "hyperdrive" or "space drive" yeah
right..i am in TeX of version 2 to be resubmitted...well i am giving
troubles to the editorial office...there are lots of emails....i dont
like much the vocabulary of the "Conventional
Physics"..."Chern-Simmons Fermions decayment in chirality of a
Calabi-Yau manyfold in the formalism of Horawa-Witten SU2 X U1
symmetry breaking in Standard Model with CPT violations or whatever.in
Kaluza-Klein modes for the Large hadron Collider..in Lattice QCD?????
pffffff." etcetera...i was brough to physics due to my passion for
faster than light space travel...not the hiearchy scale of 1 tev
against 10^16 Tev..well this is another relief of a hard day
work...but i dont care...the Chicago Engineering Society a Century ago
told that Orville Wright was a crackpot...when i read a "credible"
journal well i feel the physics as a "dry" science....lack the spirit
of pioneer of NASA Marc Millis and the NASA Breakthrough Propulsion
Physics Program....for example articles of "telleparallelism of
transport of a teleparallell Weyl Tensor in the Schwarzchild Black
Hole"..

well guys thank you for this little but lovely time...i must relief
myself for a while and have some fun...it is important to be published
in a REAL GOOD peer review journal....not the journal of the
crackpot..although i would rather prefer crackpot than conventional
physics..
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are Scientific Journals Passe? Has Peer Review Become Sneer Review? Do Scientists Steal From Submitted Papers? Is the Internet The New Way? MDT Rock On!! greatbooksclassics@yahoo.com Physics - General Discussion 48 August 6th 05 08:35 AM
My paper passed peer review James Harris Physics - General Discussion 59 May 27th 04 08:33 PM
My paper passed peer review Charlie-Boo Physics - General Discussion 6 May 20th 04 09:42 PM
My paper passed peer review jmfbahciv@aol.com Physics - General Discussion 4 May 20th 04 05:49 PM
Peer Review works amazingly well greywolf42 Physics - General Discussion 0 July 1st 03 07:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Debt Consolidation - Advertising - Debt Consolidation - Credit Cards - Problem Mortgage