A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Negative vacuum energy density and GR



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 12th 04 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Ed Keane III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 371
Default Negative vacuum energy density and GR

If vacuum had a negative energy density would this cause
the curvature of the inside of a sphere to not be flat?

What would the observable astronomical effects of a
negative vacuum energy density be? Could it create
voids? Could it effect the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuz'min
cutoff or accelerate cosmic rays formed in intergalactic
voids? Would it effect orbital periods?

I am aware that astronomical observations say the
energy density is close to zero. I am wondering how
they would differ if it were negative.


Ads
  #2  
Old May 12th 04 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Old Man
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,474
Default Negative vacuum energy density and GR


"Ed Keane III" wrote in message
. ..
If vacuum had a negative energy density would this cause
the curvature of the inside of a sphere to not be flat?

What would the observable astronomical effects of a
negative vacuum energy density be? Could it create
voids? Could it effect the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuz'min
cutoff or accelerate cosmic rays formed in intergalactic
voids? Would it effect orbital periods?

I am aware that astronomical observations say the
energy density is close to zero. I am wondering how
they would differ if it were negative.


The cosmological constant represents a net constant
negative energy density. Consider a Universe with a
pure cosmological constant, A, and nothing else: we
get "de Sitter's solution"

a(t) = exp(H t), H = sqrt(A / 3)

wherein space expands exponentially with time; Hubble's
constant, H, is truly independent of time; the age of the
Universe is infinite (present time, a = 1 at t = 0). See

"Principles of Physical Cosmology" by P.J.E. Peebles

[Old Man]


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Negative vacuum energy density and GR Ed Keane III Physics - General Discussion 1 May 12th 04 10:09 PM
Astronomical effects of negative vacuum energy density Ed Keane III Physics - General Discussion 4 April 15th 04 08:13 PM
Astronomical effects of negative vacuum energy density Ed Keane III The Theory of Relativity 2 April 15th 04 08:13 PM
Astronomical effects of negative vacuum energy density Ed Keane III Physics - General Discussion 0 April 15th 04 07:16 PM
Negative vacuum energy and curvature Ed Keane III The Theory of Relativity 1 April 15th 04 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Car Finance - Debt Consolidation - Xecuter 3 Mod Chip - Mortgage Calculator