Recently got the book on recommendation of Mati Meron. I just want to say
it is a fabulous little book - not quite up their with Landau - but close.
It weaves the interconnections between classical and quantum mechanics and
QFT theory like no other I have found. Great insights all the way through -
such as why we need the operator formalism of QFT (the reason is it allows
an out to the acasualty problems of SR applied to the Feynamn formalism -
reinterpreting it as a non local operator immediately solves the problem and
since we know from the cluster decomposition property this is possible it
works).

Good one Mati

Thanks
Bill

Hi Bill:
Can't seem to locate this title or author on book links. Could you provide
the ISBN? Thanks.
Eli Botkin

"Bill Hobba" wrote in message
...
Recently got the book on recommendation of Mati Meron. I just want to say
it is a fabulous little book - not quite up their with Landau - but close.
It weaves the interconnections between classical and quantum mechanics and
QFT theory like no other I have found. Great insights all the way
through -
such as why we need the operator formalism of QFT (the reason is it allows
an out to the acasualty problems of SR applied to the Feynamn formalism -
reinterpreting it as a non local operator immediately solves the problem
and
since we know from the cluster decomposition property this is possible it
works).

Good one Mati

Thanks
Bill

"Bill Hobba" wrote in message
...
Recently got the book on recommendation of Mati Meron. I just want to say
it is a fabulous little book - not quite up their with Landau - but close.
It weaves the interconnections between classical and quantum mechanics and
QFT theory like no other I have found. Great insights all the way
through -
such as why we need the operator formalism of QFT (the reason is it allows
an out to the acasualty problems of SR applied to the Feynamn formalism -
reinterpreting it as a non local operator immediately solves the problem
and
since we know from the cluster decomposition property this is possible it
works).

Good one Mati

Thanks
Bill
Good 'ole Feynamn ... Never heard of her.
Androcles

"Eli Botkin" wrote in message
s.com...
Hi Bill:
Can't seem to locate this title or author on book links. Could you
provide
the ISBN? Thanks.

Sorry Ed - I have the book in front of me - but it does not seem to have one
(I am sure it does but it is not printed in the book). The best I can do is
a library of congress card number - 65-18441.

It is available second hand from Amazon so they may be able to get the ISBN
from the above number. It is quite cheap though - my copy was only $35.

Sorry
Bill

Bill Hobba wrote:
Recently got the book on recommendation of Mati Meron. I just want to say
it is a fabulous little book - not quite up their with Landau - but close.
It weaves the interconnections between classical and quantum mechanics and
QFT theory like no other I have found. Great insights all the way through -
such as why we need the operator formalism of QFT (the reason is it allows
an out to the acasualty problems of SR applied to the Feynamn formalism -
reinterpreting it as a non local operator immediately solves the problem and
since we know from the cluster decomposition property this is possible it
works).'

Androcles replied:
Feynamn ... Never heard of her.

As I said the last time I made the same typo - it is a fact I am eternally
grateful for as it would mean there is a chance of you breeding - what a
discussing thought. Those that judge on form rather than content are
displaying one of the weakest of all human fragilities - for it is an
indication they do not understand the content yet do not want to appear
stupid by saying nothing. However the subterfuge was transparent when I
caught onto it at work and is just as transparent when you use it.

Thanks
Bill

"Bill Hobba" wrote in message
...

"Eli Botkin" wrote in message
s.com...
Hi Bill:
Can't seem to locate this title or author on book links. Could you
provide
the ISBN? Thanks.

Sorry Ed - I have the book in front of me - but it does not seem to have
one
(I am sure it does but it is not printed in the book). The best I can do
is
a library of congress card number - 65-18441.

It is available second hand from Amazon so they may be able to get the
ISBN
from the above number. It is quite cheap though - my copy was only $35.

Sorry
Bill


Bill, please send the exact, complete title, author(s),and publishing date
and I'll try again. Thanks
Eli

"Bill Hobba" wrote in message
...
Bill Hobba wrote:
Recently got the book on recommendation of Mati Meron. I just want to say
it is a fabulous little book - not quite up their with Landau - but close.
It weaves the interconnections between classical and quantum mechanics and
QFT theory like no other I have found. Great insights all the way
through -
such as why we need the operator formalism of QFT (the reason is it allows
an out to the acasualty problems of SR applied to the Feynamn formalism -
reinterpreting it as a non local operator immediately solves the problem
and
since we know from the cluster decomposition property this is possible it
works).'

Androcles replied:
Feynamn ... Never heard of her.

As I said the last time I made the same typo - it is a fact I am eternally
grateful for as it would mean there is a chance of you breeding - what a
discussing thought. Those that judge on form rather than content are
displaying one of the weakest of all human fragilities - for it is an
indication they do not understand the content yet do not want to appear
stupid by saying nothing. However the subterfuge was transparent when I
caught onto it at work and is just as transparent when you use it.

Thanks
Bill
Those that judge on form rather than content are displaying one of the
weakest of all human fragilities, as you did with the very sickening
pholroyd, now exposed as a complete charlatan.
Remember this display of your remarkable martial arts intelligence?
Very astute of you, and not the decency to offer an apology, either. You
have the mind of a gullible moron, Hobba.You and your thoughts of violence
sicken me.


"Bill Hobba" wrote in message
...

Androcles wrote:
'Why do you write such atrocious, improperly punctuated English? Can you
not
learn by example, or do you have a learning disability, Mr. "want learn
more
about qed"? Just for starters, try using a capital letter at the start
of
sentence. I really do think your style is deliberate and fake.'


Bill Hobba wrote:
'Or maybe it is because I want to discuss physics, which you obviously do
not, as indicated by your concentration on my spelling and grammatical
errors Concentration on the form of what someone writes rather than the
content is strongly suggestive that the content is beyond the person in
question. I recall one time many years ago, my director came in laughing
his head off and invited me over to see the comments by his boss on a
computer security report he and I jointly wrote. It consisted of spelling
and grammar corrections and nothing about what was being proposed or
said -
which of course meant he did not understand it and was not willing to
admit
it. Ring any bells Androcles?

I goofed - I thought Androcles was referring to me but he was referring to
pholroyd. What a pitiful excuse for a human being Androcles is to have a
go
at someone who is making the genuine effort to learn based entirely on the
form of their posts. It is one thing to have a go at me, I have a lot of
experience in dealing with wiseasses where I work, and ignorant ones like
Androcles are more of a joke than a challenge - but I have no idea
whatever
about pholroyd's background except it is evident he actually wants to
learn. Not to reciprocate genuine interest with at least respect and
dignity is to demonstrate such a lack of understanding of how to relate to
others that I am surprised Androcles has survived this long without having
some sense knocked into him. Androcles, you have much to learn in more
ways
than
one, much indeed.

BTW having studied martial arts I am against violence in all forms except
for
self defense - but people like Androcles sorely tempt me, sorely indeed.

Also sorry for the late response - we have had a power outage here for the
last 24 hours.

Slightly Sickened
Bill

Eli wrote:

Bill, please send the exact, complete title, author(s),and publishing date
and I'll try again. Thanks

title: Classical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, Field Theory
author: Amnon Katz
publisher: Academic Press 1965


This link may work.

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Oop...sp?ean=2781916
242897


---Tim Shuba---

Eli Botkin wrote;
'Bill, please send the exact, complete title, author(s),and publishing date
and I'll try again. Thanks Eli'

Classical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, Field Theory - Amnon Katz

Thanks
Bill

Bill Hobba wrote:
As I said the last time I made the same typo - it is a fact I am
eternally
grateful for as it would mean there is a chance of you breeding - what a
discussing thought. Those that judge on form rather than content are
displaying one of the weakest of all human fragilities - for it is an
indication they do not understand the content yet do not want to appear
stupid by saying nothing. However the subterfuge was transparent when I
caught onto it at work and is just as transparent when you use it.

Androcles wrote:
Those that judge on form rather than content are displaying one of the
weakest of all human fragilities, as you did with the very sickening
pholroyd, now exposed as a complete charlatan.

And exactly how has pholroyd been exposed as a complete charlatan? Did I
miss something? I am sure if Androcles had concrete evidence he would
posted it - the fact he does not is highly suggestive none exists - although
I have been mistaken before.

Androcles wrote:
Remember this display of your remarkable martial arts intelligence?
Very astute of you, and not the decency to offer an apology, either. You
have the mind of a gullible moron, Hobba.You and your thoughts of violence
sicken me.

My knees have now given way on me and I no longer can practice Tai-Chi and
Pa Kua. Rest assured for you to practice real martial arts an attitude
change of drastic proportions would be required. So unless you can provide
the evidence you alluded to then I suggest you practice some Chi Kung to
obtain some inner harmony and tranquility to see things with better
rationality. For to make statements without evidence is a sure indication
of inner imbalance and disharmony - but such in not a new mode of existence
for Androcles. The moment you actually supply such evidence, I will of
course, immediately apologize - but not a moment before.

Thanks
Bill