![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: mystery |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Most scientists agree with Planck in that the smallest, most basic,
measurable energy amount or quantum of action is 6.6261 X 10^-34 joule-sec, which he named Quanta. That all of matter's spectral properties and patterns can be explained in terms of multiples of 'h', and that thanks to the determination of 'h', we now can conceive order at the quantum mechanical level. Most also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave and is accompanied by a wave, also that he showed that electrons traverse an integral number of wavelengths for each complete orbit of an atom and that the quantization and structure of quanta will always depend on the properties of their source and the objects with which they interact. Quanta are measurable amounts of cycling spacetime. In reality there aren't any vibrating point particles, as Heisenberg properly and adeptly assumed, it's more like wavefronts... or membranes. A quantum of action (quanta) appears as a very small region of randomly fluctuating, process independent object, and hbar as a ratio, mc^2/w, or energy divided by angular frequency. There are no point particles, a point particle must be internally static, with no internal time, and that is not possible. Points don't even occupy space, they don't really exist, the point is only a mathematical convenience. Each particle, even the smallest, is in constant internal motion, each is the product of an internal instability. Each particle possesses its own internal time, and for this reason it is impossible to get rid of all uncertainties at a spacetime level. We can't get rid of 'h' - Planck's constant - from which Heisenberg derived his Uncertainty Principle, which is closely related to the particle's wave-length, and from where particle complementarity and the non-commutativity between momentum and position emerged as properties of space and matter and as proof of the inseparability of quantum processes. Momentum and position don't commute because you can't be stopped and moving at the same time. The fundamental particle must then be a small spherical region of pulsating spacetime whose diameter equals one Planck length. Material space (as opposed to empty space) must be filled with them, it is spacetime's background, the substrate to all matter, a sea of randomly fluctuating particles. Material space is grainy, it's a sea of particles, each of which has a diameter and its own internal motion or cycle. According to Timothy Boyer, material space is constituted by al least two different spectrums. One is noisy and expanding, while the other is self-organized and condensing. One exhibits negative gravitation, the other positive gravitation. From one material space is created, from the other, matter. Matter waves are constantly flowing inwards into matter, while heat and light flow away from matter. There is a continuos condensation and expansion of the substrate taking place. As objects are accelerated in a space-time metric, each new position creates new energy requirements from the continuum. Hyperspace is filled with information bits, matter precursors, a pre-geometry made of process independent units of information which exist in chaos and are ordered by logic and activity into spacetime. But for natural reasons, i.e. energy conservation laws, everything that comes into spacetime must be perceived and energetically measured before it can materialize. There has to be a measuring device sensing the particle's location and momentum in relation with the rest of that inertial frame of reference before it can crystallize, as the information that constitutes it flows radially from hyperspace towards its center in spacetime. But this measuring device isn't some external being, it is the Universe itself. Each particle senses each other and their relation to space (Mach), building an information network filled with geometrical relationships (spacetime), which are in turn used as the future is built on the already existing information. Information is created and preserved in matter (i.e., DNA). Particles in spacetime perceive, select and integrate into their state wave function only that information which is important or useful to them. The observer, in present theory, must then refer to any object that is able to interpret environmental information brought to it by EM waves. Observation/measurement with the only purpose of establishing the particle's spatial parameters (speed, size, density...) in that inertial frame. The particle must first be in thermal equilibrium with the environment before it can exist as matter in spacetime, and that's the law! Von Neumann was right when he said that the evolution of the Schrodinger wave could only depend on quantum mechanical observables (implying that this information can only come from spacetime) yet including the observer (mind) as an efficacious agent (since the theory considers brains to be measuring instruments). The only reason human brains entered the equation was that, as they observed and perceived light (EMR) coming from the particle, information about momentum and location, which is vital to maintain energy conservation laws, became known to the particle/system allowing it to complete the feedback control loop and continue to condense. Particle complementarity is due to an indivisible process which originates in a common background, but the only information being transferred (through EMR in hyperspace) from the aether to the particles is that concerning momentum and location in relation with that inertial frame and the rest of Universe. There is no need for some mega information storage system which must contain the history of the Universe, all the information needed for the evolution of the system in spacetime is contained by the system itself - in spacetime. According to Mach and others, motion by all objects within the Universe is instantaneously reported through momentum space. This is where phenomena like inertia comes from. As a particle senses other particles it completes the information exchange, realizing the spatial relationships between particles and space that is needed to collapse the wave packet from hyperspace as it crystallizes into spacetime. Perception is a very old natural function of matter not some exclusive human ability. -- Laurent |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Laurent" wrote in message ... Most scientists agree with Planck in that the smallest, most basic, measurable energy amount or quantum of action is 6.6261 X 10^-34 joule-sec, which he named Quanta. No. The spin of an electron is only h/2 That all of matter's spectral properties and patterns can be explained in terms of multiples of 'h', and that thanks to the determination of 'h', we now can conceive order at the quantum mechanical level. Most also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave No. Every object does most decidedly not move in a wave. and is accompanied by a wave, also that he showed that electrons traverse an integral number of wavelengths for each complete orbit of an atom and that the quantization and structure of quanta will always depend on the properties of their source and the objects with which they interact. The Bohr atom reached the end of its usefulness quite soon after it was propounded. It fails to cope correctly with the higher angular momentum states of hydrogen and does not even pretend to make a start with the helium atom. let alone the other 90 odd ones. Quanta are measurable amounts of cycling spacetime. That sentence sounded fine, but was devoid of sense. In reality there aren't any vibrating point particles, as Heisenberg properly and adeptly assumed, it's more like wavefronts... or membranes. A quantum of action (quanta) appears as a very small region of randomly fluctuating, process independent object, and hbar as a ratio, mc^2/w, or energy divided by angular frequency. You are maundering There are no point particles, a point particle must be internally static, with no internal time, and that is not possible. That is a unsupported assertion Points don't even occupy space, they don't really exist, the point is only a mathematical convenience. Each particle, even the smallest, is in constant internal motion, each is the product of an internal instability. Each particle possesses its own internal time, and for this reason it is impossible to get rid of all uncertainties at a spacetime level. You are drivelling again. We can't get rid of 'h' - Planck's constant - from which Heisenberg derived his Uncertainty Principle, which is closely related to the particle's wave-length, and from where particle complementarity What is "particle complementarity"? and the non-commutativity between momentum and position emerged as properties of space and matter and as proof of the inseparability of quantum processes. Momentum and position don't commute because you can't be stopped and moving at the same time. Drivelling mode again? The fundamental particle must then be a small spherical region of pulsating spacetime whose diameter equals one Planck length. Ex cathedra statements carry no weight. Material space (as opposed to empty space) must be filled with them, it is spacetime's background, the substrate to all matter, a sea of randomly fluctuating particles. Balls I could not stomach the rest, so I snipped it [snip] Franz |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Laurent wrote:
Most scientists agree with Planck in that the smallest, most basic, measurable energy amount or quantum of action is 6.6261 X 10^-34 joule-sec, which he named Quanta. [snip] 1) Learn how to speak English. 2) No, he didn't. 3) An electron, proton, and neutron all have h/2 spin, idiot. That is 1/2 the size of your astoundingly ignorant "smallest, most basic, measurable energy [sic] amount" spew. 4) Action isn't energy, you idiot. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm (Do something naughty to physics) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:35:18 -0500, Laurent wrote:
Most also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave and is accompanied by a wave What attribute of that object (or what quantity) varies periodically as elucidated by that "wave"? -- gohe khod rA khordan barAye yek zendAni mozu'e kheyli mohemmist. harkas in kAr rA kard hatman divAneh ast. va hamin sange mahake tabibe zendAn ast. agar kasi divAneh shod tabibe zendAn mi'Ayad va mi'istad, gohe zendAni rA midahad bokhorad. agar khord ke mariz ast va agar nakhord pas dorugh gofteh, mostahaghghe dastband va pAband ast. "Bozorg Alavi" |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:25:41 +0000 (UTC), Franz Heymann
wrote: No. Every object does most decidedly not move in a wave. What do you mean by "moving in a wave"? -- bAd tond asto cherAghe abtari zu begirAnam cherAghe digari "Mowlana" |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Maleki" wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:35:18 -0500, Laurent wrote: Most also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave and is accompanied by a wave What attribute of that object (or what quantity) varies periodically as elucidated by that "wave"? Its position. Remember Lambda, de Broglie? Particles with momentum have a wavelength, called the de Broglie wavelength. -- gohe khod rA khordan barAye yek zendAni mozu'e kheyli mohemmist. harkas in kAr rA kard hatman divAneh ast. va hamin sange mahake tabibe zendAn ast. agar kasi divAneh shod tabibe zendAn mi'Ayad va mi'istad, gohe zendAni rA midahad bokhorad. agar khord ke mariz ast va agar nakhord pas dorugh gofteh, mostahaghghe dastband va pAband ast. "Bozorg Alavi" |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Maleki" wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:25:41 +0000 (UTC), Franz Heymann wrote: No. Every object does most decidedly not move in a wave. What do you mean by "moving in a wave"? Don't ask me. Ask the nerd who said it, to whom I was replying. Franz |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Laurent" wrote in message ... Most scientists agree with Planck in that the smallest, most basic, measurable energy amount or quantum of action is 6.6261 X 10^-34 joule-sec, which he named Quanta. That all of matter's spectral properties and patterns can be explained in terms of multiples of 'h', and that thanks to the determination of 'h', we now can conceive order at the quantum mechanical level. Most also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave and is accompanied by a wave, also that he showed that electrons traverse an integral number of wavelengths for each complete orbit of an atom and that the quantization and structure of quanta will always depend on the properties of their source and the objects with which they interact. Quanta are measurable amounts of cycling spacetime. In reality there aren't any vibrating point particles, as Heisenberg properly and adeptly assumed, it's more like wavefronts... or membranes. A quantum of action (quanta) appears as a very small region of randomly fluctuating, process independent object, and hbar as a ratio, mc^2/w, or energy divided by angular frequency. There are no point particles, a point particle must be internally static, with no internal time, and that is not possible. Points don't even occupy space, they don't really exist, the point is only a mathematical convenience. Each particle, even the smallest, is in constant internal motion, each is the product of an internal instability. Each particle possesses its own internal time, and for this reason it is impossible to get rid of all uncertainties at a spacetime level. We can't get rid of 'h' - Planck's constant - from which Heisenberg derived his Uncertainty Principle, which is closely related to the particle's wave-length, and from where particle complementarity and the non-commutativity between momentum and position emerged as properties of space and matter and as proof of the inseparability of quantum processes. Momentum and position don't commute because you can't be stopped and moving at the same time. The fundamental particle must then be a small spherical region of pulsating spacetime whose diameter equals one Planck length. Material space (as opposed to empty space) must be filled with them, it is spacetime's background, the substrate to all matter, a sea of randomly fluctuating particles. Material space is grainy, it's a sea of particles, each of which has a diameter and its own internal motion or cycle. According to Timothy Boyer, material space is constituted by al least two different spectrums. One is noisy and expanding, while the other is self-organized and condensing. One exhibits negative gravitation, the other positive gravitation. From one material space is created, from the other, matter. Matter waves are constantly flowing inwards into matter, while heat and light flow away from matter. There is a continuos condensation and expansion of the substrate taking place. As objects are accelerated in a space-time metric, each new position creates new energy requirements from the continuum. Hyperspace is filled with information bits, matter precursors, a pre-geometry made of process independent units of information which exist in chaos and are ordered by logic and activity into spacetime. But for natural reasons, i.e. energy conservation laws, everything that comes into spacetime must be perceived and energetically measured before it can materialize. There has to be a measuring device sensing the particle's location and momentum in relation with the rest of that inertial frame of reference before it can crystallize, as the information that constitutes it flows radially from hyperspace towards its center in spacetime. But this measuring device isn't some external being, it is the Universe itself. Each particle senses each other and their relation to space (Mach), building an information network filled with geometrical relationships (spacetime), which are in turn used as the future is built on the already existing information. Information is created and preserved in matter (i.e., DNA). Particles in spacetime perceive, select and integrate into their state wave function only that information which is important or useful to them. The observer, in present theory, must then refer to any object that is able to interpret environmental information brought to it by EM waves. Observation/measurement with the only purpose of establishing the particle's spatial parameters (speed, size, density...) in that inertial frame. The particle must first be in thermal equilibrium with the environment before it can exist as matter in spacetime, and that's the law! Von Neumann was right when he said that the evolution of the Schrodinger wave could only depend on quantum mechanical observables (implying that this information can only come from spacetime) yet including the observer (mind) as an efficacious agent (since the theory considers brains to be measuring instruments). The only reason human brains entered the equation was that, as they observed and perceived light (EMR) coming from the particle, information about momentum and location, which is vital to maintain energy conservation laws, became known to the particle/system allowing it to complete the feedback control loop and continue to condense. Particle complementarity is due to an indivisible process which originates in a common background, but the only information being transferred (through EMR in hyperspace) from the aether to the particles is that concerning momentum and location in relation with that inertial frame and the rest of Universe. There is no need for some mega information storage system which must contain the history of the Universe, all the information needed for the evolution of the system in spacetime is contained by the system itself - in spacetime. According to Mach and others, motion by all objects within the Universe is instantaneously reported through momentum space. This is where phenomena like inertia comes from. As a particle senses other particles it completes the information exchange, realizing the spatial relationships between particles and space that is needed to collapse the wave packet from hyperspace as it crystallizes into spacetime. Perception is a very old natural function of matter not some exclusive human ability. -- Laurent Perception of matter...hmm... Matter's perception of itself. m = E/c^2. Matter's ability to perceive the non-existence of matter... The flubber that an electron is made of. Summat ain't right. Androcles |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... "Laurent" wrote in message ... Most scientists agree with Planck in that the smallest, most basic, measurable energy amount or quantum of action is 6.6261 X 10^-34 joule-sec, which he named Quanta. No. The spin of an electron is only h/2 That all of matter's spectral properties and patterns can be explained in terms of multiples of 'h', and that thanks to the determination of 'h', we now can conceive order at the quantum mechanical level. Most also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave No. Every object does most decidedly not move in a wave. and is accompanied by a wave, also that he showed that electrons traverse an integral number of wavelengths for each complete orbit of an atom and that the quantization and structure of quanta will always depend on the properties of their source and the objects with which they interact. The Bohr atom reached the end of its usefulness quite soon after it was propounded. It fails to cope correctly with the higher angular momentum states of hydrogen and does not even pretend to make a start with the helium atom. let alone the other 90 odd ones. Quanta are measurable amounts of cycling spacetime. That sentence sounded fine, but was devoid of sense. In reality there aren't any vibrating point particles, as Heisenberg properly and adeptly assumed, it's more like wavefronts... or membranes. A quantum of action (quanta) appears as a very small region of randomly fluctuating, process independent object, and hbar as a ratio, mc^2/w, or energy divided by angular frequency. You are maundering There are no point particles, a point particle must be internally static, with no internal time, and that is not possible. That is a unsupported assertion Points don't even occupy space, they don't really exist, the point is only a mathematical convenience. Each particle, even the smallest, is in constant internal motion, each is the product of an internal instability. Each particle possesses its own internal time, and for this reason it is impossible to get rid of all uncertainties at a spacetime level. You are drivelling again. We can't get rid of 'h' - Planck's constant - from which Heisenberg derived his Uncertainty Principle, which is closely related to the particle's wave-length, and from where particle complementarity What is "particle complementarity"? and the non-commutativity between momentum and position emerged as properties of space and matter and as proof of the inseparability of quantum processes. Momentum and position don't commute because you can't be stopped and moving at the same time. Drivelling mode again? The fundamental particle must then be a small spherical region of pulsating spacetime whose diameter equals one Planck length. Ex cathedra statements carry no weight. Material space (as opposed to empty space) must be filled with them, it is spacetime's background, the substrate to all matter, a sea of randomly fluctuating particles. Balls of flubber the electron is made of. I could not stomach the signature, so I snipped it Androcles |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:24:54 -0500, Laurent wrote:
"Maleki" wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:35:18 -0500, Laurent wrote: Most also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave and is accompanied by a wave What attribute of that object (or what quantity) varies periodically as elucidated by that "wave"? Its position. Remember Lambda, de Broglie? Particles with momentum have a wavelength, called the de Broglie wavelength. Its position? So its position goes to a maximum and then comes back down to zero and keeps going into negative position to a negative maximum and then comes back to zero and so on? I don't think so -- shotor khAbide'ash ham boland tar az khare istAdeh ast. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LiTTLE iMPs ..a GR MYSTERY.!! | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | August 29th 05 11:45 AM |
| LiTTLE iMPs ..a GR MYSTERY.!! | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 28th 05 01:19 AM |
| MYSTERY... | (P) | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | February 5th 05 06:03 PM |
| mystery | B Gilmour | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | June 25th 04 04:18 PM |
| What Mystery? | Laurent | Physics - General Discussion | 91 | February 20th 04 04:20 PM |