A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Ranger West
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html

The Theory of Moving Dimensions
Dr. Elliot McGucken

In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Such a concept may be used to explain
physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics,
while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and
Relativity.

Simply put, it is not possible to rotate an object into the time
dimension without that object gaining a velocity. Thus the time
dimension itself must be expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. Another way of looking at this is asking, "Why does
something always move when it is rotated out of the three spatial
dimensions and into the time dimension?" If someone can conduct a
Lorentz transformation on a ruler, and rotate it into the time
dimension without it moving through the three spatial dimensions, I
would very much like to hear about it.

Einstein's two postulates of relativity state:

I. The laws of physical phenomena are the same in all inertial frames.
II. The velocity of light in free space is a universal constant,
independendent of any relative motion of teh source and teh observer.

I propose that the two postulates may be expressed in an alternative
manner, by stating the following law of moving dimensions:

I. The time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial
dimensions.


This can be shown illustrated in several ways: Consider an expression
for the space-time interval of zero length, or of the null vector,
which traces a photon's path through space-time:

x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=0
or
x^2+y^2+z^2=c^2t^2

Which for one spatial dimension becomes
x^2=c^2t^2

or x=ct

by taking the derivative of both sides with respect to t, we get

dx/dt = d/dt (ct) = c

so

dx/dt = c

And hence the time rate of change of the spatial dimension relative to
the time rate of change of the time dimension is equal to the velocity
of light.

ct| /
| /
| /
| /
| /
|/_______________
x

Also, if we trace the path of a photon on a space-time diagram, the
only way for a photon to remain stationary in space time is to move at
the speed of light, or to keep up with the expanding time dimension.
The null vector, which represents a vector of zero length in
space-time, can only imply zero movement through space-time. Even
though a photon moves through space at a velocity equal to C, it stays
stationary in space-time. Is it not strange at first that in order to
remain stationary in space time, a photon appears move at the speed of
light through space? This is only because the time dimension itself is
moving relative to space.

Einstein proclaimed that all objects travel through space-time at c.
Even though we perceive a ruler along the x axis to be stationary, it
is yet traveling through space-time at the fixed speed of c, implying
that time is moving through it. Rotate it towards the y axis, and its
projection upon the x axis shortens, yet it still appears to be
stationary, and it is still traveling through space-time at the rate
of c. Rotate it into the time dimension, and it's projection along
the x axis still shortens, but now it begins to move through the three
spatial dimensions, while maintaining the fixed speed of c through
space-time. Again, we see it move through the three spatial
dimensions as it is rotated into the time dimension because the time
dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions.

As Brian Greene points out in the Appendix to Chapter 2 of The Elegant
Universe, we note that from the space-time position 4-vector
x=(ct,x1,x2,x3), we can create the velocity 4-vector u=dx/d(tau),
where tau is the proper time defined by
d(tau)^2=dt^2-c^-2(dx1^2+dx2^2+dx3^2). Then the "speed through
space-time" is the magnitude of the 4-vector u,
((c^2dt^2-dx^2)/(dt^2-c^-2dx^2))^(1/2), which is identically the speed
of light c. Now, we can rearrange the equation
c^2(dt/d(tau))^2-(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2 to be c^2(d(tau)/dt))^2
+(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2. This shows that an increase of an object's speed
through space, (dx/d(tau))^2)^(1/2)= dx/d(tau) must be accompanied by
a decrease in d(tau)/dt which is the object's speed through time,
which also may be considered the rate at which time elapses on it's
own clock d(tau) or the proper time, as compared with that on our
stationary clock dt.

As an object moves through space, it is rotated into the time
dimension, and less wave fronts of time are allowed to pass through it
relative to a stationary object, which bears the full brunt of wave
fronts. Thus a moving clock will run slower, as all clocks are based
on the probabilistic emission and propagation of photons, and as a
moving clock catches up with the expanding wavefront of time, the
chance that a photon will be emitted without being reabsorbed is
diminished.
Thus it is shown that the spatial and temporal dimensions are moving
relative to one-another. The laws and equations of relativity and
quantum mechanics rest upon this fundamental nature of physical
reality.

Relativistic and quantum mechanical phenomena can be accounted for by
the underlying nature of the relatively moving dimensions. Time
dialation, relativistic length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy can all be seen to derive from this concept of moving
dimensions. The statistical wave nature of matter and energy also
rests upon the relative motion of the underlying dimensions.

As one rotates into the time dimension, one becomes more orthogonal to
the spatial dimensions, and thus one's length contracts. And too, as
the time dimension is moving relative to the spatial dimensions, one
begins to move.

Wave-particle duality and quantum mechanical probabilistic behavior
can be accounted for by the relative motion between the dimensions, in
which both particles and waves exist. Feynman's many-paths integrals,
reflecting the notion that a particle travels all paths, can be
accounted for by the fact that until it interacts with other matter in
the three spatial dimensions, there is a probability that a particle
or photon may exist as a pure wave, rotated into the fourth dimension,
moving along with expanding time, independent of the spatial
dimensions. So it is that radiowaves may pass through walls, carrying
energy and thus mass.

The second law of thermodynamics (increasing entropy) can be accounted
for with the fact that all particles and matter have a chance of
existing in a dimension expanding at a constant rate, equally in all
dimensions, relative to the rest. The spherical symmetry of a photon's
wavefront may be viewed as the result of matter having been rotated
into the time dimension--the matter has become orthogonal to the
spatial dimensions, and it is now expanding along with time, equally
in all directions.

Einstein's second postulate, stating that the velocity of light is a
universal constant, holds to be true because the velocity of light is
merely the rate of propagation of a dimension relative to the other
dimensions. Although this relative rate of propagations between
dimensions may vary, we shall always interpret it as a constant,
because we are used to measuring the velocity of the propagation of
energy relative to the velocity of the propagation of energy, which we
write as c.

Relativistic time dialation occurs because as an object approaches the
speed of light, the object approaches the speed of the propagation of
energy. As time is measured with regards to the propagation of energy,
such as the emission of a photon (in an electrical circuit or a
mechanical spring) or or the occurence of a random event which
liberates energy, less time will pass for an entity which is
propagating at a rate which is close to the propagation of energy
itself. As an entity gains velocity, it is roated into the moving time
dimension, and it in a sense it catches up with the dimension.

Relativistic length contraction is always accompanied by an increase
in velocity, as the probability that each quantum of the object
resides in the time dimension is increased. Relativistic length
contraction can be accounted for by the fact that as an object gains
velocity its probabilistic wave function, or its essence, is rotated
into the time dimension, and thus it appears shorter from the
persepective of the three spatial dimensions. At the speed of light
the object would have to be a photon, so as to be completely absent
from the spatial dimension, as any presence or probability that a
particle is in the spatial dimnsion means that there is a probability
that the time dimension will expand without carrying it along, in
essence leaving it behind for that moment it exists in the spatial
dimension.

Any material entity gains more energy as its velocity increases, and
relativity demonstrates that the entity also gains more mass. When
energy is added to an entity, it may also appears as mass, as that
energy has a finite chance of interacting with the spatial dimensions.

All matter has a spatial component, or a probability of interacting
with space, whereas a photon only interacts with that which is in the
time dimension.

In order to cause an entity to move, quanta of energy must be added to
it, and the entity will thus gain a new probabilities for existing in
the space and time dimensions, as its overall wavefunction, including
its mass and energy, is rotated out of the spatial dimension and into
the time dimension. This rotation into the time dimension will be
proportional to the amount of energy that has been added.

As only photons can exist purely in the spatial dimension, no entities
but for photons can ever reach the speed of light, as all matter has a
finite chance of existing purely in the spatial dimension. This
property gives rise to the concept of mass, as to exist in the spatial
dimension curves the fabric of space-time about the existence.

An entity moves through space-time according to its probability of
existing in space and time. The more energy a given entity has, the
more likely it is to exist in the time dimension, or be moving along
in the dimension which is expanding relative to the spatial
dimensions. Hence its greater velocity, and also its augmented chance
of interacting with matter over a fixed distance. This increased
chance of interacting with matter over a given distance can be
associated with a shorter deBroglie wavelength or a higher frequency.
A more energetic photon has a higher frequency, as it is composed of
more substance, and more momenergy must pass a given point at any
given time. A less energetic photon carries less momenergy, and thus
there is a smaller chance of it interacting with matter as it passes
on by. A more energetic photon has a higher probability of interacting
with matter as it passes it by, as its shorter wavelngth and higher
frequency represent a greater, more persistant existence in
space-time.

A photon has no spatial dimensions, as it is matter rotated into the
time dimension. Einstein's famous equation which expresses the
equivalnce between matter and energy:

E=mc^2

holds true because radiative energy, consisting of photons, is merely
matter which has been rotaed tinto the expanding time dimension.

In quantum mechanics energy is accounted for by the operator which
represents the infinitesimal change with respect to time, while
momentum is accounted for by an operator which represents the
infinitesimal change with respect to space. Both momentum and energy
are defined with the concept of change and probability. And too,
inherent in all waves are the concepts of motion and probability.

Einstein's postulates derive from the fact that in all inertial
reference frames, the relative motions between the dimensions is fixed
at a constant rate, because the relative motion between the dimensions
is measured relative to the relative motion. Thus the laws of physics,
and all physical concepts, which are all fundamentally based on the
concept of motion or change with respect to time, are also fixed in
all interial frames, and the speed of light is constant in all
inertail frames.

As physics concerns itself at all levels with changes relative to both
space and time, it makes sense that all physics, time, motion,
reality, life, and consciousness itself are founded upon a stage which
is endowed with intrinsic motion.

The underlying fabric of all reality, the dimensions themselves, are
moving relative to one another.

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html
Ads
  #2  
Old January 19th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Steve Ralph
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 811
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment


"Ranger West" wrote in message
om...
I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html

The Theory of Moving Dimensions
Dr. Elliot McGucken

In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Such a concept may be used to

explain
physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics,
while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and
Relativity.

Simply put, it is not possible to rotate an object into the time
dimension without that object gaining a velocity.


Simply put? What the hell are you babbling about? Exactly how
do you propose to do this?
Maybe you would like to rotate yourself into the time dimension,
maybe you will disappear altogether

SR

Thus the time
dimension itself must be expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. Another way of looking at this is asking, "Why does
something always move when it is rotated out of the three spatial
dimensions and into the time dimension?" If someone can conduct a
Lorentz transformation on a ruler, and rotate it into the time
dimension without it moving through the three spatial dimensions, I
would very much like to hear about it.

Einstein's two postulates of relativity state:

I. The laws of physical phenomena are the same in all inertial frames.
II. The velocity of light in free space is a universal constant,
independendent of any relative motion of teh source and teh observer.

I propose that the two postulates may be expressed in an alternative
manner, by stating the following law of moving dimensions:

I. The time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial
dimensions.


This can be shown illustrated in several ways: Consider an expression
for the space-time interval of zero length, or of the null vector,
which traces a photon's path through space-time:

x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=0
or
x^2+y^2+z^2=c^2t^2

Which for one spatial dimension becomes
x^2=c^2t^2

or x=ct

by taking the derivative of both sides with respect to t, we get

dx/dt = d/dt (ct) = c

so

dx/dt = c

And hence the time rate of change of the spatial dimension relative to
the time rate of change of the time dimension is equal to the velocity
of light.

ct| /
| /
| /
| /
| /
|/_______________
x

Also, if we trace the path of a photon on a space-time diagram, the
only way for a photon to remain stationary in space time is to move at
the speed of light, or to keep up with the expanding time dimension.
The null vector, which represents a vector of zero length in
space-time, can only imply zero movement through space-time. Even
though a photon moves through space at a velocity equal to C, it stays
stationary in space-time. Is it not strange at first that in order to
remain stationary in space time, a photon appears move at the speed of
light through space? This is only because the time dimension itself is
moving relative to space.

Einstein proclaimed that all objects travel through space-time at c.
Even though we perceive a ruler along the x axis to be stationary, it
is yet traveling through space-time at the fixed speed of c, implying
that time is moving through it. Rotate it towards the y axis, and its
projection upon the x axis shortens, yet it still appears to be
stationary, and it is still traveling through space-time at the rate
of c. Rotate it into the time dimension, and it's projection along
the x axis still shortens, but now it begins to move through the three
spatial dimensions, while maintaining the fixed speed of c through
space-time. Again, we see it move through the three spatial
dimensions as it is rotated into the time dimension because the time
dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions.

As Brian Greene points out in the Appendix to Chapter 2 of The Elegant
Universe, we note that from the space-time position 4-vector
x=(ct,x1,x2,x3), we can create the velocity 4-vector u=dx/d(tau),
where tau is the proper time defined by
d(tau)^2=dt^2-c^-2(dx1^2+dx2^2+dx3^2). Then the "speed through
space-time" is the magnitude of the 4-vector u,
((c^2dt^2-dx^2)/(dt^2-c^-2dx^2))^(1/2), which is identically the speed
of light c. Now, we can rearrange the equation
c^2(dt/d(tau))^2-(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2 to be c^2(d(tau)/dt))^2
+(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2. This shows that an increase of an object's speed
through space, (dx/d(tau))^2)^(1/2)= dx/d(tau) must be accompanied by
a decrease in d(tau)/dt which is the object's speed through time,
which also may be considered the rate at which time elapses on it's
own clock d(tau) or the proper time, as compared with that on our
stationary clock dt.

As an object moves through space, it is rotated into the time
dimension, and less wave fronts of time are allowed to pass through it
relative to a stationary object, which bears the full brunt of wave
fronts. Thus a moving clock will run slower, as all clocks are based
on the probabilistic emission and propagation of photons, and as a
moving clock catches up with the expanding wavefront of time, the
chance that a photon will be emitted without being reabsorbed is
diminished.
Thus it is shown that the spatial and temporal dimensions are moving
relative to one-another. The laws and equations of relativity and
quantum mechanics rest upon this fundamental nature of physical
reality.

Relativistic and quantum mechanical phenomena can be accounted for by
the underlying nature of the relatively moving dimensions. Time
dialation, relativistic length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy can all be seen to derive from this concept of moving
dimensions. The statistical wave nature of matter and energy also
rests upon the relative motion of the underlying dimensions.

As one rotates into the time dimension, one becomes more orthogonal to
the spatial dimensions, and thus one's length contracts. And too, as
the time dimension is moving relative to the spatial dimensions, one
begins to move.

Wave-particle duality and quantum mechanical probabilistic behavior
can be accounted for by the relative motion between the dimensions, in
which both particles and waves exist. Feynman's many-paths integrals,
reflecting the notion that a particle travels all paths, can be
accounted for by the fact that until it interacts with other matter in
the three spatial dimensions, there is a probability that a particle
or photon may exist as a pure wave, rotated into the fourth dimension,
moving along with expanding time, independent of the spatial
dimensions. So it is that radiowaves may pass through walls, carrying
energy and thus mass.

The second law of thermodynamics (increasing entropy) can be accounted
for with the fact that all particles and matter have a chance of
existing in a dimension expanding at a constant rate, equally in all
dimensions, relative to the rest. The spherical symmetry of a photon's
wavefront may be viewed as the result of matter having been rotated
into the time dimension--the matter has become orthogonal to the
spatial dimensions, and it is now expanding along with time, equally
in all directions.

Einstein's second postulate, stating that the velocity of light is a
universal constant, holds to be true because the velocity of light is
merely the rate of propagation of a dimension relative to the other
dimensions. Although this relative rate of propagations between
dimensions may vary, we shall always interpret it as a constant,
because we are used to measuring the velocity of the propagation of
energy relative to the velocity of the propagation of energy, which we
write as c.

Relativistic time dialation occurs because as an object approaches the
speed of light, the object approaches the speed of the propagation of
energy. As time is measured with regards to the propagation of energy,
such as the emission of a photon (in an electrical circuit or a
mechanical spring) or or the occurence of a random event which
liberates energy, less time will pass for an entity which is
propagating at a rate which is close to the propagation of energy
itself. As an entity gains velocity, it is roated into the moving time
dimension, and it in a sense it catches up with the dimension.

Relativistic length contraction is always accompanied by an increase
in velocity, as the probability that each quantum of the object
resides in the time dimension is increased. Relativistic length
contraction can be accounted for by the fact that as an object gains
velocity its probabilistic wave function, or its essence, is rotated
into the time dimension, and thus it appears shorter from the
persepective of the three spatial dimensions. At the speed of light
the object would have to be a photon, so as to be completely absent
from the spatial dimension, as any presence or probability that a
particle is in the spatial dimnsion means that there is a probability
that the time dimension will expand without carrying it along, in
essence leaving it behind for that moment it exists in the spatial
dimension.

Any material entity gains more energy as its velocity increases, and
relativity demonstrates that the entity also gains more mass. When
energy is added to an entity, it may also appears as mass, as that
energy has a finite chance of interacting with the spatial dimensions.

All matter has a spatial component, or a probability of interacting
with space, whereas a photon only interacts with that which is in the
time dimension.

In order to cause an entity to move, quanta of energy must be added to
it, and the entity will thus gain a new probabilities for existing in
the space and time dimensions, as its overall wavefunction, including
its mass and energy, is rotated out of the spatial dimension and into
the time dimension. This rotation into the time dimension will be
proportional to the amount of energy that has been added.

As only photons can exist purely in the spatial dimension, no entities
but for photons can ever reach the speed of light, as all matter has a
finite chance of existing purely in the spatial dimension. This
property gives rise to the concept of mass, as to exist in the spatial
dimension curves the fabric of space-time about the existence.

An entity moves through space-time according to its probability of
existing in space and time. The more energy a given entity has, the
more likely it is to exist in the time dimension, or be moving along
in the dimension which is expanding relative to the spatial
dimensions. Hence its greater velocity, and also its augmented chance
of interacting with matter over a fixed distance. This increased
chance of interacting with matter over a given distance can be
associated with a shorter deBroglie wavelength or a higher frequency.
A more energetic photon has a higher frequency, as it is composed of
more substance, and more momenergy must pass a given point at any
given time. A less energetic photon carries less momenergy, and thus
there is a smaller chance of it interacting with matter as it passes
on by. A more energetic photon has a higher probability of interacting
with matter as it passes it by, as its shorter wavelngth and higher
frequency represent a greater, more persistant existence in
space-time.

A photon has no spatial dimensions, as it is matter rotated into the
time dimension. Einstein's famous equation which expresses the
equivalnce between matter and energy:

E=mc^2

holds true because radiative energy, consisting of photons, is merely
matter which has been rotaed tinto the expanding time dimension.

In quantum mechanics energy is accounted for by the operator which
represents the infinitesimal change with respect to time, while
momentum is accounted for by an operator which represents the
infinitesimal change with respect to space. Both momentum and energy
are defined with the concept of change and probability. And too,
inherent in all waves are the concepts of motion and probability.

Einstein's postulates derive from the fact that in all inertial
reference frames, the relative motions between the dimensions is fixed
at a constant rate, because the relative motion between the dimensions
is measured relative to the relative motion. Thus the laws of physics,
and all physical concepts, which are all fundamentally based on the
concept of motion or change with respect to time, are also fixed in
all interial frames, and the speed of light is constant in all
inertail frames.

As physics concerns itself at all levels with changes relative to both
space and time, it makes sense that all physics, time, motion,
reality, life, and consciousness itself are founded upon a stage which
is endowed with intrinsic motion.

The underlying fabric of all reality, the dimensions themselves, are
moving relative to one another.

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html


  #3  
Old January 19th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Bjoern Feuerbacher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,532
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics andRelativity? Please Comment

Ranger West wrote:

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html

The Theory of Moving Dimensions
Dr. Elliot McGucken

In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Such a concept may be used to
explain
physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics,
while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and
Relativity.

Simply put, it is not possible to rotate an object into the time
dimension without that object gaining a velocity.


What do you mean by "rotate ... into the time dimension"? Do you
use the idea here that Lorentz transformation can be viewed as
generalized rotations in Minkowski space or what?


Thus the time
dimension itself must be expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.


How on earth does this follow???

[snip strange stuff]


or x=ct

by taking the derivative of both sides with respect to t, we get

dx/dt = d/dt (ct) = c

so

dx/dt = c


Obviously right.


And hence the time rate of change of the spatial dimension relative to
the time rate of change of the time dimension is equal to the velocity
of light.


How on earth do you get to this interpretation of the equation above???
It says nothing like that. It says simply that the rate of change of the
*position* of the particle per time is equal to c. It says *nothing*
about changes of dimensions!



[snip *lots* more of nonsense]


Bye,
Bjoern
  #4  
Old January 19th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,205
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics andRelativity? Please Comment

Ranger West wrote:

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at


[snip]

How many times must your face be rubbed in your own **** before you
learn to squat outside? Your spew is ludicrous. It violates
empirical observation. The first time you trolled it we all thought
"half-wit." Now you are psychotically pursuing the geometric
progression.

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
(Do something naughty to physics)
  #5  
Old January 19th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Dirk Van de moortel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,355
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment


"Ranger West" wrote in message om...
I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at

http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html

The Theory of Moving Dimensions
Dr. Elliot McGucken

In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving
relative to the three spatial dimensions.


You got a serious comment on
elenet-ops.be
Are you autistic and does it run in the family?

Dirk Vdm


  #6  
Old January 20th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Ken S. Tucker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,341
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment

"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in message ...

Hi

I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would
like to join me at
http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html
The Theory of Moving Dimensions
Dr. Elliot McGucken

In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving
relative to the three spatial dimensions.


One of my favorite movies is the Time Machine
starring Rod Taylor, his explanation of time is
thought provoking.

Anyway, if I set a watch on my desk for a minute
it's commonly regarded to have moved 186,000 mps
x 60 seconds in the direction of time in one minute.

Normally that's no big deal. But when that speed
threw time hit's something that deflects that speed into
space then *duck and cover*, because the result is a
nuclear explosion using E=mc^2.

If your watch was to hit some fat thing that's not
moving in time, and deflects into kinetic energy it
would mess up you're day.

I've even wondered if it's possible if objects
could be placed stationary in space-time, and then
stuff moving threw time - at the speed of light - hits
these objects and make a big explosion, of course
this is sci-fi, at least right now.

Such a concept may be used to explain
physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics,
while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and
Relativity.


I think QM is a combined *data* prediction/intrepretation
theory, and isn't so interested in what's *really* happening,
the argument about what's "real" is ongoing, and usually
becomes meta-physical, ie. undefined and semantic.

Ken S. Tucker
PS: Do any of my comments qualify to be placed into
Dr. McGucken's physics board? (I can do better).
  #7  
Old January 20th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Jason
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment

Steady as she goes, Uncle Al. Its often that people have good intuitions but
have difficulty describing them. Even if the intuitions turn out to be flawed,
there can sometimes be good insights that come out. If you don't have the
patience, someone else might.



  #8  
Old January 20th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Jason
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment

Actually... on second thoughts, as you were.

And Ranger West, buddy, do this at a university where you'll learn the rigour
your theory cries out for.


  #9  
Old January 20th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,205
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics andRelativity? Please Comment

Jason wrote:

Steady as she goes, Uncle Al. Its often that people have good intuitions but
have difficulty describing them. Even if the intuitions turn out to be flawed,
there can sometimes be good insights that come out. If you don't have the
patience, someone else might.


Western "intellectuals" - those damaged and defective mentalities
degreed in the Liberal Arts, religiousity, and soft (false) sciences -
brazenly pursue a vision of their own kind: creation of a virtual
reality distinct from factual reality and force-fit by majority vote.
This hallucination is "fair, diverse, and compensatory to victims of
historic abuse." The Liberal Arts glory in dialectic. There is no
assignable objective value to the object of the debate. This is
bull**** - employment for intellectual cripples; numerically swollen,
academically lax, and politically overheated.

The sciences use mathematics to model objective reality, constrained
by empirical observation. The idiot original poster is a god-besotted
jackass. His spew is ludicrous and loathsome. It is crap.

http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7
http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html
Experimental constraints on General Relativity.
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf
Nature 425 374 (2003)
http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries

The original poster spews crap by trivial observation. Your idiot
compassion is a disease, a refusal to kill cripples and support the
strong. It is very Liberal. It is John Kerry mouthing sour feel-good
platitudes while Sen. Edwared Kennedy stands drunkenly off to the side
smiling and looking down young distaff bosoms.

It is nothing but crap. It is only crap. It is purely crap. It is
clarified, concentrated, distilled, condensed, polished, packaged, and
briskly shoved up your fundament while homing in on your wallet crap.

It is the worst kind of pandering magnetic hernia truss multi-level
marketing to make you rich beyond your wildest dreams by tomorrow
without so much as a lick of personal inconvenience crap. It is Lotto
crap, Publisher's Clearinghouse crap, Home Shopping Network crap,
infomercial crap, Bre-X crap, hollow Earth crap, flat Earth crap,
Heaven's Gate crap, Chariots of the Gods crap, quartz crystal crap,
teleevangelical crap, thinner thighs in 30 days crap, other-ablement
crap, Virgin Mary on a taco crap, Elvis on a taco crap, War on Drugs
crap, War on Poverty crap, night basketball crap, eat oat bran crap,
breast enlargement cream crap, buy the Brooklyn Bridge at only a tiny
fraction of its true value crap, 1000-year old ginseng crap, 5000
yogic floaters to cleanse the world crap, free energy crap, anti-
gravity crap, hot young girls waiting for your call crap, psychics hot
line crap, never change your engine oil again crap, interpret your
dreams crap, sure-fire horse betting crap, Superman squeezing a lump
of coal into a blue white and perfect fully faceted 290 carat diamond
crap...

....Peace Dividend crap, Bosnian/Somali/Northern Ireland/Iraqi
pacification crap, peace in our time crap, Pacem in Terris crap,
Limits to Growth crap, Whip Inflation Now crap, I am not a crook crap,
nukular engineer crap, I didn't inhale crap, Health Care Crisis crap,
Department of Energy crap, marijuana will kill you crap, chastity
crap, tobacco isn't addictive crap, burning tobacco isn't carcinogenic
crap, children kidnapped over the Internet and sold into hebephile
pornography crap...

....MBA crap, human factors engineering crap, social engineering crap,
Project Head Start crap, thousand points of light crap, compassion
crap, nurturance crap, sensitivity counseling crap, Special Olympics
crap, learning disablement crap, Affirmative Action/Equal
Opportunity/diversity crap, multiculturalism crap, multilingualism
crap, Kwanzaa crap, Days of Rage crap, Nobel Prize in Literature crap,
automotive airbags crap, commuter lane crap, the E*L*E*C*T*R*I*C car
crap, recycled post-consumer waste crap, low volume flush toilet crap,
fuel from
biomass crap...

....Workers' Paradise crap, Democratic Republic of [you name it] crap,
New Soviet Man crap, Save the Earth crap, Furbish lousewort crap,
clothe animals to hide their genitalia crap, N-rays crap, Krebiozen
crap, amygdalin crap, smart drugs crap, coffee enemas to cure cancer
crap, cosmic consciousness crap, orgone energy crap, aura crap, astral
plane crap, astrology crap, ouija board crap...

Grow up. The weak are crushed by the strong and the world improves.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
(Do something naughty to physics)
  #10  
Old January 21st 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Jason
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment

Your idiot compassion is a disease, a refusal to kill cripples and
support the strong.

[Snip]

Grow up. The weak are crushed by the strong and the world improves.


You forgot to mention Hitler crap.

I know someone who has been pursuing alternative physics for just under a
decade. He is bent on a theory of everything based on Taoism. He might not be
able to see crap through the piles of ****, as you might phrase it, but I can't
knock his enthusiasm. He doesn't do it because he wants to get rid of steak
knives, he is genuine.

I know someone else who pursues rock-climbing and another who pursues money.
And I've just met another, called "Uncle Al", who seems be pursuing the role of
intellectual potty trainer. One man's crap is another man's fondue it seems.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TIME IS MOVING RELATIVE TO SPACE: Could the relative motion of dimensions unify quantumn mechanics and relativity? Dr. E Physics - General Discussion 0 April 16th 04 09:04 PM
Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment John Kennaugh Physics - General Discussion 0 April 11th 04 01:19 PM
Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment John Kennaugh Physics - General Discussion 0 April 11th 04 01:19 PM
Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment Jim Roberts Physics - General Discussion 10 January 26th 04 11:54 PM
Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment Jason Physics - General Discussion 4 January 25th 04 07:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mortgages - Loan - Celebrity - Cheap Loan - Mortgages