![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: comment, could, dimensions, mechanics, moving, quantumn, relativity, theroy, unify |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ranger West" wrote in message om... I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would like to join me at http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html The Theory of Moving Dimensions Dr. Elliot McGucken In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions. Such a concept may be used to explain physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics, while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity. Simply put, it is not possible to rotate an object into the time dimension without that object gaining a velocity. Simply put? What the hell are you babbling about? Exactly how do you propose to do this? Maybe you would like to rotate yourself into the time dimension, maybe you will disappear altogether SR Thus the time dimension itself must be expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Another way of looking at this is asking, "Why does something always move when it is rotated out of the three spatial dimensions and into the time dimension?" If someone can conduct a Lorentz transformation on a ruler, and rotate it into the time dimension without it moving through the three spatial dimensions, I would very much like to hear about it. Einstein's two postulates of relativity state: I. The laws of physical phenomena are the same in all inertial frames. II. The velocity of light in free space is a universal constant, independendent of any relative motion of teh source and teh observer. I propose that the two postulates may be expressed in an alternative manner, by stating the following law of moving dimensions: I. The time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions. This can be shown illustrated in several ways: Consider an expression for the space-time interval of zero length, or of the null vector, which traces a photon's path through space-time: x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=0 or x^2+y^2+z^2=c^2t^2 Which for one spatial dimension becomes x^2=c^2t^2 or x=ct by taking the derivative of both sides with respect to t, we get dx/dt = d/dt (ct) = c so dx/dt = c And hence the time rate of change of the spatial dimension relative to the time rate of change of the time dimension is equal to the velocity of light. ct| / | / | / | / | / |/_______________ x Also, if we trace the path of a photon on a space-time diagram, the only way for a photon to remain stationary in space time is to move at the speed of light, or to keep up with the expanding time dimension. The null vector, which represents a vector of zero length in space-time, can only imply zero movement through space-time. Even though a photon moves through space at a velocity equal to C, it stays stationary in space-time. Is it not strange at first that in order to remain stationary in space time, a photon appears move at the speed of light through space? This is only because the time dimension itself is moving relative to space. Einstein proclaimed that all objects travel through space-time at c. Even though we perceive a ruler along the x axis to be stationary, it is yet traveling through space-time at the fixed speed of c, implying that time is moving through it. Rotate it towards the y axis, and its projection upon the x axis shortens, yet it still appears to be stationary, and it is still traveling through space-time at the rate of c. Rotate it into the time dimension, and it's projection along the x axis still shortens, but now it begins to move through the three spatial dimensions, while maintaining the fixed speed of c through space-time. Again, we see it move through the three spatial dimensions as it is rotated into the time dimension because the time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions. As Brian Greene points out in the Appendix to Chapter 2 of The Elegant Universe, we note that from the space-time position 4-vector x=(ct,x1,x2,x3), we can create the velocity 4-vector u=dx/d(tau), where tau is the proper time defined by d(tau)^2=dt^2-c^-2(dx1^2+dx2^2+dx3^2). Then the "speed through space-time" is the magnitude of the 4-vector u, ((c^2dt^2-dx^2)/(dt^2-c^-2dx^2))^(1/2), which is identically the speed of light c. Now, we can rearrange the equation c^2(dt/d(tau))^2-(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2 to be c^2(d(tau)/dt))^2 +(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2. This shows that an increase of an object's speed through space, (dx/d(tau))^2)^(1/2)= dx/d(tau) must be accompanied by a decrease in d(tau)/dt which is the object's speed through time, which also may be considered the rate at which time elapses on it's own clock d(tau) or the proper time, as compared with that on our stationary clock dt. As an object moves through space, it is rotated into the time dimension, and less wave fronts of time are allowed to pass through it relative to a stationary object, which bears the full brunt of wave fronts. Thus a moving clock will run slower, as all clocks are based on the probabilistic emission and propagation of photons, and as a moving clock catches up with the expanding wavefront of time, the chance that a photon will be emitted without being reabsorbed is diminished. Thus it is shown that the spatial and temporal dimensions are moving relative to one-another. The laws and equations of relativity and quantum mechanics rest upon this fundamental nature of physical reality. Relativistic and quantum mechanical phenomena can be accounted for by the underlying nature of the relatively moving dimensions. Time dialation, relativistic length contraction, and the equivalence of mass and energy can all be seen to derive from this concept of moving dimensions. The statistical wave nature of matter and energy also rests upon the relative motion of the underlying dimensions. As one rotates into the time dimension, one becomes more orthogonal to the spatial dimensions, and thus one's length contracts. And too, as the time dimension is moving relative to the spatial dimensions, one begins to move. Wave-particle duality and quantum mechanical probabilistic behavior can be accounted for by the relative motion between the dimensions, in which both particles and waves exist. Feynman's many-paths integrals, reflecting the notion that a particle travels all paths, can be accounted for by the fact that until it interacts with other matter in the three spatial dimensions, there is a probability that a particle or photon may exist as a pure wave, rotated into the fourth dimension, moving along with expanding time, independent of the spatial dimensions. So it is that radiowaves may pass through walls, carrying energy and thus mass. The second law of thermodynamics (increasing entropy) can be accounted for with the fact that all particles and matter have a chance of existing in a dimension expanding at a constant rate, equally in all dimensions, relative to the rest. The spherical symmetry of a photon's wavefront may be viewed as the result of matter having been rotated into the time dimension--the matter has become orthogonal to the spatial dimensions, and it is now expanding along with time, equally in all directions. Einstein's second postulate, stating that the velocity of light is a universal constant, holds to be true because the velocity of light is merely the rate of propagation of a dimension relative to the other dimensions. Although this relative rate of propagations between dimensions may vary, we shall always interpret it as a constant, because we are used to measuring the velocity of the propagation of energy relative to the velocity of the propagation of energy, which we write as c. Relativistic time dialation occurs because as an object approaches the speed of light, the object approaches the speed of the propagation of energy. As time is measured with regards to the propagation of energy, such as the emission of a photon (in an electrical circuit or a mechanical spring) or or the occurence of a random event which liberates energy, less time will pass for an entity which is propagating at a rate which is close to the propagation of energy itself. As an entity gains velocity, it is roated into the moving time dimension, and it in a sense it catches up with the dimension. Relativistic length contraction is always accompanied by an increase in velocity, as the probability that each quantum of the object resides in the time dimension is increased. Relativistic length contraction can be accounted for by the fact that as an object gains velocity its probabilistic wave function, or its essence, is rotated into the time dimension, and thus it appears shorter from the persepective of the three spatial dimensions. At the speed of light the object would have to be a photon, so as to be completely absent from the spatial dimension, as any presence or probability that a particle is in the spatial dimnsion means that there is a probability that the time dimension will expand without carrying it along, in essence leaving it behind for that moment it exists in the spatial dimension. Any material entity gains more energy as its velocity increases, and relativity demonstrates that the entity also gains more mass. When energy is added to an entity, it may also appears as mass, as that energy has a finite chance of interacting with the spatial dimensions. All matter has a spatial component, or a probability of interacting with space, whereas a photon only interacts with that which is in the time dimension. In order to cause an entity to move, quanta of energy must be added to it, and the entity will thus gain a new probabilities for existing in the space and time dimensions, as its overall wavefunction, including its mass and energy, is rotated out of the spatial dimension and into the time dimension. This rotation into the time dimension will be proportional to the amount of energy that has been added. As only photons can exist purely in the spatial dimension, no entities but for photons can ever reach the speed of light, as all matter has a finite chance of existing purely in the spatial dimension. This property gives rise to the concept of mass, as to exist in the spatial dimension curves the fabric of space-time about the existence. An entity moves through space-time according to its probability of existing in space and time. The more energy a given entity has, the more likely it is to exist in the time dimension, or be moving along in the dimension which is expanding relative to the spatial dimensions. Hence its greater velocity, and also its augmented chance of interacting with matter over a fixed distance. This increased chance of interacting with matter over a given distance can be associated with a shorter deBroglie wavelength or a higher frequency. A more energetic photon has a higher frequency, as it is composed of more substance, and more momenergy must pass a given point at any given time. A less energetic photon carries less momenergy, and thus there is a smaller chance of it interacting with matter as it passes on by. A more energetic photon has a higher probability of interacting with matter as it passes it by, as its shorter wavelngth and higher frequency represent a greater, more persistant existence in space-time. A photon has no spatial dimensions, as it is matter rotated into the time dimension. Einstein's famous equation which expresses the equivalnce between matter and energy: E=mc^2 holds true because radiative energy, consisting of photons, is merely matter which has been rotaed tinto the expanding time dimension. In quantum mechanics energy is accounted for by the operator which represents the infinitesimal change with respect to time, while momentum is accounted for by an operator which represents the infinitesimal change with respect to space. Both momentum and energy are defined with the concept of change and probability. And too, inherent in all waves are the concepts of motion and probability. Einstein's postulates derive from the fact that in all inertial reference frames, the relative motions between the dimensions is fixed at a constant rate, because the relative motion between the dimensions is measured relative to the relative motion. Thus the laws of physics, and all physical concepts, which are all fundamentally based on the concept of motion or change with respect to time, are also fixed in all interial frames, and the speed of light is constant in all inertail frames. As physics concerns itself at all levels with changes relative to both space and time, it makes sense that all physics, time, motion, reality, life, and consciousness itself are founded upon a stage which is endowed with intrinsic motion. The underlying fabric of all reality, the dimensions themselves, are moving relative to one another. I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would like to join me at http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ranger West wrote:
I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would like to join me at http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html The Theory of Moving Dimensions Dr. Elliot McGucken In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions. Such a concept may be used to explain physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics, while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity. Simply put, it is not possible to rotate an object into the time dimension without that object gaining a velocity. What do you mean by "rotate ... into the time dimension"? Do you use the idea here that Lorentz transformation can be viewed as generalized rotations in Minkowski space or what? Thus the time dimension itself must be expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. How on earth does this follow??? [snip strange stuff] or x=ct by taking the derivative of both sides with respect to t, we get dx/dt = d/dt (ct) = c so dx/dt = c Obviously right. And hence the time rate of change of the spatial dimension relative to the time rate of change of the time dimension is equal to the velocity of light. How on earth do you get to this interpretation of the equation above??? It says nothing like that. It says simply that the rate of change of the *position* of the particle per time is equal to c. It says *nothing* about changes of dimensions! [snip *lots* more of nonsense] Bye, Bjoern |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ranger West wrote:
I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would like to join me at [snip] How many times must your face be rubbed in your own **** before you learn to squat outside? Your spew is ludicrous. It violates empirical observation. The first time you trolled it we all thought "half-wit." Now you are psychotically pursuing the geometric progression. http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm (Do something naughty to physics) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ranger West" wrote in message om... I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would like to join me at http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html The Theory of Moving Dimensions Dr. Elliot McGucken In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions. You got a serious comment on elenet-ops.be Are you autistic and does it run in the family? Dirk Vdm |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in message ...
Hi I'm treating this as an open-source physics project, if anyone would like to join me at http://killdevilhill.com/physicschat/wwwboard.html The Theory of Moving Dimensions Dr. Elliot McGucken In this paper I propose that the time dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions. One of my favorite movies is the Time Machine starring Rod Taylor, his explanation of time is thought provoking. Anyway, if I set a watch on my desk for a minute it's commonly regarded to have moved 186,000 mps x 60 seconds in the direction of time in one minute. Normally that's no big deal. But when that speed threw time hit's something that deflects that speed into space then *duck and cover*, because the result is a nuclear explosion using E=mc^2. If your watch was to hit some fat thing that's not moving in time, and deflects into kinetic energy it would mess up you're day. I've even wondered if it's possible if objects could be placed stationary in space-time, and then stuff moving threw time - at the speed of light - hits these objects and make a big explosion, of course this is sci-fi, at least right now. Such a concept may be used to explain physical phenomena encountered in relativity and quantum mechanics, while offering a path for the unification of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity. I think QM is a combined *data* prediction/intrepretation theory, and isn't so interested in what's *really* happening, the argument about what's "real" is ongoing, and usually becomes meta-physical, ie. undefined and semantic. Ken S. Tucker PS: Do any of my comments qualify to be placed into Dr. McGucken's physics board? (I can do better). |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steady as she goes, Uncle Al. Its often that people have good intuitions but
have difficulty describing them. Even if the intuitions turn out to be flawed, there can sometimes be good insights that come out. If you don't have the patience, someone else might. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually... on second thoughts, as you were.
And Ranger West, buddy, do this at a university where you'll learn the rigour your theory cries out for. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jason wrote:
Steady as she goes, Uncle Al. Its often that people have good intuitions but have difficulty describing them. Even if the intuitions turn out to be flawed, there can sometimes be good insights that come out. If you don't have the patience, someone else might. Western "intellectuals" - those damaged and defective mentalities degreed in the Liberal Arts, religiousity, and soft (false) sciences - brazenly pursue a vision of their own kind: creation of a virtual reality distinct from factual reality and force-fit by majority vote. This hallucination is "fair, diverse, and compensatory to victims of historic abuse." The Liberal Arts glory in dialectic. There is no assignable objective value to the object of the debate. This is bull**** - employment for intellectual cripples; numerically swollen, academically lax, and politically overheated. The sciences use mathematics to model objective reality, constrained by empirical observation. The idiot original poster is a god-besotted jackass. His spew is ludicrous and loathsome. It is crap. http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140 GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7 http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html Experimental constraints on General Relativity. http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf Nature 425 374 (2003) http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf Relativity in the GPS system http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071 Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries The original poster spews crap by trivial observation. Your idiot compassion is a disease, a refusal to kill cripples and support the strong. It is very Liberal. It is John Kerry mouthing sour feel-good platitudes while Sen. Edwared Kennedy stands drunkenly off to the side smiling and looking down young distaff bosoms. It is nothing but crap. It is only crap. It is purely crap. It is clarified, concentrated, distilled, condensed, polished, packaged, and briskly shoved up your fundament while homing in on your wallet crap. It is the worst kind of pandering magnetic hernia truss multi-level marketing to make you rich beyond your wildest dreams by tomorrow without so much as a lick of personal inconvenience crap. It is Lotto crap, Publisher's Clearinghouse crap, Home Shopping Network crap, infomercial crap, Bre-X crap, hollow Earth crap, flat Earth crap, Heaven's Gate crap, Chariots of the Gods crap, quartz crystal crap, teleevangelical crap, thinner thighs in 30 days crap, other-ablement crap, Virgin Mary on a taco crap, Elvis on a taco crap, War on Drugs crap, War on Poverty crap, night basketball crap, eat oat bran crap, breast enlargement cream crap, buy the Brooklyn Bridge at only a tiny fraction of its true value crap, 1000-year old ginseng crap, 5000 yogic floaters to cleanse the world crap, free energy crap, anti- gravity crap, hot young girls waiting for your call crap, psychics hot line crap, never change your engine oil again crap, interpret your dreams crap, sure-fire horse betting crap, Superman squeezing a lump of coal into a blue white and perfect fully faceted 290 carat diamond crap... ....Peace Dividend crap, Bosnian/Somali/Northern Ireland/Iraqi pacification crap, peace in our time crap, Pacem in Terris crap, Limits to Growth crap, Whip Inflation Now crap, I am not a crook crap, nukular engineer crap, I didn't inhale crap, Health Care Crisis crap, Department of Energy crap, marijuana will kill you crap, chastity crap, tobacco isn't addictive crap, burning tobacco isn't carcinogenic crap, children kidnapped over the Internet and sold into hebephile pornography crap... ....MBA crap, human factors engineering crap, social engineering crap, Project Head Start crap, thousand points of light crap, compassion crap, nurturance crap, sensitivity counseling crap, Special Olympics crap, learning disablement crap, Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity/diversity crap, multiculturalism crap, multilingualism crap, Kwanzaa crap, Days of Rage crap, Nobel Prize in Literature crap, automotive airbags crap, commuter lane crap, the E*L*E*C*T*R*I*C car crap, recycled post-consumer waste crap, low volume flush toilet crap, fuel from biomass crap... ....Workers' Paradise crap, Democratic Republic of [you name it] crap, New Soviet Man crap, Save the Earth crap, Furbish lousewort crap, clothe animals to hide their genitalia crap, N-rays crap, Krebiozen crap, amygdalin crap, smart drugs crap, coffee enemas to cure cancer crap, cosmic consciousness crap, orgone energy crap, aura crap, astral plane crap, astrology crap, ouija board crap... Grow up. The weak are crushed by the strong and the world improves. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm (Do something naughty to physics) |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your idiot compassion is a disease, a refusal to kill cripples and
support the strong. [Snip] Grow up. The weak are crushed by the strong and the world improves. You forgot to mention Hitler crap. I know someone who has been pursuing alternative physics for just under a decade. He is bent on a theory of everything based on Taoism. He might not be able to see crap through the piles of ****, as you might phrase it, but I can't knock his enthusiasm. He doesn't do it because he wants to get rid of steak knives, he is genuine. I know someone else who pursues rock-climbing and another who pursues money. And I've just met another, called "Uncle Al", who seems be pursuing the role of intellectual potty trainer. One man's crap is another man's fondue it seems. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TIME IS MOVING RELATIVE TO SPACE: Could the relative motion of dimensions unify quantumn mechanics and relativity? | Dr. E | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 16th 04 09:04 PM |
| Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment | John Kennaugh | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 11th 04 01:19 PM |
| Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment | John Kennaugh | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 11th 04 01:19 PM |
| Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment | Jim Roberts | Physics - General Discussion | 10 | January 26th 04 11:54 PM |
| Could a Theroy Of Moving Dimensions Unify Quantumn Mechanics and Relativity? Please Comment | Jason | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | January 25th 04 07:11 AM |