God=G_uv: Crushing Novelty Physics

Sorry for reposting this under a phoney name,
but most of the PhD's on the list already
have me killfiled under my true name and I
want to be sure this gets in their face.

The following post clearly demonstrates
that: God=G_uv
by a simple minded 'equivalence principle'
that any scientist can understand.

How much longer will the world have to
suffer while the cunctators of Physics
ignore this discovery?

The Pontifical Academy of Sciences
ignored Fr. Georges Lematrie for years
until Einstein himself recognized
he was right. How much longer will
the Pontifical Academy of Sciences
ignore Hammond?

How many millions of poor people will
have to die because of the delay in the
recognition of this discovery?

Must we wait until the 3rd World blows
up in our face in a grass roots religious
rebellion before we realize that a scientific
miracle has been discovered?

Do we have to watch as thousands of
Internet kooks throw stones at Science
like terrorists blowing up airplanes?
WHEN will the Rajahs of Physics get
their feet off the desk and start
paying attention:
---------------------------------------


God=G_uv
A simple equivalence principle


Many people have criticized God=G_uv.
because they don't understand it.
So... here is a simple "rubber rod
and clock" explanation that can be
understood by amateurs in Relativity.
FURTHERMORE, no attack on the theory is
valid unless it begins with an attack on
the existence of the following simple
(alleged) phenomena:


ALLEGED PHENOMENA
The World shrinks and slows down
for the first 18 years of life.

An 18 year old adult and a 9 year
old (half grown) child watch a Merry-go-round.
The Merry-go-round appears twice as fast
and looks twice as big to the 9 year old
as it does to the 18 year old. Yet they BOTH
agree according to the clock on the top of
the Merry-go-round it is turning at exactly
5 rpm. We also know that BOTH of them will
measure it with a tape measure to be 30 feet
in diameter.
STILL, I say it "looks twice as fast and
twice as big" to the 9 year old.
I point out that this is actually a
"provable" fact. Since we all remember
being 9, I won't go into the experimental
proof here unless someone challenges the
statement. It can be physically measured
by Psychometry.

NOW, I point out that no one has ever
considered it SIGNIFICANT that this phenomena
is identical to a well known phenomena of
Relativity.

If two observers watch the Earth from
remote locations, one on the Moon and one
parked next to a Black Hole, they will see
the Earth rotate at 2 different speeds.
The Moon observer sees the Earth rotate
once a day, while the Black Hole observer
sees it rotate twice a day. Yet BOTH agree
that according to a clock sitting on the
Earth's North Pole it is rotating only once
every 24 hours. Not only that, the Earth
looks twice as large to the observer next to
the Black Hole. This as we know, is due
to the large gravitational field near a
Black Hole.

I'm saying, that these two situations
are physically identical (this is an
EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE). I say it can be
proved that they are BOTH caused by GRAVITY.
The experimental proof of this is given
on my website so I won't repeat it here.

What I'm saying, is that everyone
has an "internal clock" and "internal
ruler" by which they judge the size and
speed of the world. This is the clock and
ruler of their SUBJECTIVE World. Meanwhile,
the "clock on the wall", and the "ruler on
the table", is the clock and ruler of the
"PROPER WORLD" (the universal objective World).
The theory says that every observer of
the "real world" is actually in a "effective
gravitational field" (EGF) the strength of
which depends on his state of growth (the
younger he is the stronger the field), and
this EGF "curves" his "personal world"
SAME AS ordinary gravitaty curves the real
world.
On my website it is demonstrated how
the existence of this "effective gravitational
field" is EXPERIMENTALLY PROVEN, and suggests
an obvious physical origin for it although I
stress for the benefit of pedants that the
PROOF that it EXISTS does NOT depend on
the explanation of the origin of it,
just as the PROOF of Einstein's theory does
NOT depend the explanation of the "quantum
gravity" origin of it.


I am positing an "Equivalence Principle"
that relates Growth to Curvatu

HAMMOND'S EQUIVALENCE
PRINCIPLE
Growth is "equivalent" to
a curvature of reality.

The importance of this is that it SCIENTIFICALLY
EXPLAINS GOD. "God" is simply the difference
between subjective and objective reality...
a difference that we all know about, because
veryones "objective reality" is the same,
but everyones "subjective reality" is different
.... this is particularly obvious in the case of
children vs. adults, but it is also noticible
between ADULTS. In fact, this difference is
the cause of "God".
The proof that it explains God, is that Science
has discovered that no adult ever reaches full
growth (Secular Trend), therefore we all have a
"residual curvature" in our "realities", and
this causes the phenomena known as "God".
QED, there actually is a God!

________________________________________________
| SO... MY QUESTION TO YOU IS:
|
| Do you agree or disagree that the above
| description of a 9 and 18 year old watching a
| Merry-go-round is factually accurate.. that
| the 9 year old sees it to be "twice as fast
| and twice as big" as the 18 year old? And,
| do you agree that this effect is identical
| (in principle) to the effect that a strong
| gravitational field has on an observer's
| space and time perception?
|________________________________________________

Unless you can refute this basic EQUIVALENCE
PRINCIPLE, you CANNOT refute the theory... just as
you must refute a similar "Equivalence Principle" in
order to disprove Einstein's theory. This is because
Einstein's EP leads directly to:

Gravity=G_uv

and Hammond's EP leads directly to:

God=G_uv.

they are the SAME PRINCIPLE applied to *objective*
reality by Einstein, and *subjective* reality by
Hammond! We see that in fact, Hammond's discovery
is a corrolary to Einstein's discovery.

====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================

"Wes Hall" wrote in message
news:%jFIb.23036$xX.83885@attbi_s02...
God=G_uv: Crushing Novelty Physics

Sorry for reposting this under a phoney name,
but most of the PhD's on the list already
have me killfiled under my true name and I
want to be sure this gets in their face.

... thus proving your apalling manners!

SR

The following post clearly demonstrates
that: God=G_uv
SNIP JUNK

"Wes Hall" wrote in message
news:%jFIb.23036$xX.83885@attbi_s02...
God=G_uv: Crushing Novelty Physics

SNIPPED

The Pontifical Academy of Sciences
ignored Fr. Georges Lematrie for years
until Einstein himself recognized
he was right. How much longer will
the Pontifical Academy of Sciences
ignore Hammond?


For as long as it take to *Plonk* every
fake name you come up with idiot....



SNIPPED

"Steve Ralph" wrote in message
...

"Wes Hall" wrote in message
news:%jFIb.23036$xX.83885@attbi_s02...
God=G_uv: Crushing Novelty Physics

Sorry for reposting this under a phoney name,
but most of the PhD's on the list already
have me killfiled under my true name and I
want to be sure this gets in their face.

... thus proving your apalling manners!

[Hammond]
That could be the understatement of the
21st century.

SR

The following post clearly demonstrates
that: God=G_uv

SNIP JUNK

[Hammond]
Why don't you put your expertise where your
mouth is by making a substantive physics comment...
if it's junk you should be easily able to disprove
it; instead of merely demonstrating your
"discreditable manners".
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================

"Paul R. Mays" wrote in message
...

"Wes Hall" wrote in message
news:%jFIb.23036$xX.83885@attbi_s02...
God=G_uv: Crushing Novelty Physics

SNIPPED

The Pontifical Academy of Sciences
ignored Fr. Georges Lematrie for years
until Einstein himself recognized
he was right. How much longer will
the Pontifical Academy of Sciences
ignore Hammond?


For as long as it take to *Plonk* every
fake name you come up with idiot....

[Hammond]
Your statment contains no substantive
physics commentary... that makes you
just another criminal kook Internet
harasser. The world is full of them.
90% of all NG commentary is
kook harassment by mental cases like
you.
CAN'T ANYONE TALK PHYSICS?
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================

"Wes Hall" wrote in message
news:%jFIb.23036$xX.83885@attbi_s02...
God=G_uv: Crushing Novelty Physics

Sorry for reposting this under a phoney name,
but most of the PhD's on the list already
have me killfiled under my true name and I
want to be sure this gets in their face.

**** you Hammond. You were killfiled for a reason.
Say goodby to your web site.

Wes Hall wrote:

Sorry for reposting this under a phoney name,
but most of the PhD's on the list already
have me killfiled under my true name and I
want to be sure this gets in their face.


Without commenting on the content of your
theories and web pages I think it amusing
you would bother with the "PhD's on the list"
as the most vocal of them filled up their
brains with a buncha stuff long ago and
there's no space left in them for anything
new. LOL

"Michael Varney" wrote in message
...

"Wes Hall" wrote in message
news:%jFIb.23036$xX.83885@attbi_s02...
God=G_uv: Crushing Novelty Physics

Sorry for reposting this under a phoney name,
but most of the PhD's on the list already
have me killfiled under my true name and I
want to be sure this gets in their face.

**** you Hammond. You were killfiled for a reason.
Say goodby to your web site.

[Hammond]
Hey Mickey.... You were the guy who answered
my request to talk physics with the statement:

"Sure. You go first."

If your such a wizz kid why don't you give me
just ONE SCIENTIFIC REASON why my
'equivalence principle' could be wrong? It's
clearly stated in the first post of this thread.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================

"Bill Vajk" wrote in message
news:MTHIb.245461$_M.1122513@attbi_s54...
Wes Hall wrote:

Sorry for reposting this under a phoney name,
but most of the PhD's on the list already
have me killfiled under my true name and I
want to be sure this gets in their face.


Without commenting on the content of your
theories and web pages I think it amusing
you would bother with the "PhD's on the list"
as the most vocal of them filled up their
brains with a buncha stuff long ago and
there's no space left in them for anything
new. LOL

[Hammond]
Nobody cares what the "most vocal" of them
think... what we're interested in is what the
"silent majority" thinks.
too bad you haven't anything to say about
the "content of my post". Off topic comments
are a dime a dozen... we're interested in
physics content... not cafe off topic one liners.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================