![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: each, hyperspace, inside, particle |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Ads |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
(cinquirer) wrote in message . com...
(EL) wrote in message . com... [EL] If you are sleeping in your bed, you occupy space. If you get up at night and walk to the toilet to ****, you occupy all the space between bed and the toilet over the time in which you move. That space is not the space occupied by your body at any moment but at all moments and that is why we call it a hyperspace. You do not need "chakras" as a gateway between your biological-body to that Hyperspace because if it does then you should **** all the way from bed to the toilet through your chakras and your home shall be very smelly. Got it moron? EL Hey moron. By gateway is meant the chakras are some kind of step down transformers that translate information from higher reality to the one the biological system such as brain can use (through the bioetheric body or conjugate physical). See http://www.tillerfoundation.com/science.html c No. By gateway is meant the fujikras are some kind of capacitors that store information from lower reality for the biological system such as kidneys (through the socio-kinetic form or non-Abelian chemical). See http://www.crank.net v |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Funny joke cinquirer. But let's get serious. The study of Xi can unlock
the magnetic form of the galaxy. Contemplate on the following: "Xi = patternized momentum-patterns coded into and re-forming the phlogistonic-chemical field, the psychic-phlogistonic field, the psychic and spiritual fields etc. "Xi" is the generic term, used here in preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the North corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as g'gfu, eagfij, hahre, iv or ivic force, y'i, bananna, gweik, rebellious neutrinos and electric crystal; depending on the given cone, form or frequency in which the xi occurs, it may take on various states and serve differing functions according to telepathic, social, socio-kinetic or etheric requirements. It is not the same as the phlogiston but encodes paradigm patterns of phlogiston, which, according to "strength-of-signal" and overall linearity of the latter tend to fix, regulate and preferentially adjust the algebraic sub-components of contrapted xi-forms (thus retrapting them with simulation of the guiding emotiform of the spiritual pathway imparting phlogistonic "distance" in the first place). Through the resultant focusing of emotional helixes they "percolate" to strategic epistemological "planes" reinforcing Hamiltonian metrics of intergalactic field geometries and electrocentrifugal, compact-set Lagrangians. Such xi paladigms are themselves without "shape" or "actual' velocity (i.e. with respect to galactic manifolds to the limits of decoherence) though their epistemological "distances" and "cones" integrate relative shape and respective orientation of function-particles by Lorentz transformations according to systematized pri nciples resolved from the - repeated - distortion. The Xi Geometries themselves are methodical and systematic. Therefore while they may "appear" to have control strictly "over" the institutional equations of the overall plane wave (as with SU16 x SO16 gauge group) either when socially reinstituted or subtly "controlled", they are differentially "internal" to an decoherent domain and magnitude beyond those recurrent pseudo-paradigms." |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Void wrote: Funny joke cinquirer. But let's get serious. The study of Xi can unlock the magnetic form of the galaxy. Contemplate on the following: "Xi = patternized momentum-patterns coded into and re-forming the phlogistonic-chemical field, the psychic-phlogistonic field, the psychic and spiritual fields etc. "Xi" is the generic term, used here in preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the North corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as g'gfu, eagfij, hahre, iv or ivic force, y'i, bananna, gweik, rebellious neutrinos and electric crystal; depending on the given cone, form or frequency in which the xi occurs, it may take on various states and serve differing functions according to telepathic, social, socio-kinetic or etheric requirements. It is not the same as the phlogiston but encodes paradigm patterns of phlogiston, which, according to "strength-of-signal" and overall linearity of the latter tend to fix, regulate and preferentially adjust the algebraic sub-components of contrapted xi-forms (thus retrapting them with simulation of the guiding emotiform of the spiritual pathway imparting phlogistonic "distance" in the first place). Through the resultant focusing of emotional helixes they "percolate" to strategic epistemological "planes" reinforcing Hamiltonian metrics of intergalactic field geometries and electrocentrifugal, compact-set Lagrangians. Such xi paladigms are themselves without "shape" or "actual' velocity (i.e. with respect to galactic manifolds to the limits of decoherence) though their epistemological "distances" and "cones" integrate relative shape and respective orientation of function-particles by Lorentz transformations according to systematized pri nciples resolved from the - repeated - distortion. The Xi Geometries themselves are methodical and systematic. Therefore while they may "appear" to have control strictly "over" the institutional equations of the overall plane wave (as with SU16 x SO16 gauge group) either when socially reinstituted or subtly "controlled", they are differentially "internal" to an decoherent domain and magnitude beyond those recurrent pseudo-paradigms." Total bull****. If you got paid for this on a per buzzword basis you would be a rich young man. Bob Kolker |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Xaonon wrote in message ...
Ned i bach , cinquirer teithant i thiw hin: Let me talk from actual experience. The head of humans have this vortex like gateway (called the chakras in the east) that is seen to be connected to higher space. This higher space with memory unit may be the source of the so called past lives or soul of a human being. Skilled seers can trace the pathway and directly deal in the plane (or dimension?) of the soul. Others call it Cyberspace. I call it Hyperspace for popularity sake. But I think I'd better use other term to distinguish from the above. Maybe Superspace? Hmm.. Are you really this stupid? If you would mention electromagnetic fields to a 15th century folk. You'd be called stupid too (and even get burned at the stake). Likewise with Qi & chakras (subtle energy gateways... this may be complex.. so is the biological body which some scientists believe can't exist by chance). It is 22nd century or futuristic physics. The online encyclopedia Wikipedia has more open minded approach to it. It said: "Currently, individuals investigating 'Qi' promote three differing perspectives regarding its qualities and processes: (1) that these energies exist but do not affect organic life in any way; (2) that subtle energies are a "fifth force," distinctly different from the other four standard forces; or (3) that the variations and complexities of subtle energies manifest the four forces and elements that compose all force and matter. This last perspective, if proven true, would indicate that 'Qi' is a particular expression of space at the sub-quark level. c |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert J. Kolker" wrote in message ...
cinquirer wrote: wave which our instrument and normal senses can't pick up yet such as qi. Then you are no different than witches in the 15th century who deal with potions instead of photons. How do you know qi (chi) exists if you have no way of detecting it? What phenomena of nature require qi? What are the physical and measurable characteristics of qi. How does qi relate to other forces, fields and particles? Can qi be used to produce quantitative testable predictions about the observable universe? If qi is essential, why do theories which do not have it, do as well as they do? Bob Kolker What phenomena of nature require qi? Ok. Suppose you artifically create a physical body with sufficent nutrients. The cell ATP metabolic ability is working great. There is enough glucose, oxygen and other essentials to move the cell. The brain neurons are working optimally. Is the person alive? To be alive the person need to have a "field" imparting consciousness. Consciousness is not just neuron firing separately. You need a field that controls them. See this article: http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs...909/brain.html For those of us who have more sensitivity. We can deal with this "field" directly. And it is not just in the brain but extended body wide. This field let's called bioetheric field for now. It is the home of consciousness. It interfaced to the body biochemistry thru a not yet understood quantum mechanism that doesn't require quantum coherence (remember the body and brain is noisy), maybe Bohm's quantum potential implicate. It's two way because direct inputs to your neurons or taking medicine for example can affect this field of consciousness too. This consciousness field is described in the following although it doesn't use physics term because it's not yet standardized. http://www.rickrichards.com/Chakras.htm Now what is qi. Qi is simply the energy that maintains the bioetheric field. Now what is qi and bioetheric field. It's not photonic energy but something that may function maybe beyond the quarks... such as perhaps energies in particular strings of the superstrings?? Before the physics of Qi is discovered. We must have a thorough and complete understanding of the entire field of physics from Quantum Mechanics to Relativity. Tiller is a very advanced researcher of qi in the United States. see: http://www.tillerfoundation.com/science.html His theory has Relativity components to it. However, if Relativity is misunderstood, then theories have to be made on the right foundation. That's why I'm here in this list. To know the real physics of Qi. Now if you are asking if Qi can really affect physical objects. Many experiments have been done about it. See this. http://twm.co.nz/DrYan_qi.htm http://www.accessv.com/~yuan/yansci/...Qigong_JSE.pdf c |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , cinquirer
writes See http://www.tillerfoundation.com/science.html Does anyone else think his co-author looks like Tom Potter? http://tillerfoundation.com/biography.JPG http://www.tompotter.ws/tom.gif -- Richard Herring |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert J. Kolker" wrote in message ...
The Void wrote: Funny joke cinquirer. But let's get serious. The study of Xi can unlock the magnetic form of the galaxy. Contemplate on the following: "Xi = patternized momentum-patterns coded into and re-forming the phlogistonic-chemical field, the psychic-phlogistonic field, the psychic and spiritual fields etc. "Xi" is the generic term, used here in preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the North corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as g'gfu, eagfij, hahre, iv or ivic force, y'i, bananna, gweik, rebellious neutrinos and electric crystal; depending on the given cone, form or frequency in which the xi occurs, it may take on various states and serve differing functions according to telepathic, social, socio-kinetic or etheric requirements. It is not the same as the phlogiston but encodes paradigm patterns of phlogiston, which, according to "strength-of-signal" and overall linearity of the latter tend to fix, regulate and preferentially adjust the algebraic sub-components of contrapted xi-forms (thus retrapting them with simulation of the guiding emotiform of the spiritual pathway imparting phlogistonic "distance" in the first place). Through the resultant focusing of emotional helixes they "percolate" to strategic epistemological "planes" reinforcing Hamiltonian metrics of intergalactic field geometries and electrocentrifugal, compact-set Lagrangians. Such xi paladigms are themselves without "shape" or "actual' velocity (i.e. with respect to galactic manifolds to the limits of decoherence) though their epistemological "distances" and "cones" integrate relative shape and respective orientation of function-particles by Lorentz transformations according to systematized pri nciples resolved from the - repeated - distortion. The Xi Geometries themselves are methodical and systematic. Therefore while they may "appear" to have control strictly "over" the institutional equations of the overall plane wave (as with SU16 x SO16 gauge group) either when socially reinstituted or subtly "controlled", they are differentially "internal" to an decoherent domain and magnitude beyond those recurrent pseudo-paradigms." Total bull****. If you got paid for this on a per buzzword basis you would be a rich young man. Bob Kolker I think that was the intention... A. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Richard Herring wrote: In message , cinquirer writes See http://www.tillerfoundation.com/science.html Does anyone else think his co-author looks like Tom Potter? http://tillerfoundation.com/biography.JPG http://www.tompotter.ws/tom.gif Potter's on a rampage and trying to organize an effort to "clean up" the net waves. /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT hyperspace" engine | The Ghost In The Machine | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 6th 06 03:00 PM |
| Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ??? | LEFTY | Physics - General Discussion | 39 | December 31st 05 09:02 PM |
| Hyperspace has been Revealed? | sol | Physics - General Discussion | 7 | January 1st 04 12:29 PM |
| Hyperspace inside each particle? | cinquirer | Physics - General Discussion | 31 | November 27th 03 04:19 AM |
| [] Hyperspace Quiz - & metric or not | luke | The Theory of Relativity | 4 | July 17th 03 03:32 PM |