![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: dark, energymatter, gauge, group, locally, sitter |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kaiser's paper 81JMP.pdf on his website
"Phase Space Approach to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics III" http://www.wavelets.com/vita.html#papers is of particular interest for several reasons. The Lie algebra for the 10 "charges" of the globally flat "false" Minkowski space-time vacuum's Poincare group is [Ji,Jj] = Jk [To,Kr] = Tr [Ki,Kj] = -c^-2Jk [Ji,Kj] = Kk [Ji,Tj] = Tk [Tr,Ks] = -c^-2&rsTo where i,j,k = 1,2,3 (or x,y,z in Cartesian frame of high school analytic geometry) (ijk) above in sense of cyclic permutation r,s = 1,2,3 To is total energy generating time translations in globally flat Minkowski spacetime Tk = total linear momentum generating space translations Jk are space-components of total angular momentum generating space rotations along the k space axis in the ij space plane. Kk are the Lorentz boosts between two Global Inertial Frames along the k axis in space, which, by definition, are not accelerated frames. These are space-time rotations (0,k) in Minkowski space-time. The Poincare group is a "semi-direct" product of the translation subgroup Lie algebra {To, T1,T2,T3} with the Lorentz O(1,3) subgroup Lie algebra {J1,J2,J3,K1,K2,K3}. Since the commutators across the two subgroups do not commute. Note that the Galilean limit of Newtonian mechanics is c - infinity where [Ki,Kj] = -c^-2Jk -- 0 and [Tr,Ks] = -c^-2&rsTo -- 0 Now Kibble showed (mid 1960's) that Einstein's 1915 theory of gravity without torsion fields comes from locally gauging the 4 generators {T0, T1, T2, T3}. This can be seen heuristically in the large scale L Lp limit of Hagen Kleinert's "world crystal lattice" elastic-plastic model of General Relativity. Globally flat 4D Minkowski space-time is simply a perfectly tiled lattice with unit cells at the Planck scale Lp. The symmetry of these unit cells is washed out in the large scale L Lp. The compensating gauge force fields for {T0, T1, T2, T3} are simply du(x), i.e. the distortion field of the world crystal at point x. Hagen Kleinert then shows that Einstein's 1915 theory comes from the strain tensor of the distorted world crystal guv = Minkowski metric + (1/2)[du(x),v + dv(x),u] with string defects of disclination whose large scale density is precisely Einstein's tidal force curvature tensor. The global translation group symmetry is broken, but is replaced by the Diff(4) local symmetry group. EEP is obeyed in the tetrad eu^a(x) formulation of the theory where u is in the curved base spacetime and a is in the locally almost flat tangent spacetime. "Almost" means we are far enough from a spacetime black hole singularity and larger than Lp so that tidal curvature g-force differentials and quantum gravity fluctuations are ignorable. Note, that the g-force is eliminated in LIFs on timelike geodesics, but the tidal differential curvature force from geodesic deviation is not eliminated. However, EEP only holds in the "weak curvature" non micro-quantum domain. That Einstein may not have realized this limitation on his theory in the early days is of no great consequence IMHO. I am not even sure that he did not realize it at least after 1925. I am alluding, of course, to Paul Zielinski's thesis that may be a valid footnote in the history of the emergence of Einstein's thought. If one wants a local stress energy density tensor for geometry it is simply Tuv(Geometry) = (String Tension)Guv Define the non-exotic vacuum as Tuv(matter/radiation/near EM fields) = 0 /\zpf = 0 And in that case Tuv(Geometry) = 0. However, in the exotic w = -1 "zero point energy density" dark energy/matter vacuum Tuv(Geometry) +(String Tension) /\zpfguv = 0 Metric engineering in the exotic vacuum is Tuv(Geometry)^;v =/= 0 Tuv(Geometry)^;v + /\zpf^,vguv = 0 assuming metricity and zero torsion in this simplest of cases. /\zpf = (alpha')^-1[(alpha')^3/2|Vacuum Coherence|^2 - 1] h = c = 1 convention temporarily alpha' = (String Tension)^-1 = Witten parameter There is no need for the Yilmaz theory. See below on Vacuum Coherence quieting the random chaos of the micro-quantum field vacuum zero point fluctuations. This insight is entirely missing from current string theory as well as the program of Haisch and Puthoff. In the former case we have Ed Witten admitting that the smallness of the Cosmological Constant is very serious for his M Theory. In contrast Hal Puthoff simply hand waves away the problem, which simply will not do IMHO. Kleinert does not have any connection to quantum theory in his model. I have added that. My MACRO-QUANTUM Coherent Ansatz is: du(x) = Lp^2(Goldstone Phase(x)),u ,u = partial derivative where Vacuum Coherence Field = (Higgs Amplitude Field)e^i(Goldstone Phase Field) I also have a micro-quantum "BCS" type argument why this macro local field emerges from the QED sector of quantum field theory at least as a low energy approximate effective ODLRO c-number smooth field theory. This Vacuum Coherence Field is the scalar field of inflationary cosmology in the FRW limit. The Lp^2 is consistent with Black Hole Thermodynamics of Bekenstein et-al. Back to the Lie Algebra, we see that there are non-vanishing commutators between the translation and the Lorentz subgroup algebras. Therefore, completeness and consistency (not in Godel's sense) suggest that we must also locally gauge the Lorentz group. Utiyama showed, before Kibble, that locally gauging the entire Poincare group gives a larger theory than Einstein's with the additional torsion field as the compensating gauge force field from the 6 charges {J1,J2,J3,K1,K2,K3}. The torsion field appears as an antisymmetric Diff(4) 3rd rank tensor additional piece of the connection field for parallel transport of Diff(4) tensors along world lines in curved spacetime. The De Sitter group has a curvature parameter that is really Einstein's "cosmological constant" /\ in the sense of the FRW metric. Now apparently /\ - infinity has Penrose's 15 parameter "conformal group" of massless twistors as the limit and there is a kind of string duality /\' ~ Lp^4//\ between zero and infinite cosmological constants which I suspect are at best "metastable" vacua. So the issue is additional compensating gauge force fields by locally gauging the entire Lie Algebra of the De Sitter group, which obviously will give the local /\zpf(x) unified dark energy/matter field and perhaps something extra? Where can I find the Lie algebra of the De Sitter Group fully written out? On Monday, November 17, 2003, at 09:37 PM, Tony Smith wrote: Jack, you ask: "... 4 special conformal generators ... What do they locally gauge to? My hunch is /\zpf,u ...". Yes, I think so too, and have written some stuff about it on my web page at http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmit...ngraviton.html The basic reference for that work is a paper by Aldrovandi and Pereira at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9809061 which describes in some detail how the special conformal group gives rise to cosmological "constant" type terms. My contribution, built on their nice math foundation, is to count degrees of freedom and get a result that at a critical time in the past the ratio of "matter forms" in our universe should have been: 67% Dark Energy 27% Dark Matter 6% Ordinary Matter and if you follow evolution in ways that seem reasonable to me, you get a present-day content in a range of (depending on whether Cold Dark Matter is in the form of Primordial Black Holes, or MOND, or a mixture thereof): 68-75% Dark Energy 28-21% Dark Matter 4% Ordinary Matter The observed composition by WMAP: 73% Dark Energy 23% Dark Matter 4% Ordinary Matter is between the 75-21-4 result of assuming Cold Dark Matter is made up of Primordial Black Holes, and to the 71-25-4 result of assuming that Cold Dark Matter is a (reasonable to me) mixture of Primordial Black Holes and MOND. Unfortunately from my point of view, I cannot put these results on the Cornell arXiv because I am blacklisted. It is especially unfortunate because they indicate that your model is on the right track (except that I don't like the naive form of supersymmetry that exists in superstring theory). Tony |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to measure dark energy locally in the lab with the Casimir force | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 11th 06 06:14 AM |
| Shadow Matter (E8xE8 gauge symmetry group) | p6 | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | August 11th 05 11:06 AM |
| Locally gauge the De Sitter Group for Dark Energy/Matter | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 20th 03 12:08 AM |
| Monopoles [was Dark Matter vs Dark Energy] - an EPT philosophical comment from a Bright | Peter F | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 31st 03 04:15 AM |
| magnetic monopoles vs quantization of electric charge (was: Dark Matter vs Dark Energy) | Jonathan Thornburg | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 15 | August 23rd 03 10:05 PM |