![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: aether, newbies, theories |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
A Brief Description of My Aether Theory:
1. Pure space (void) is fill with a stationary elastic ether called the E-Matrix. The E-Matrix is composed of elastic E-Strings. An E-String is 10^-35 m in diameter. The length of an E-String is not defined. The E-Strings are repulsive to each other and there is an unkonow compressive force that is compressing them together to form the E-Matrix. 2. The S-Particle is the only fundamental particle exists in the universe. The S-Particles are repulsive to the E-Strings and thus any motion of an S-Particle is maintained in the E-Matrix. The different orbiting motions of the S-Particles around the E-Strings gives rise to the different material particles---such as the electrons and quarks---in the universe. An S-Particle in a clockwise orbiting motion around an E-String gives rise to a positively charged particle such as the up-quark. An S-Particle in a counterclockwise orbiting motion around an E-String gives rise to a negatively charged particles such as the electron. The speed of the orbiting motion is the intensity of the charge. 3. All the processes of nature are the results of the orbiting S-Particles or S-Particle systems reacting to the geometry of the E-Strings or the waves in the E-Strings. 4. Motions of S-Particles or S-Particle systems in the same direction give rise to an attractive force. Motions of S-Particle or S-Particle systems in the opposite direction give rise to a repulsive force. 5. Light is composed of wave packets in neighoring E-Strings. 6. The speed of light is not a universal constant. It is a constant math ratio as follows: Light path length of rod (299,792,458 m)/the absolute time content for a clock second co-moving with the rod. 7. The physical length of a rod remains the same in all frames of reference. The light path length of a rod changes with the state of absolute motion of the rod. The higher is the state of absolute motion the longer is the light paht length. 8. The rate of a clock is dependent on the state of absolute motion of the clock. The higher is the state of absolute motion the slower is it rate. The above description of our current universe will explain all the processes of nature and it will also unify all the forces of nature. For a more detail descripiton of my ether theory please click on to the following link: http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/L...apers/Seto.pdf Also please visit my website: http://www.erinet.com/kenseto/book.html Ken Seto |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"kenseto" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... A Brief Description of My Aether Theory: skip 8. The rate of a clock is dependent on the state of absolute motion of the clock. The higher is the state of absolute motion the slower is it rate. skip Where is the origin? In my view you can only formulate, that if there is one frame and a part of it is separating (now we have two frames), e.g. a rocket, the the time in the rocket frame is dilated acc. to SR. And thats enough to explain all effects of SR. See also my other posting that was misunderstood or wanted to be misunderstood? rgds Rudi |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rudolf Drabek" wrote in message ... "kenseto" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... A Brief Description of My Aether Theory: skip 8. The rate of a clock is dependent on the state of absolute motion of the clock. The higher is the state of absolute motion the slower is it rate. skip Where is the origin? The E-Matrix (the aether) is isotropic. Therefore it is meangless to say where is the origin. In my view you can only formulate, that if there is one frame and a part of it is separating (now we have two frames), e.g. a rocket, the the time in the rocket frame is dilated acc. to SR. I don't know what you mean. Perhaps the following will help: Time dilation is not reciprocal as claimed by SR. For two observers A and B in relative motion there are two possibilities for each observer as follows: From A's point of view: Tab=Taa(Faa/Fab) ....(1) or Tab=Taa(Fab/Faa).....(2) Taa=A time interval in observer A's clock. Tab= The predicted B's clock time value for a time interval Taa (in A's frame) Faa=Frequency of a standard light source in A's frame as measured by observer A. Fab=Frequency of an identical light source in B's frame as measured by A. If Fab is not constant then use the mean value. From B's point of view: Tba=Tbb(Fbb/Fba).....(3) or Tba=Tbb(Fba/Fbb).....(4) Tbb=A time interval in observer A's clock. Tba= The predicted A's clock time value for a time interval Tbb00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000 (in B's frame) Fbb=Frequency of a standard light source in B's frame as measured by observer B. Fba=Frequency of an identical light source in A's frame as measured by B. If Fba is not constant then use the mean value. If the acceleration history of B is known then A can determine (calculates) B's clock rate using equation (1) and B can use equation (4) to determine A's clock rate. In the case of the twin, B accelerated away and return that means that B's clock is running slower then A's clock throughout B's journey and therefore equation (1) is appropriate for use to make the calculation. However if the acceleration history of B is not known then A will not know which equation to use to calculate B clock rate. This led SR to conclude that both A and B will sees each other's clock runs slow (reciprocity) and then manipulate the math later to make the answer to come out right. Ken Seto |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [B] What Newbies Need to Know About Aether Theories | EL | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 30th 03 11:57 AM |
| [B] What Newbies Need to Know About Aether Theories | kenseto | The Theory of Relativity | 41 | November 30th 03 11:57 AM |
| [C] What Newbies Need to Know About Aether Theories | kenseto | The Theory of Relativity | 2 | November 20th 03 04:05 AM |
| [E] What Newbies Need to Know About Aether Theories | kenseto | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | November 19th 03 04:40 PM |
| [D] What Newbies Need to Know About Aether Theories | kenseto | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | November 19th 03 04:39 PM |