![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: standing, still |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
What would happen if you simply stood perfectly still? If the gravity
of the Sun just didn't effect you any body that was effected by the gravity of the sun would go whizzing by at the speed the sun was traveling throughout the galaxy. Essentially if the right amount of gravity from the correct body didn't effect you, you would be dragged along an arc and you could let other planets come to you. Why go any where if you could let the destination come to you? My question is what would the equation be if you wanted to know how much gravity you wanted to "slip" by you, if you knew the Newtons of the body's gravity and the distance from that body? |
| Ads |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting though it is to play these mind games, you need to define your
parameters before you try to use them. Just like when writing computer code, you need to have a known starting value. So, standing still implies that you also know that a point exists that is not moving, and you also have a reference from some as yet unknown constant that equates to 'absolute stillness'. Presumably, this has to also be kept at below absolute zero temp to stop random motion... I often ponder the idea of sitting on a particle that is entangled with one here, but it is the very first particle at the edge of the expanding universe. I look out and still see things all around me, and ponder how this can be.... Over to you, the chaps in white coats need me to teach them how to juggle soot again.... Brian -- Brian Gaff.... graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________ __________________________________ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 06/11/03 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... On 12 Nov 2003 22:11:45 -0800, (dingogrid) wrote or quoted : What would happen if you simply stood perfectly still? Einstein said that you have to say still relative to WHAT? the sun, Sirius? When you stand perfectly still on earth, you rotate on the surface of the earth, revolve around the sun, and revolve around the galaxy, and presumably on a galactic level there is some motions too relative to other bodies. There is no concept in relativity for standing still. -- Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green. Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming. See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary. -- People are not apathetic in a bookie shop. 13th saying of Bernard |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
dingogrid wrote: What would happen if you simply stood perfectly still? You'd become stuck in time - and the Langoliers would get you. -- Barry It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC) |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Barry:
"Barry" wrote in message ... dingogrid wrote: What would happen if you simply stood perfectly still? You'd become stuck in time - and the Langoliers would get you. I was pretty sure that is what Bose-Einstein condensates did... stand perfectly still. The individual atoms of the condensate become non-localizeable, resolving into something akin to waves. David A. Smith |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roedy Green wrote: On 12 Nov 2003 22:11:45 -0800, (dingogrid) wrote or quoted : What would happen if you simply stood perfectly still? Einstein said that you have to say still relative to WHAT? the sun, Sirius? When you stand perfectly still on earth, you rotate on the surface of the earth, revolve around the sun, and revolve around the galaxy, and presumably on a galactic level there is some motions too relative to other bodies. -- Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green. Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming. See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary. how fast does our solar system revolve around our galaxy? holog |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear holog:
"holog" wrote in message ... Roedy Green wrote: On 12 Nov 2003 22:11:45 -0800, (dingogrid) wrote or quoted : What would happen if you simply stood perfectly still? Einstein said that you have to say still relative to WHAT? the sun, Sirius? When you stand perfectly still on earth, you rotate on the surface of the earth, revolve around the sun, and revolve around the galaxy, and presumably on a galactic level there is some motions too relative to other bodies. -- Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green. Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming. See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary. how fast does our solar system revolve around our galaxy? URL:http://www.chron.com/content/interac...ds/990602.html 226 million years (as determined in 1999). David A. Smith |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
dingogrid wrote: What would happen if you simply stood perfectly still? If the gravity of the Sun just didn't effect you any body that was effected by the gravity of the sun would go whizzing by at the speed the sun was traveling throughout the galaxy. Essentially if the right amount of gravity from the correct body didn't effect you, you would be dragged along an arc and you could let other planets come to you. Why go any where if you could let the destination come to you? My question is what would the equation be if you wanted to know how much gravity you wanted to "slip" by you, if you knew the Newtons of the body's gravity and the distance from that body? If Newtonian gravity didn't suddenly affect you, you would go flying off into space with the velocity that you had when gravity cut out. The rest of your posting is so weird that I would ask you to rephrase it in terms of physics, not your misconceptions of that science. John Anderon |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Representing Bound Electrons as Standing Waves | Professor Gauss | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | August 30th 04 01:37 AM |
| Standing on the shoulders of midgets... | Mitch Thompson | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | December 2nd 03 08:49 AM |
| Standing waves in coax is not FTL........................... | Mathew Orman | Physics - General Discussion | 55 | August 29th 03 05:22 AM |
| Pictures of three-dimensional standing wave patterns wanted | tj Frazir | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 25th 03 11:34 PM |
| Pictures of three-dimensional standing wave patterns wanted | John Sefton | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 25th 03 04:31 PM |