![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: constant, cosmological, puzzle, witten |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The way Ed Witten might write my basic formulae in terms of the
fundamental string parameter alpha' with h = c = 1 so that alpha' is essentially the effective Planck area inside of which we need fancy math like non-commutative "matrix" space-time, i.e. Galois extension of space-time continuum of real numbers to the hypercomplex numbers like the "fermionic" extra space dimensions of supersymmetry. The formulae below are at scales larger than effective Planck area. Einstein's geometrodynamic field = Minkowski metric + alpha' (Goldstone Phase)(,u,v) ,u are ordinary partial derivatives in 4D Goldstone Phase = arg (Vacuum Coherence) /\zpf = Exotic Vacuum Unified Dark Energy/Matter Field = (alpha')^-1[(alpha')^3/2|Vacuum Coherence|^2 - 1) /\zpf 0 is w = -1 anti-gravity exotic vacuum "dark energy" /\zpf 0 is w = -1 gravitating exotic vacuum "dark matter" which mimics w = 0 CDM for us distant observers. Vacuum Coherence = (Higgs Field)e^(Goldstone Field) O(2) symmetry implies 1D string quantized vortex core topological defects like in a Type II superconductor. On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 06:11 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: Look at "Elegant Universe" NOVA tonight. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/ Brian Greene telephoned an ET Gray on brane universe next door a millimeter away using presumably Ray Chiao's "gravity radio" transducer of off-brane world gravity waves to EM waves. ;-) Also long part on Star Gate time and space-travel. Ed Witten & Co http://superstringtheory.com/people/witten.html would be considered real kooks by the SI CSICOPS if their actual words were given to the CSICOPS without identifying who they were in a blind fold "Turing Test." The tidy classical universe of James Oberg & Co is not the Universe of Ed Witten & Co. BTW Q to Ed Witten: How can the cosmological constant be so close to zero but not zero? Ed Witten's answer: "I really don't know. It's very perplexing that astronomical observations seem to show that there is a cosmological constant. It's definitely the most troublesome, for my interests, definitely the most troublesome, observation in physics in my lifetime. In my career that is." My answer to the same question is at http://qedcorp.com/APS/StarGate1.mov PS In my theory Vacuum Coherence Field = (Higgs Amplitude Field)e^i(Goldstone Phase Field) This may correspond to locally gauging the one-parameter dilation subgroup of the 15 parameter conformal "Penrose Massless Twistor" group of space-time. I am not sure of that as yet. It does come from a dynamical instability in the Dirac electron vacuum, i.e. virtual photon exchange between virtual electrons and virtual positron "holes" near the -mc^2 Fermi surface well inside the 2mc^2 gap giving non-perturbative "Bose-Einstein" condensation of bound virtual electron-positron pairs into the complex scalar MACRO-QUANTUM local Vacuum Coherence Field. Einstein's c-number gravity field for curved space-time is then guv = (Minkowski metric)u,v + (Planck Area*)(Goldstone Phase)(,u,v) torsion potential is suv = (Planck Area*)(Goldstone Phase)[,u,v] , is ordinary partial derivative. /\ zpf = Exotic Vacuum Random Zero Point Fluctuation Field = (Planck Area*)^-1[(Planck Volume*)|Vacuum Coherence Field|^2 - 1) The strongly attractive dark matter cores of positive pressure inside the vibrating "strings" have |Vacuum Coherence Field| = 0. *Note change of sign from my earlier formulae to make the sign conventions internally consistent where, in the weak field limit Laplacian of w = -1 Exotic Vacuum Gravity Potential per unit test particle = c^2/\zpf where a negative RHS is attractive gravity of positive pressure in the more general and a positive RHS is repulsive anti-gravity of negative pressure equal but opposite in sign to the zero point fluctuation energy density, Laplacian of Gravity Potential of any "stuff" = G(Mass Density)(1 + 3w) w = Pressure/Energy Density The Vacuum Coherence Field is a function of 4 local space-time coordinates + bosonic coordinates of extra space-dimensions + fermionic matrix dimensions). Therefore the 1-dim strings vibrate in the Calabi-Yau fiber space to make the lepto-quarks and gauge force bosons. All topological defects of the complex scalar Vacuum Coherence Field with local O(2) symmetry in ordinary space time must be 1-dim strings. "Branes" mean order parameters with local symmetry larger than O(2). That is, the Vacuum Coherence Field becomes a hyper-complex number or matrix function of matrix space-time coordinates on the short scale inside the effective Planck scale Lp* ~ 1 fermi not 10^-33 cm. My toy model here is for large macro-scale primarily 10^-13 cm. The basic universal Regge slope is Ed Witten's "alpha' where Spin of hadronic resonance = alpha' (Energy)^2 + constant alpha' = G*/hc^5 Where Lp*^2 = hG*/c^3 G* ~ 10^40 G(Newton) G* = c^3Lp*^2/h alpha' = (Lp*/hc)^2 Note that the center of the quantized vibrating Type II "superconductor" string in hyperspace has Vacuum Coherence Field = 0, therefore /\zpf(string core) = - 1/Lp*^2 = - (hc)^2alpha' This, in the case of the electron, solves the problem of the Abraham-Lorentz-Becker stresses that prevent the spatially extended electron from exploding due to its self-charge internal + centrifugal repulsion. The classical space-time singularity seems to be removed as well as the need for renormalization infinities - the latter for reasons pointed out by Ed Witten & Co (e.g. April 1996 Physics Today "Reflections on the Fate of Space-Time" You can picture a bare electron either as string e^2/mc^2 ~ 1 fermi (with ends glued to 3 dim brane world) or, via complementarity, as a tiny quasi rotating charged black hole. This bare electron is surrounded by a cloud of virtual electron-positron plasma reaching out to a Compton distance ~ 137(e^2/mc^2) = h/mc. That is for low energy imaging. For high energy imaging with deep small scale probes the same electron shrinks in apparent size to ~ 10^-18 cm for current technology because of the huge micro-gravity space warping. |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When a genius commits murder (Hawking & Witten composite on Law &Order CI) | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | November 24th 04 12:01 AM |
| Cosmological Constant | davidoff404 | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | May 12th 04 09:58 PM |
| Cosmological Constant = 0 | Danny Ross Lunsford | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 0 | November 28th 03 09:48 AM |
| Is the Cosmological Constant truly non-zero? | Golam Mortuza Hossain | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | November 16th 03 12:19 PM |
| cosmological constant | Jeffery | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | September 28th 03 04:36 AM |