![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: sn1987a, symmetry |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Dishman" wrote in message
However, I too have made a mistake. The final line should say "Both angles are approximately 1 degree." instead of "slightly less than". The version showing the extremes is explicit: http://www.dishman.me.uk/George/Sola...onciled_ap.gif George George,I have enough of astronomical forensics and it has been that way for quite a while. I have one copyright going back to 1990 dealing with the geometry of stellar collapse and the symmetry generated by it.At the time there was no facility availible to accept the work and I left it to rest until the pictures of SN1987A showed up.The graphic in 1990 has two external rings and one of intersection and I am still rightly proud of how I linked it with nonperiodic geometry which is the other other graphic in that small work.To explain how they link together is an endless task and it remains a private work. While it is incontrovertible that my own work on stellar collapse proceeded the actual confirmation by about 4 years I never set out to force conclusions no more than I treat any other piece of data,to all intents and purposes my work on fivefold and icosahedral symmetry pointed in the cosmological direction and that I had the priviledge in seeing it represented in actuality was enough.Unfortunately forcing conclusions,effects and causes is all I see at the moment in science and it has been this way for well over a century,in any case I am rightly proud of my achievemnet even in the absense of interest. http://www.aip.org/physnews/graphics/images/sn1987a.jpg That's the whole joy of studying natural phenomena is that you do not force conclusions which arrive anyway with correct interpretation of data,I did it without knowing whether the observation would be confirmed or not but that is the difference between theoretical guesswork and true intuition. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Symmetry | eagleson2004123@yahoo.com | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | July 28th 04 05:01 AM |
| Why symmetry groups, not symmetry groupoids? | David Corfield | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 38 | November 12th 03 11:16 AM |
| Why symmetry groups, not symmetry groupoids? | Jason | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 193 | November 10th 03 07:52 AM |
| Re : Why symmetry groups, not symmetry groupoids? | Alfred Einstead | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 0 | October 23rd 03 10:46 PM |
| Why symmetry groups, not symmetry groupoids? | David Corfield | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 0 | September 26th 03 09:23 AM |