![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: odometer, paradox |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileans have perpetrated a massive fraud upon mankind!
Using trigonometric formulas, I calculate the distance from Los Angeles (34N, 118W) to New York City (41N, 74W) to be 3916 km or 2433 miles. But Galileans make the ridiculous claim that the distance between two cities depends on the route that you take! They say that you can NEVER drive from LA to NYC in 2433 miles. The most direct driving route, they claim, is about 2790 miles. And they claim that the distance from LA to NYC grows or shrinks depending on the route you take. For instance, Galileans say that if you drive from LA to Jacksonville, and from Jacksonville to NYC, the distance from LA to NYC expands to 3300 miles. THIS IS ABSOLUTE ABSURDITY. I SAY THAT THE DISTANCE FROM LA TO NYC IS ABSOLUTELY CONSTANT AT 2433 MILES, AND THIS DISTANCE DOES NOT GROW OR SHRINK JUST BECAUSE YOU MADE A TURN SOMEWHERE IN YOUR TRAVELS. Galileans make excuses, saying that there is a difference between "driving distance" versus "great circle distance." Their lame arguments have never made sense to me. I've challenged Galileans on this. Can they show me a peer-reviewed article in a major scientific journal demonstrating that the distance between two cities changes depending on how you drive from one to the other? Do they actually expect me to believe that the crust of the Earth expands and contracts just because of the way that I drive, and that different people simultaneously see the crust of the Earth expanding and contracting differently? Galileans always evade the issue. No Galilean has EVER shown me a peer-reviewed scientific article measuring simultaneous expansion and contraction of the Earth's crust as a result of different people's driving on the highway. They haven't shown me any such measurements to me because there aren't any. It doesn't happen. It can't happen. It's an intrinsically stupid concept. I OFFER A $1000 REWARD TO ANYBODY WHO CAN CONVINCE ME THAT THE DISTANCE BETWEEN LA AND NYC CHANGES DEPENDING ON HOW YOU DRIVE BETWEEN THE TWO CITIES. Minor Crank |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Minor Crank:
"Minor Crank" wrote in message om... Galileans have perpetrated a massive fraud upon mankind! Night of the Living Dead! You've become a zombie too! Aarrrrgggh! Happy Hallowe'en. David A. Smith |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Minor Crank" wrote in message om... Galileans have perpetrated a massive fraud upon mankind! [snip] .. I OFFER A $1000 REWARD TO ANYBODY WHO CAN CONVINCE ME THAT THE DISTANCE BETWEEN LA AND NYC CHANGES DEPENDING ON HOW YOU DRIVE BETWEEN THE TWO CITIES. Minor Crank Excellent! http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Galileans.html Your second entry :-) Dirk Vdm |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Minor Crank" wrote in message om... Galileans have perpetrated a massive fraud upon mankind! I OFFER A $1000 REWARD TO ANYBODY WHO CAN CONVINCE ME THAT THE DISTANCE BETWEEN LA AND NYC CHANGES DEPENDING ON HOW YOU DRIVE BETWEEN THE TWO CITIES. Minor Crank thats too easy... if you turn left and go the long way around its more like 36027km... pay up. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perfectly Innocent wrote:
[...] If anyone can convince you I bet it is Bilge. He is a very persuasive relativist and a cautious thinker. He is so logical, in fact, that he denies that the laws of physics imply the Lorentz transformation. See http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...ing.google.com The best part being this post from Bilge, which pointed out very good points : http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...al.net&rnum=20 You had nothing else to answer than "but... but someone else said one time that I wasn't wrong about something...". |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perfectly Innocent:
(Minor Crank) wrote in message .com... I OFFER A $1000 REWARD TO ANYBODY WHO CAN CONVINCE ME THAT THE DISTANCE BETWEEN LA AND NYC CHANGES DEPENDING ON HOW YOU DRIVE BETWEEN THE TWO CITIES. If anyone can convince you I bet it is Bilge. Heck, after seeing this post, I figured you'd ask minor crank for help in rephrasing your argument to add some logical structure to your "model". He is a very persuasive relativist and a cautious thinker. He is so logical, in fact, that he denies that the laws of physics imply the Lorentz transformation. See I see that you've studied the technique of the creationists well. You can't make a valid point, so you misconstrue the statements made against your argument. When that fails, you create your own argument using text in which those statements are taken out of context and improperly attributed as well and post it in a forum you control and only reference your argument in any public forum. When that fails, you start posting in threads that have nothing to do with what you are posting, just to get a word in. Do they teach this tactic in evangelism school? Why is it that you have so much difficulty responding to any actual objection and need to re-invent the objection so that it suits your argument? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Minor Crank:
Galileans have perpetrated a massive fraud upon mankind! You mean... There's NO alcohol in gallo wine? Are you sure that isn't spelled "galloleans"? Using trigonometric formulas, I calculate the distance from Los Angeles (34N, 118W) to New York City (41N, 74W) to be 3916 km or 2433 miles. But Galileans make the ridiculous claim that the distance between two cities depends on the route that you take! I'd say that's astounding, except that they probably drink their own stuff when driving those routes. They say that you can NEVER drive from LA to NYC in 2433 miles. The most direct driving route, they claim, is about 2790 miles. And they claim that the distance from LA to NYC grows or shrinks depending on the route you take. For instance, Galileans say that if you drive from LA to Jacksonville, and from Jacksonville to NYC, the distance from LA to NYC expands to 3300 miles. THIS IS ABSOLUTE ABSURDITY. That's probably because you've never tasted gallo wine. The galloleans are ruthless in extracting statements. [...] I OFFER A $1000 REWARD TO ANYBODY WHO CAN CONVINCE ME THAT THE DISTANCE BETWEEN LA AND NYC CHANGES DEPENDING ON HOW YOU DRIVE BETWEEN THE TWO CITIES. You're probably a marked man. Don't be surprised if someone shows up at your door holding a funnel and standing beside a barrel with the words "Vin Rose" written on it. Ask to see the wafers before opening the door. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Minor Crank" wrote in message
om... This argument is obviously a joke, it's far too clear, concise, and too the point to be a real argument from one of the crazies. You'd need to make it about 50 times as long, and have a link to your website listing the same thing, but in really big text, for anyone to take you seriously! - Jeremy |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A New SR Paradox | Constantine | The Theory of Relativity | 19 | August 22nd 03 03:17 PM |
| A New SR Paradox | kenseto | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | August 18th 03 02:57 AM |
| A New SR Paradox. | kenseto | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | July 30th 03 03:11 PM |
| A New SR Paradox. | kenseto | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | July 27th 03 02:32 PM |
| Some Paradox | Old Physics | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | June 30th 03 04:05 AM |