I ask why strings cannot be the outer coating as it were of a subparticle.
The vibrating shell of a twist of space-time. The 6 unseen dimentions
at every point in space are the twists in the fabric of prespace, and
the particles the knots of this fabric. As if in a fabric where the null lines
touch the 6 dimentions live, and the particales are the fluff balls on the
fabric. They play their tune at their frequency and mantain contact
with the fabric. At this level the strings would transform from the
vibrating rings to to a shere. What would this fundamentally change?
*
*

"Daniel Jetson" wrote in message
...
I ask why strings cannot be the outer coating as it were of a subparticle.

We don't want any more particles, thank you.

The vibrating shell of a twist of space-time. The 6 unseen dimentions
at every point in space are the twists in the fabric of prespace, and
the particles the knots of this fabric.

Where are your equations?

As if in a fabric where the null lines
touch the 6 dimentions live, and the particales are the fluff balls on the
fabric. They play their tune at their frequency and mantain contact
with the fabric. At this level the strings would transform from the
vibrating rings to to a shere. What would this fundamentally change?


Did you really say "fluff balls"? ROTFL.


--
Bonnie Granat
Granat Technical Editing and Writing
http://www.editors-writers.info

"Daniel Jetson" wrote in message
...
| I ask why strings cannot be the outer coating as it were of a subparticle.
| The vibrating shell of a twist of space-time. The 6 unseen dimentions
| at every point in space are the twists in the fabric of prespace, and
| the particles the knots of this fabric. As if in a fabric where the null
lines
| touch the 6 dimentions live, and the particales are the fluff balls on the
| fabric. They play their tune at their frequency and mantain contact
| with the fabric. At this level the strings would transform from the
| vibrating rings to to a shere. What would this fundamentally change?
|
|
|
Sales of woolly scarves?

This is just a conceptual artefact, as are most of the attempts at
describing an abstract concept in terms of our reality.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________________






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.530 / Virus Database: 325 - Release Date: 22/10/03

Hi Daniel Why can't strings be very spherical particles and their
event horizons vibrate. We can't go into a BH,and we can't go into
Planck size areas. Seems we have to just hypothesis when stuff gets to
tiny.(smaller than the smallest photon wave length) Man has trouble
with great distance measurements.and more problems with sub-microscopic
measurements..I think we need a bigger brain. Bert

Daniel Jetson wrote:
I ask why strings cannot be the outer coating as it were of a subparticle.
The vibrating shell of a twist of space-time. The 6 unseen dimentions
at every point in space are the twists in the fabric of prespace, and
the particles the knots of this fabric. As if in a fabric where the null
lines
touch the 6 dimentions live, and the particales are the fluff balls on the
fabric. They play their tune at their frequency and mantain contact
with the fabric. At this level the strings would transform from the
vibrating rings to to a shere. What would this fundamentally change?

Over the years all sorts of things were tired - vibrating blobs etc. Only
strings (and now membranes) seemed to work. Going back to a particle inside
a string does not seem to solve anything. Fluff balls (whatever they are)
might be useful if you can rigorously define what they are and
mathematically develop a theory.

Thanks
Bill

*

Brian Gaff wrote:

"Daniel Jetson" wrote in message
...
| I ask why strings cannot be the outer coating as it were of a subparticle.
| The vibrating shell of a twist of space-time. The 6 unseen dimentions
| at every point in space are the twists in the fabric of prespace, and
| the particles the knots of this fabric. As if in a fabric where the null
lines
| touch the 6 dimentions live, and the particales are the fluff balls on the
| fabric. They play their tune at their frequency and mantain contact
| with the fabric. At this level the strings would transform from the
| vibrating rings to to a shere. What would this fundamentally change?
|
|
|
Sales of woolly scarves?

This is just a conceptual artefact, as are most of the attempts at
describing an abstract concept* in terms of our reality.

And were it not for the off hand remark of a student Murray Gell-Mann
may not have come up with the quark theory.
*
*

*

Bonnie Granat wrote:

"Daniel Jetson" wrote in message
...
I ask why strings cannot be the outer coating as it were of a subparticle.

We don't want any more particles, thank you.

The vibrating shell of a twist of space-time. The 6 unseen dimentions
at every point in space are the twists in the fabric of prespace, and
the particles the knots of this fabric.

Where are your equations?

Show me yours and I'll show you mine.

*

*As if in a fabric where the null lines
touch the 6 dimentions live, and the particales are the fluff balls on the
fabric. They play their tune at their frequency and mantain contact
with the fabric. At this level the strings would transform from the
vibrating rings to to a shere. What would this fundamentally change?


Did you really say "fluff balls"? ROTFL.

--
Bonnie Granat
Granat Technical Editing and Writing
http://www.editors-writers.info

*

*

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi Daniel** Why can't strings be very spherical particles and their
event horizons vibrate.

A toroidal can tears into a sphere.

We can't go into a BH,and we can't go into
Planck size areas. Seems we have to just hypothesis when stuff gets to
tiny.(smaller than the smallest photon wave length)* Man has trouble
with great distance measurements.and more problems with sub-microscopic
measurements..I think we need a bigger brain.********* Bert

*

*

Bill Hobba wrote:

Daniel Jetson wrote:
I ask why strings cannot be the outer coating as it were of a subparticle.
The vibrating shell of a twist of space-time. The 6 unseen dimentions
at every point in space are the twists in the fabric of prespace, and
the particles the knots of this fabric. As if in a fabric where the null
lines
touch the 6 dimentions live, and the particales are the fluff balls on the
fabric. They play their tune at their frequency and mantain contact
with the fabric. At this level the strings would transform from the
vibrating rings to to a shere. What would this fundamentally change?

Over the years all sorts of things were tired - vibrating blobs etc.* Only
strings (and now membranes) seemed to work.* Going back to a particle inside
a string does not seem to solve anything.

Yet if a string can break, it has to be made of smaller parts or
it cannot break.
*

*Fluff balls (whatever they are)
might be useful if you can rigorously define what they are and
mathematically develop a theory.

Thanks
Bill

*

"Daniel Jetson" wrote in message
...


Bill Hobba wrote:

Daniel Jetson wrote:
I ask why strings cannot be the outer coating as it were of a
subparticle.
The vibrating shell of a twist of space-time. The 6 unseen dimentions
at every point in space are the twists in the fabric of prespace, and
the particles the knots of this fabric. As if in a fabric where the
null
lines
touch the 6 dimentions live, and the particales are the fluff balls on
the
fabric. They play their tune at their frequency and mantain contact
with the fabric. At this level the strings would transform from the
vibrating rings to to a shere. What would this fundamentally change?

Over the years all sorts of things were tired - vibrating blobs etc.
Only
strings (and now membranes) seemed to work. Going back to a particle
inside
a string does not seem to solve anything.

Yet if a string can break, it has to be made of smaller parts or
it cannot break.


Oh, yeah? Says who?


--
Bonnie Granat
Granat Technical Editing and Writing
http://www.editors-writers.info