![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: entity, massenergy, model, single |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
INVITATION TO EXAMINE PAPER
I have recently completed a paper entitled A SINGLE ENTITY MASS-ENERGY MODEL, that describes a model developed over several years. ABSTRACT: A model is presented that attempts to explain all matter, energy, and fields, as well as the medium in which they exist, in terms of a single type of elementary entity. A number of known and well-documented phenomena are interpreted as interactions between these entities, with the most detail given to electromagnetic phenomena, including discussion of an electromagnetic aspect to gravitation. Several other areas of currently accepted theory are briefly considered in somewhat less detail, in order to show that their interpretation in terms of a single-entity model is plausible. My work in this area has been guided by one overriding concern: that the resulting model should be less complex than any that have been proposed to date. Throughout history, every major development in science has been accompanied by a new model in which some aspect of the universe has been broken down into components that are simpler than those of the preceding model. There is no reason to think that this trend will not continue. The current state of theoretical physics has some parallels to that of astronomy prior to Copernicus. In the pre-Copernican universe, the movements of planets and other heavenly bodies were described as a complex interrelationship of spirals and rotations. The model was difficult to understand, even for an astronomer, and was quite incomprehensible to a layman. In addition, each new discovery required a refinement of the model, making it even more complex. In spite of these difficulties, astronomers of the day, who were neither incompetent nor unobservant, were able to make remarkably accurate predictions about celestial events. When the Copernican hypothesis was accepted, it did not negate previous observations regarding the relationships between the heavenly bodies, but did provide a new vantage point from which to interpret those observations. It is my hope that the single-entity model may help to initiate a similar (and perhaps necessary) shift in our present view of theoretical physics. It will become evident upon examination that my presentation of the model contains little of either the language or the mathematics of current theory. There are two reasons for this. First, if the model possesses the simplicity I had hoped for, the basic concepts and the mathematics required to describe them should be at a level that can be understood by anyone. Second, I unfortunately developed an interest in these matters about twenty years too late. At this stage of my life I have neither the time nor the opportunity to bring my background knowledge of the field up to the required level. I have, however, explored the model in considerable detail as it relates to the concepts of classical physics and to my understanding of relativity and quantum theory. The model appears to be compatible with these concepts, up to the limits of my knowledge. I now need the assistance and collaboration of someone who is comfortable with more sophisticated concepts, in order to judge whether the model continues to be compatible. I do not ask for or expect unquestioning acceptance of the model. What I do need is feedback based on the actual content of the paper, rather than on a first impression that it is beneath consideration. If you feel inclined to examine the paper, and if you have the time, the paper is available for download in pdf format at http://members.shaw.ca/rgb-bytes/sem009a.pdf (2Mb, 22 pages). If this does not work for you, please let me know and I will email the file to you. A zip file containing LaTeX dvi file and figures is also available by email, if that is more suitable. Whether or not you are able to pursue this matter further, thank you for taking the time to read this message. Sincerely, RGB |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Hawkings sigularity mass is a really possible physical entity? | newedana | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | March 31st 05 09:55 PM |
| The Hawkings sigularity mass is a really possible physical entity? | newedana | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | March 30th 05 11:56 PM |
| A single-entity unified theory | RGB | The Theory of Relativity | 2 | October 14th 03 08:19 PM |
| Does every known "entity" have either Mass or Energy? | John Tapper | Physics - General Discussion | 16 | August 19th 03 08:00 PM |
| Smart Model Proton Mass (Kg) Calculated With Comparisons To The Standard Model | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 16th 03 04:23 AM |