On page 26 I added a description of the 310c speed group wave transfer
experiment and an explanation why I am not convinced that this demonstrates
faster than c "information" transfer which would imply causality violation
according to certain frames.
http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap3.htm#BM26

(WaiteDavid137) wrote in message ...
On page 26 I added a description of the 310c speed group wave transfer
experiment and an explanation why I am not convinced that this demonstrates
faster than c "information" transfer which would imply causality violation
according to certain frames.
http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap3.htm#BM26

Wang doesn't think Einstein's causality is violated during gain
assisted light propagation.

There is a comment in the FAQ.

http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/lwan/gas.htm

Subject: 310c group wave controversy
From: (Bruce Pew)
Date: 10/26/2003 11:16 PM US Mountain Standard Time
Message-id:

(WaiteDavid137) wrote in message
...
On page 26 I added a description of the 310c speed group wave transfer
experiment and an explanation why I am not convinced that this demonstrates
faster than c "information" transfer which would imply causality violation
according to certain frames.
http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap3.htm#BM26

Wang doesn't think Einstein's causality is violated during gain
assisted light propagation.

There is a comment in the FAQ.

http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/lwan/gas.htm


Yeah, I've actually read through the FAQ at that site so I didn't think that he
in particular thought that it did. There are experimenters involved in such
experiments that dissagree. I am just giving an explanation why I am not
convinced that faster than c information has taken place even though faster
than c group wave motion has.