![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: clock, generalized, invariance, lorentz, principle, transformations |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the past few days, I have traveled to Phoenix on a business trip. While
my nuts are slowly roasting by the unusual late desert heat, my mind seems to be working very well. I was able to carry through more on the subject of time dilation which would satisfy even the most skeptics. Here you go. Please shoot as many holes in this as you are able to. - - - GENERALIZED LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS AND PRINCIPLE OF CLOCK INVARIANCE Again, as Maxwell has pointed out c^2 = 1 / (Uo Eo) in which both the permeability and the permittivity are the properties of the Aether. Here on earth, c is what it is today because of the certain value of Uo and Eo. Therefore, let's generalize into a universe where c is only constant to a local observer. Consider two frame of references --- one in frame (c' t', x', y', z' ) with local speed of light c' and time t', and the other one in (c t, x, y, z) with c and t. Frame c' sees the speed of light as c' every where even while observing frame c. Similarly, frame c also sees the speed of light as c every where even while observing frame c'. Then, Frame c' will notice it takes dt' = DL / c', for a photon to travel a distance of DL in frame c On the other hand, frame c will observe dt = DL / c, for the same photon to travel a distance of DL in frame c itself. So, DL = c' dt' = c dt, or The observer in frame c' will observe frame c with a time dilation of dt'/dt = c / c' Now, frame c' is moving away from frame c with a distance of X between each other. Then, the speed of frame c' is observed by frame c to be, dX/dt. On the other hand, the speed of frame c is observed by frame c' to be dX/dt' = (dX/dt) (dt/dt' ) = (dX/dt) (c' / c), or (dX/dt' ) / c' = (dX/dt) / c = B With these basic concepts identified, we can now go on to study the classical Morley-Michelson experiment. Feynman Lectures give a very good study of this experiment. The only thing difference applied with non-identical speed of light is the triangle that derives the time dilation. That is (c' dt' )^2 = (B c' dt' )^2 + (c dt)^2, or dt' = (c / c' ) sqrt(1 - B^2) Thus, we can follow the footsteps of Larmor, FitzGerald, and Lorentz to rewrite the Lorentz Transformations in a more generalized form which are c' dt' = (c dt + B dx) / sqrt(1 - B^2) dx' = (dx + B c dt) / sqrt(1 - B^2) dy' = dy dz' = dz, and c dt = (c' dt' - B dx' ) / sqrt(1 - B^2) dx = (dx' - B c' dt' ) / sqrt(1 - B^2) dy = dy' dz = dz' The generalized Lorentz Transformations still based on observations are also invariant. The time dilation observed by frame c' on frame c is when dx = 0. So, c' dt' = (c dt + B dx) / sqrt(1 - B^2) = c dt / sqrt(1 - B^2), or dt'/dt = (c / c' ) / sqrt(1 - B^2), just as derived from Morley-Michelson experiment. Similarly, the length contraction observed by frame c' on frame c is when dt' = 0. So, 0 = (c dt + B dx) / sqrt(1 - B^2), or dt = - B dx / c, thus dx' = (dx + B c dt) / sqrt(1 - B^2) = (dx - B c (B dx / c)) / sqrt(1 - B^2) = dx (1 - B^2) / sqrt(1 - B^2), or dx' = sqrt(1 - B^2) dx, same as the result of Morley-Michelson experiment. With these more sophisticated concepts understood, the next step is to re-derive the Minkowski Space-Time Equation based on the generalized Lorentz Transformations. We have (c' dt')^2 - dx'^2 - dy'^2 - dz'^2 = ((c dt + B dx)^2 - (dx + B c dt)^2) / (1 - B^2) - dy^2 - dz^2, or (c' dt')^2 - dx'^2 - dy'^2 - dz'^2 = (c dt)^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2 This Minkowski Space-Time Equation under the concept of Aether clearly points out that time dilation is totally delusional. It is the change in the local speed of light due to speed and/or gravity that causes this delusion of time dilation. It is the clocks which depends directly or indirectly on the speed of light that this delusion results. Applying the actual time, the delusion goes away. The different speed of light presents itself. As an observed particle moves, it distorts the Aether. Thus, its local speed of light reduces according to the Minkowski Space-Time Equation under the concept of Aether satisfying c^2 = c'^2 (1 - B^2), where c = local speed of light c' = speed of light of observing frame B = speed of frame c moving as observed from frame c' If one allows his mind to be tricked by different local speed of light, he will see a time dilation and curved space if ever more enlightened. If one does not, he will see clearly different local speed of light and no time dilation and perfectly flat Euclidean space in accordance with common sense. For example, frame c' observes an atomic clock in frame c. To read off time, an atomic clock depends on atomic resonance of individual atoms due to electromagnetism. So, fr oc 1 / sqrt(Lr Cr) oc 1 / sqrt(Uo Eo) oc c, where fr = the resonant frequency Lr = corresponding equivalence of inductance in this resonance Cr = corresponding equivalence of capacitance in this resonance Uo = permeability of free space Eo = permittivity of free space Again, any clock that depends on the speed of any mechanism or phenomenon will be affected by its local speed of light, that also includes the mechanical movements of the arms of a clock (B = v / c = invariant). All clocks built in frame c' would read the same answer if suddenly replaced in frame c. Or frame c' will always measure the same speed of light as frame c because the basic unit of time measurement depends on the speed of light itself. This is the Principle of Clock Invariance. However, frame c' can observe ?o and ?o of frame c and intelligently deduce the speed of light in frame c is accordingly c not c', and vice versa. LOCAL SPEED OF LIGHT IN VACUUM UNDER GRAVITY With the concept of the Principle of Clock Invariance well understood, we can now explore the what causes gravity, and Newton can rest in pace. Let's start with one of the most powerful equations ever discovered, the Minkowski Space-Time Equation under the concept of Aether. Observing an object in free fall, (c dt)^2 = (c' dt')^2 - (dr')^2, where c', r', t' are all observed parameters under U = 0, thus c2 (dt/dt')^2 = c'^2 - (dr'/dt')^2 As we understand the whole situation, dt/dt' = 1. So, c^2 = c'^2 - (dr'/dt')2, then 2 c (dc/dr') (dr'/dt') = - 2 (dr'/dt') (d^2r'/dt'^2) = - 2 (dr'/dt') (dU/dr'), or 2 c (dc/dr') = - 2 (dU/dr'), or 2 c dc = - 2 dU, therefore c^2 = K - 2 U, where K = integration constant At U = 0, c^2 = c'^2, therefore K = c'^2, thus c^2 = c'^2 - 2 U, or c'^2 = c^2 + 2 U, the Aether Stress Equation. This equation shows how a central object with rest mass, M, is able to stress the space around it by reducing the speed of light. This stress inflicted on the space around M is Maxwell's Aether. The Aether then allows a photon to travel at a well defined speed. This Aether is what makes all forces possible. It resides in the interstellar space and in the intergalactic space. The speed of light is the property of this Aether, and gravity is the manifestation of the Aether. The equation explaining this is dU/dr' = - (dc^2/dr') / 2, or gradient(U) = - gradient(c^2 / 2) The speed of light is stamped across every laws and theories in physics, and as explained earlier all time measurement depends on its local speed of light. Thus, this is how gravity through the speed of light would unite with all other forces. All forces would become weaker as the gravitational potential increases. At some point, gravity will become stronger than electrostatic force for example. Also under very low speed of light, matter and anti-matter can coexist comfortably. |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lorentz invariance beyond the S-matrix? | Ken S. Tucker | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 0 | February 9th 05 07:49 AM |
| Generalized Lorentz Transformation for an Accelerated Frame of Reference | Eugene Shubert | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | January 19th 05 06:46 PM |
| Generalized Lorentz Transform | RP | Physics - General Discussion | 7 | September 17th 04 06:59 PM |
| Lorentz invariance and ZPF cutoff? | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | July 4th 04 03:21 PM |
| Generalized Lorentz Transformations | Australopithecus Afarensis | The Theory of Relativity | 30 | October 22nd 03 06:43 AM |