![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: bilge |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
To Bilge, Helical wave particles which travel through the atmosphere are slowed down at a slower rate than those that are brought to a sudden stop. Consequently it takes them a longer time before they travel at approximately .6c at which point they decay into linear particles. All of the above has nothing to do with their frame of reference. As for your frame of reference Bilge, none are so blind as those who do not want to see. Len. .................................................. ... "Bilge" wrote in message ... Len Gaasenbeek: "In summary, muons that travel through the atmosphere last longer than muons that have been stopped in a detector, so that their decay times at rest can be recorded, because muons are helical wave electrons which rapidly decay into ordinary electrons when they are slowed down to the point where they no longer travel at a relativistic speed. In other words, muons are [particles] which decay more slowly in the frame in which they are moving relativistically. Precisely how does this differ from time dilation in special relativity apart from adding the irrelevant fluff about "helical wave" to particles? I could just as easily write the same sentence you wrote using "brown rectangular burfl particles". Consequently, fast moving particles do not age at a slower rate than particles that are at rest as Rossi and Hall would have us believe." That's odd. You just contradicted the sentence immediately preceeding this one. What's the deal? In other words, you can't study the lifespan of a cat if your experimental procedure requires you to kill it first before you can reliably measure whether it is alive or dead. Why not? Cats decay when they die, just like muons. The only difference is that muons can't be embalmed. In the middle ages, most women who were accused of being a witch, confessed their guilt. I give up. What did witches in the middle ages use muons for? (I am assuming they must have used them for something or else this makes less sense the first part.) If you are tortured long enough anything is better than to have to endure more pain, even the death penalty, as it will put you out of your misery without having to commit suicide. At least this way you will be a martyr who died for a cause rather than a murderer. Apart from not being very uplifting oe optimistic, I seem to be missing the point of how this fits in to a newsgroup in the sci.physics.* hierarchy. There but for the grace of God go I, but that is another subject. It was another subject several sentences ago. |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bilge, you pathetic, old fool. | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 26th 06 03:49 AM |
| SORRY Bilge ..about last POST.!! Bilge wrote:.. | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | September 22nd 05 09:58 PM |
| Dumb ole bilge | Ken S. Tucker | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | September 7th 05 02:32 PM |
| When Bilge is stumped moron bilge sends your posts to his groups alt.moron and alt. ... | Sue... | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | September 2nd 05 03:17 PM |
| stoooopid bilge | Don Giovanni | Physics - General Discussion | 34 | July 8th 05 11:54 AM |