SR posits that the speed of light is a universal constant in all inertial
frames. This is confirmed by experiments. The speed of light is
299,792,458m/1 clock second. This implies that a clock second is an interval
of universal time and that the passage of a clock second in one inertial
frame is equal to the passage of a clock second in all inertial frames. In
other words, a clock second as measured by one clock corresponds to a clock
second as measured by all the clocks in relative motion wrt it.
However, SR also claims that time is relative and that a clock second as
measured by one clock corresponds to less than a clock second as measured by
another clock in motion with respect to the first.

The above SR claims are conflicting with each other.

For the Newbies:
A way to resolve the above contradictory SR statements is as follows:
The speed of light is NOT a universal content as asserted by SR. It is a
constant math ratio in all inertial frames as follows:
Light path length of rod (299,792,458m)/the absolute time content for a
clock second co-moving with the rod.

"kenseto" wrote in message ...

What newbies need to know about Ken Seto:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...quareRoot.html
and many many many many mnay more.

Dirk Vdm

Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"kenseto" wrote in message ...

What newbies need to know about Ken Seto:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...quareRoot.html
and many many many many mnay more.

Dirk Vdm


Newbies might also enjoy what Seto has to say about himself:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ri1.erinet.com

-E

"EjP" wrote in message ...
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"kenseto" wrote in message ...

What newbies need to know about Ken Seto:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...quareRoot.html
and many many many many mnay more.

Dirk Vdm


Newbies might also enjoy what Seto has to say about himself:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ri1.erinet.com

Priceless :-)

I think I just found his very first message on Usenet on 25-Jul-1995
on bit.listserv.catholic (sic!):
http://groups.google.com/groups?&as_...i.erinet .com
It was the time of the famous KHS Publishing: "Selling booklets on
Advertising and marketing."

Then he went to sci.astro without much success... but finally
in September he got some replies on sci.physics:

There's even a reply from John Baez, imagine that!

Dirk Vdm

"EjP" wrote in message
...

Newbies might also enjoy what Seto has to say about himself:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...%244s%40eri1.e
rinet.com

Ah...the SRian runt EjP comes out swinging. Notice that when a SRian runt
have no good answer he comes out attacking.
Definition for an SRian runt:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what
he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the SRians around like a puppy and eats up their **** like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who disagrees with
SR.

Ken Seto

"kenseto" skrev i melding ...

"EjP" wrote in message
...

Newbies might also enjoy what Seto has to say about himself:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...%244s%40eri1.e
rinet.com

Ah...the SRian runt EjP comes out swinging. Notice that when a SRian runt
have no good answer he comes out attacking.

I note with interest that Ken Seto considers a pointer to a posting
written by Ken Seto to be an attack on Ken Seto.

Paul

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ...

"kenseto" skrev i melding ...

"EjP" wrote in message
...

Newbies might also enjoy what Seto has to say about himself:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ri1.erinet.com

Ah...the SRian runt EjP comes out swinging. Notice that when a SRian runt
have no good answer he comes out attacking.

I note with interest that Ken Seto considers a pointer to a posting
written by Ken Seto to be an attack on Ken Seto.

Yes. This is most certainly something newbies need to
know. Never quote a Seto to a Seto!

Dirk Vdm

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

"kenseto" skrev i melding ...

"EjP" wrote in message
...


Newbies might also enjoy what Seto has to say about himself:


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...%244s%40eri1.e
rinet.com

Ah...the SRian runt EjP comes out swinging. Notice that when a SRian runt
have no good answer he comes out attacking.


I note with interest that Ken Seto considers a pointer to a posting
written by Ken Seto to be an attack on Ken Seto.

Paul


Well, it's pretty hard to do more damage to Seto than he does to
himself. Apparently, even he sees this.

-E

EjP wrote in message ...
Paul B. Andersen wrote:

"kenseto" skrev i melding ...

"EjP" wrote in message
...


Newbies might also enjoy what Seto has to say about himself:


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ri1.erinet.com

Ah...the SRian runt EjP comes out swinging. Notice that when a SRian runt
have no good answer he comes out attacking.


I note with interest that Ken Seto considers a pointer to a posting
written by Ken Seto to be an attack on Ken Seto.

Paul


Well, it's pretty hard to do more damage to Seto than he does to
himself. Apparently, even he sees this.

-E

This is all very amusing. But if we can be serious for a minute, I
believe that I've written all the essentials for newbies to SR:

http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewforum.php?f=14

Eugene Shubert

"Perfectly Innocent" wrote in message
m...
EjP wrote in message
...
Paul B. Andersen wrote:

"kenseto" skrev i melding
...

"EjP" wrote in message
...


Newbies might also enjoy what Seto has to say about himself:



http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...a0%244s%40eri1
..erinet.com

Ah...the SRian runt EjP comes out swinging. Notice that when a SRian
runt
have no good answer he comes out attacking.


I note with interest that Ken Seto considers a pointer to a posting
written by Ken Seto to be an attack on Ken Seto.

Paul


Well, it's pretty hard to do more damage to Seto than he does to
himself. Apparently, even he sees this.

-E

This is all very amusing. But if we can be serious for a minute, I
believe that I've written all the essentials for newbies to SR:

http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewforum.php?f=14

Idiot.