|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: could, opinion, roberts, tom |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
October 4th 03
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Roberts could I have your opinion..
Tom
I posted this but it seems to have disappeared. I'm just curious what your opinion would be on what Taylor and Wheeler did wrt the following derivation. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+T...gle.com&rnum=1 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
October 6th 03
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tom Roberts could I have your opinion..
Bruce Pew wrote:
Tom I posted this but it seems to have disappeared. I'm just curious what your opinion would be on what Taylor and Wheeler did wrt the following derivation. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+T...gle.com&rnum=1 The metric being discussed had typos that changed its character. I was discussing the posted metric, not the correct one. I don't have Taylor&Wheeler's book, but assume they use the same metric as Weinberg, _Gravitation_and_Cosmology_, eq 8.2.14. It remains true that the cooridnates are invalid on the horizon, and are valid only in two disjoint regions, inside and outside. Weinberg's definition of R (his \rho, eq. 8.2.13) is invalid inside the horizon, but I'm fairly sure that could be fixed with a bit of analysis. Tom Roberts
|
|
#3
October 6th 03
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tom Roberts could I have your opinion..
Tom Roberts wrote in message ...
Bruce Pew wrote: Tom I posted this but it seems to have disappeared. I'm just curious what your opinion would be on what Taylor and Wheeler did wrt the following derivation. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+T...gle.com&rnum=1 The metric being discussed had typos that changed its character. I was discussing the posted metric, not the correct one. I don't have Taylor&Wheeler's book, but assume they use the same metric as Weinberg, _Gravitation_and_Cosmology_, eq 8.2.14. It remains true that the cooridnates are invalid on the horizon, and are valid only in two disjoint regions, inside and outside. Weinberg's definition of R (his \rho, eq. 8.2.13) is invalid inside the horizon, but I'm fairly sure that could be fixed with a bit of analysis. Tom Roberts Thanks for your comments.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Albert Einstein, Tom Roberts and Two Zombies | Pentcho Valev | Physics - General Discussion | 31 | November 21st 05 05:19 PM |
| GR-buffoon Tom Roberts: GR-nothing ..not any GR-thing.!! | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | October 23rd 05 11:01 AM |
| GR-buffoon Tom Roberts: GR-nothing ..not any GR-thing.!! | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | October 23rd 05 11:01 AM |
| Poor Tom Roberts. | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | October 13th 05 11:44 AM |
| Dr. Tom Roberts Examines the Shubertian Clock | Eugene Shubert | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | November 1st 04 12:55 AM |
Linear Mode
