![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: could, faster, gravity, light, quotchangesquot, speed, than, travel |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
............. ...Contradiction is not a sign of falsity, nor the lack of contradiction a sign of truth!!!!!!!!!!....... ... --Blaise Pascal -- Ahmed Ouahi, Architect Best Regards! "greywolf42" wrote in message ... wrote in message . .. Could "changes" in gravity travel faster than the speed of light? Setting: Our solar system with Sun which is actively fusing hydrogen, a source of neutrinos. 8000 light years away is a binary star system. One mass is about 50 solar masses and dense. The other is 70 solar masses and blue. These two are in a very tight and very Eccentric orbit with a period of 5.5 years. In the exact direction of our Sun, these two objects are eclipsing each other. Could gravity in our solar system be being varied faster than the photons can actually get to our solar system? With the only detectable effect being a change in the output of our Sun on an eleven year period? Kind of the difference between an s-wave and a p-wave, but the Pressure wave being a Tension wave. If at the big bang "space time", not mass/energy, propagated faster than light, could "changes" in space time "still" propagate faster than light? The speed of gravity could indeed be greater (different) than the speed of light. Einstein assumed that the speed of gravity was equal to the speed of light, when he developed his General Relativity. However, the only direct measurements of the speed of gravity are the perihelion advances of orbits. Mercury in this solar system, and a few stars. The measurements of Mercury are difficult, primarily due to the complexities of a time-varying 9-planet solution (even though only 4 or 5 are important in the solution), and the uncertainties in the motion of the Earth's vernal equinox. (An 'anomalous drift' in the motions of Mercury are actively removed from the data in the current GR 'verifications.') The solar system observations can thus be 'forced' to match GR. Measurements of simpler binary star systems seem to contradict the assumption in GR that v_g = c -- implying that the speed of gravity is greater than (but within a factor of 2 or 3 of) the speed of light. (DI Herculis, 1985, Guinan and Maloney) You won't see Relativists mentioning the latter study. greywolf42 ubi dubium ibi libertas |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?" | Woleb | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | January 15th 06 01:56 AM |
| "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?" | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 26th 05 02:13 AM |
| GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" .. | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | November 16th 05 03:55 PM |
| "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?" | Rettel | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | August 22nd 05 07:18 PM |