This thread will be about gravitomagnetism. Ken and I have been discussing
it and I think it's deserving of more attention.

For now - Ken - see the equations for gravitomagnetism here

http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...r/Bert4_7.html

Se Eq. (462) I 'm not sure if they're correct but it's a good place to
start. I think there is a factor of 2 missing from the curl g + &_t H = 0
equation - not sure though

Pmb

Subject: Gravitomagnetism
From: "Pmb"
Date: 9/9/2003 2:26 PM US Mountain Standard Time
Message-id:

This thread will be about gravitomagnetism. Ken and I have been discussing
it and I think it's deserving of more attention.

For now - Ken - see the equations for gravitomagnetism here

http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...r/Bert4_7.html

Se Eq. (462) I 'm not sure if they're correct but it's a good place to
start. I think there is a factor of 2 missing from the curl g + &_t H = 0
equation - not sure though



You wouldn't be. A more detailed explanation of gravitomagnetism analog of
electromagnetism is in section 2 of chapter 9 at
http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap9.htm#BM9_2

(WaiteDavid137) wrote in message ...
Subject: Gravitomagnetism
From: "Pmb"
Date: 9/9/2003 2:26 PM US Mountain Standard Time
Message-id:

This thread will be about gravitomagnetism. Ken and I have been discussing
it and I think it's deserving of more attention.

For now - Ken - see the equations for gravitomagnetism here

http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...r/Bert4_7.html

Se Eq. (462) I 'm not sure if they're correct but it's a good place to
start. I think there is a factor of 2 missing from the curl g + &_t H = 0
equation - not sure though



You wouldn't be. A more detailed explanation of gravitomagnetism analog of
electromagnetism is in section 2 of chapter 9 at
http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap9.htm#BM9_2

Warning - waite is a well known crackpot so don't pay attention to his scribblings

(WaiteDavid137) wrote in message ...
From: "Pmb"
This thread will be about gravitomagnetism. Ken and I have been discussing
it and I think it's deserving of more attention.
For now - Ken - see the equations for gravitomagnetism here
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...r/Bert4_7.html
Se Eq. (462) I 'm not sure if they're correct but it's a good place to
start. I think there is a factor of 2 missing from the curl g + &_t H = 0
equation - not sure though

You wouldn't be. A more detailed explanation of gravitomagnetism analog of
electromagnetism is in section 2 of chapter 9 at
http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap9.htm#BM9_2

Thanks Pete and David for the references.
David I enjoyed reading some of your Modern Physics site,
hope to spend more time there, ((Incidentally, the description
of your new video spells dilation incorrectly)).

Here' my question about gravitomagnetism...
Place a spinning flywheel in a box, is it possible to
determine which way the flywheel is spinning measuring
its gravititional field, outside of the box?
Regards, Ken S. Tucker.

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
om...
(WaiteDavid137) wrote in message
...
From: "Pmb"
This thread will be about gravitomagnetism. Ken and I have been
discussing
it and I think it's deserving of more attention.
For now - Ken - see the equations for gravitomagnetism here
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...r/Bert4_7.html
Se Eq. (462) I 'm not sure if they're correct but it's a good place to
start. I think there is a factor of 2 missing from the curl g + &_t H =
0
equation - not sure though

You wouldn't be. A more detailed explanation of gravitomagnetism analog
of
electromagnetism is in section 2 of chapter 9 at
http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap9.htm#BM9_2

Thanks Pete and David for the references.
David I enjoyed reading some of your Modern Physics site,
hope to spend more time there, ((Incidentally, the description
of your new video spells dilation incorrectly)).

Here' my question about gravitomagnetism...
Place a spinning flywheel in a box, is it possible to
determine which way the flywheel is spinning measuring
its gravititional field, outside of the box?

In theory? Yes. In practice? No.

Pmb

Subject: Gravitomagnetism
From: (Gauge)
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...r/Bert4_7.html

Se Eq. (462) I 'm not sure if they're correct but it's a good place to
start. I think there is a factor of 2 missing from the curl g + &_t H = 0
equation - not sure though


(WaiteDavid137)
wrote:
You wouldn't be. A more detailed explanation of gravitomagnetism analog of
electromagnetism is in section 2 of chapter 9 at
http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap9.htm#BM9_2


Warning - waite is a well known crackpot so don't pay attention to his
scribblings


All I've done there is derive exactly what comes out of relativity concerning
the matter. To argue against what is there is to argue against relativity, not
against me.