It is true.

Einsteinian relativity, which has plagued the scientific world for a century,
is about to be replaced by Wilsonian 'relative absolutism' based on the
thoroughly achieveable concept of the 'instantaneous universe'.

Wilson's sensational new method of clock synchronisation effectively enables
instantaneous communication throughout the whole universe. (see "A way to
absolutely synchronize clocks"

The method enables a hypothetical, infinite, 3D array of evenly spaced clocks
to be 'absolutely' and universally synchronized. Any clock can be used to
record the local time of any event in its immediate vicinity and then to
subsequently broadcast that information to an observer near any other clock.
This makes it possible for ALL observers, anywhere, moving or stationary, to
establish a common timing for any event.

Thus, if something happens near one particular clock at 12.00pm on 12/5/3000,
it will have also 'happened' everywhere else in the universe at exactly 12.00pm
on 12/5/3000, according to all local clocks (even though local observers might
not be aware of the fact until some later date).

As well as annihilating relativity, universally synched clocks can be used to
measure OWLS, even between relatively moving observers. The RoS is exposed as
an obvious joke that the devious Einstein played on his colleagues at the time.

Note: 'absolute synchronization' of clocks is that which might be achieved
using time signals that travel at infinite speed.



Henri Wilson.

See my animations and physics book at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

"The Editor, Science Sensations" wrote in message ...
It is true.

Einsteinian relativity, which has plagued the scientific world for a century,
is about to be replaced by Wilsonian 'relative absolutism' based on the

....fact that logic is BULL.
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...LogicBull.html

Dirk Vdm

On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:13:30 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"The Editor, Science Sensations" wrote in message ...
It is true.

Einsteinian relativity, which has plagued the scientific world for a century,
is about to be replaced by Wilsonian 'relative absolutism' based on the

...fact that logic is BULL.
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...LogicBull.html

Dirk Vdm


How sad it is to see a once intelligent man now reduced to a bumbling fumble
mumbler.

Henri Wilson.

See my animations and physics book at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

(HenriWilson) wrote in message . ..

How sad it is to see a once intelligent man now reduced to a bumbling fumble
mumbler.

You claim to have once been intelligent?

Minor Crank

"Minor Crank" wrote in message om...
(HenriWilson) wrote in message . ..

How sad it is to see a once intelligent man now reduced to a bumbling fumble
mumbler.

You claim to have once been intelligent?

In fact, the correct phrase was more like a
fiddle fluke fooling bumbling fumble mumble philosopher:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...ddleFluke.html

Dirk Vdm

On 9 Sep 2003 07:11:02 -0700, (Minor Crank) wrote:

(HenriWilson) wrote in message . ..

How sad it is to see a once intelligent man now reduced to a bumbling fumble
mumbler.

You claim to have once been intelligent?

Minor Crank

I suppose I WAS being over-generous to Dirk by labeling him 'once intelligent'.
There is no evidence of that at all. Fumbling might be his greatest achievement
for all I know.

Henri Wilson.

See my animations and physics book at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

(HenriWilson) wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 23:12:06 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

Excuse me. I was insulting YOU, not Dirk. Of course, your misunderstanding
of what I wrote is yet another proof that you can't understand what you
read.

Minor Crank


Crank it is hard to believe that either you or Dirk were ever burdened with
excess brain cells.

I have never claimed to be the smartest or most intelligent person on
these newsgroups. I read carefully what others have to say and try to
do my research before venturing an opinion. I'm reasonably versed in
SR at the "interested layman" level, enough to follow most of what is
discussed here (which is generally on a pretty basic level).

Contrast this with yourself. You claim to be an expert in multiple
physics disciplines. You claim to have discovered holes in SR, GR, and
big bang theory. You publish stupid ascii drawings backed up by
arguments that are inevitably circular and full of holes. The
alternative theories that you present all have ZERO predictive value.
Every time you are challenged to provide, say, an alternative
calculation of the correction needed for orbiting GPS clocks to remain
in sync with ground-based clocks, you have proven yourself UNABLE to
provide any such calculation.

You are a buffoon, whose main purpose on these newsgroups is to
provide entertainment to the rest of us.

Minor Crank

On 10 Sep 2003 07:26:02 -0700, (Minor Crank)
wrote:

(HenriWilson) wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 23:12:06 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

Excuse me. I was insulting YOU, not Dirk. Of course, your misunderstanding
of what I wrote is yet another proof that you can't understand what you
read.

Minor Crank


Crank it is hard to believe that either you or Dirk were ever burdened with
excess brain cells.

I have never claimed to be the smartest or most intelligent person on
these newsgroups. I read carefully what others have to say and try to
do my research before venturing an opinion. I'm reasonably versed in
SR at the "interested layman" level, enough to follow most of what is
discussed here (which is generally on a pretty basic level).

Contrast this with yourself. You claim to be an expert in multiple
physics disciplines. You claim to have discovered holes in SR, GR, and
big bang theory. You publish stupid ascii drawings backed up by
arguments that are inevitably circular and full of holes. The
alternative theories that you present all have ZERO predictive value.
Every time you are challenged to provide, say, an alternative
calculation of the correction needed for orbiting GPS clocks to remain
in sync with ground-based clocks, you have proven yourself UNABLE to
provide any such calculation.

You are a buffoon, whose main purpose on these newsgroups is to
provide entertainment to the rest of us.

Minor Crank

Sorry Crank. Didn't mean to offend.

Please read my latest thread.

Henri Wilson.

See my animations and physics book at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

"HenriWilson" wrote in message
news
Sorry Crank. Didn't mean to offend.

Please read my latest thread.

Oh, yeah. "Relativity Well and Truly Cornered"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.

Minor Crank