![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: accelerated, elektron, radiation |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My Professor used to ask this question in oral exams: What happens if
an elektron falls off from a table? Usual answer: The elektron is an accelerated charge and so it radiates elektromagnetic waves. I argued that an elektron would not radiate when accelerated by an gravitational field. The picture that guides me is the following: An elektron usually radiates because some elektromagnetic force from outside couples to the charge of an elektron but not to the elektromagnetic field generated by that elektron. The field tries to follow the charge and in order to do that it radiates. An infinite homogeneous gravitational field would accelerate the free falling elektron in the same way as it would accelerate the elektromagnetic field of the charge because gravitation does not couple to charge but energy (field- and massenergy), so an free falling elektron in an infinite homogenous gravitational field would not radiate. Another argument is, if an elektron which is accelerated by such a field would radiate for an observer on earth (let the grav. field of the earth be an infinite homogenous field in good approximation) then it would loose some Energy and the observed acceleration would be less. For a free falling observer the electron would not radiate (Imagine the observer and the elektron are locked in some dark box - then there is now way to detect the gravitational field). Then we arrive at the following paradox. The elektron would radiate in a way that the free falling observer could not see the radiation, but the observer on earth would see it (difficult to imagine if the two observers have the same time and space coordinates) and for the observer on earth the elektron falls slower then the free falling observer on the other hand for the free falling observer the position realtiv to the elektron would not change. So I am quite sure, that an accelerated elektron in a field discribed above would not radiate. Whats your opinion about this |
| Ads |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"WaiteDavid137" wrote in message ... Subject: Radiation of an accelerated elektron From: (Bastian) Date: 9/5/2003 7:36 PM US Mountain Standard Time Message-id: My Professor used to ask this question in oral exams: What happens if an elektron falls off from a table? Usual answer: The elektron is an accelerated charge and so it radiates elektromagnetic waves. I argued that an elektron would not radiate when accelerated by an gravitational field. The picture that guides me is the following: An elektron usually radiates because some elektromagnetic force from outside couples to the charge of an elektron but not to the elektromagnetic field generated by that elektron. The field tries to follow the charge and in order to do that it radiates. An infinite homogeneous gravitational field would accelerate the free falling elektron in the same way as it would accelerate the elektromagnetic field of the charge because gravitation does not couple to charge but energy (field- and massenergy), so an free falling elektron in an infinite homogenous gravitational field would not radiate. Another argument is, if an elektron which is accelerated by such a field would radiate for an observer on earth (let the grav. field of the earth be an infinite homogenous field in good approximation) then it would loose some Energy and the observed acceleration would be less. For a free falling observer the electron would not radiate (Imagine the observer and the elektron are locked in some dark box - then there is now way to detect the gravitational field). Then we arrive at the following paradox. The elektron would radiate in a way that the free falling observer could not see the radiation, but the observer on earth would see it (difficult to imagine if the two observers have the same time and space coordinates) and for the observer on earth the elektron falls slower then the free falling observer on the other hand for the free falling observer the position realtiv to the elektron would not change. So I am quite sure, that an accelerated elektron in a field discribed above would not radiate. Whats your opinion about this I am not an expert on the subject but I believe that this is a very difficult question. You might try a web search including the name Parrot for more information. Martin Hogbin |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bastian" wrote in message m... My Professor used to ask this question in oral exams: What happens if an elektron falls off from a table? Usual answer: The elektron is an accelerated charge and so it radiates elektromagnetic waves. I argued that an elektron would not radiate when accelerated by an gravitational field. Actually it will radiate. When there is a relative acceleration of charge and detector/observer, radation will be detected. Another argument is, if an elektron which is accelerated by such a field would radiate for an observer on earth (let the grav. field of the earth be an infinite homogenous field in good approximation) then it would loose some Energy and the observed acceleration would be less. That's the radiation reaction that you're refering to (aka self force). However for a constant acceleration there is no radiation reaction. For a free falling observer the electron would not radiate (Imagine the observer and the elektron are locked in some dark box - then there is now way to detect the gravitational field). Then we arrive at the following paradox. The elektron would radiate in a way that the free falling observer could not see the radiation, but the observer on earth would see it (difficult to imagine if the two observers have the same time and space coordinates) and for the observer on earth the elektron falls slower then the free falling observer on the other hand for the free falling observer the position realtiv to the elektron would not change. The detection of the radiation is observer dependant. So I am quite sure, that an accelerated elektron in a field discribed above would not radiate. Whats your opinion about this This has been studied in detail in the physics literature. You can see a summary from these various papers here http://www.geocities.com/physics_wor...ing_charge.htm Referances are included. Pmb |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Martin Hogbin" wrote in message ... "WaiteDavid137" wrote in message ... My previous posting was intended as a response to the OP (Bastian) rather than David Waite. Martin Hogbin |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pmb" wrote in message ...
"Bastian" wrote in message om... My Professor used to ask this question in oral exams: What happens if an elektron falls off from a table? Usual answer: The elektron is an accelerated charge and so it radiates elektromagnetic waves. I argued that an elektron would not radiate when accelerated by an gravitational field. I agree with you, (but I also agree with Pmb as he reconditioned the set-up). An electron accelerated by a g-field alone and in a zero electrostatic and magnetic field will not radiate. In classical terms, Maxwell's radiation equation in a vacuum is given by the tensor equation, qF_uv,w + qF_vw,u + qF_wu,v =0 where F_uv etc. are the components of the Electric and Magnetic fields, and the comma is the partial diff, and q is electronic charge. Any radiation emission or absorption would require the charge q to be subject to a varying EM field given by the components F_uv,w etc. that are relatively varying quantities. Naturally, when all the EM field components (F_uv) are zero or constant, no radiation can occur. (questions on these equations, ask). Actually it will radiate. When there is a relative acceleration of charge and detector/observer, radation will be detected. Pmb Agreed [snip] Regards Ken S. Tucker |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:48:46 -0700, Ken S. Tucker wrote:
"Pmb" wrote in message ... "Bastian" wrote in message . com... My Professor used to ask this question in oral exams: What happens if an elektron falls off from a table? Usual answer: The elektron is an accelerated charge and so it radiates elektromagnetic waves. I argued that an elektron would not radiate when accelerated by an gravitational field. I agree with you, (but I also agree with Pmb as he reconditioned the set-up). An electron accelerated by a g-field alone and in a zero electrostatic and magnetic field will not radiate. In classical terms, Maxwell's radiation equation in a vacuum is given by the tensor equation, qF_uv,w + qF_vw,u + qF_wu,v =0 where F_uv etc. are the components of the Electric and Magnetic fields, and the comma is the partial diff, and q is electronic charge. Any radiation emission or absorption would require the charge q to be subject to a varying EM field given by the components F_uv,w etc. that are relatively varying quantities. Naturally, when all the EM field components (F_uv) are zero or constant, no radiation can occur. (questions on these equations, ask). Actually it will radiate. When there is a relative acceleration of charge and detector/observer, radation will be detected. Pmb Agreed [snip] Regards Ken S. Tucker Can I ask what "relative acceleration" means? I thought in relativity that accelerations were absolute. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Titan Point" wrote in message news ![]() On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:48:46 -0700, Ken S. Tucker wrote: "Pmb" wrote in message ... "Bastian" wrote in message . com... My Professor used to ask this question in oral exams: What happens if an elektron falls off from a table? Usual answer: The elektron is an accelerated charge and so it radiates elektromagnetic waves. I argued that an elektron would not radiate when accelerated by an gravitational field. I agree with you, (but I also agree with Pmb as he reconditioned the set-up). An electron accelerated by a g-field alone and in a zero electrostatic and magnetic field will not radiate. In classical terms, Maxwell's radiation equation in a vacuum is given by the tensor equation, qF_uv,w + qF_vw,u + qF_wu,v =0 where F_uv etc. are the components of the Electric and Magnetic fields, and the comma is the partial diff, and q is electronic charge. Any radiation emission or absorption would require the charge q to be subject to a varying EM field given by the components F_uv,w etc. that are relatively varying quantities. Naturally, when all the EM field components (F_uv) are zero or constant, no radiation can occur. (questions on these equations, ask). Actually it will radiate. When there is a relative acceleration of charge and detector/observer, radation will be detected. Pmb Agreed [snip] Regards Ken S. Tucker Can I ask what "relative acceleration" means? I thought in relativity that accelerations were absolute. If you and I are both in a cabin of a rocket ship and strapped in our seats and the rocket is accelerating then there is no relative motion between you and I and thus no relative acceleration. However there is a relative acceleration between us and observers on the ground and between us and someone if free-fall Pmb |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pmb" wrote in message ...
"Titan Point" wrote in message news ![]() [snip] Can I ask what "relative acceleration" means? I thought in relativity that accelerations were absolute. If you and I are both in a cabin of a rocket ship and strapped in our seats and the rocket is accelerating then there is no relative motion between you and I and thus no relative acceleration. However there is a relative acceleration between us and observers on the ground and between us and someone in free-fall Pmb I agree completely with Pmb, however the geodesics describing this take a bit more work, and create detail. Ken S. Tucker |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge | spardr@netscape.net | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 2 | February 24th 06 01:35 AM |
| Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge | Ken S. Tucker | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | February 21st 06 10:51 PM |
| Accelerated Cosmic Expansion | Steve McGrew | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | October 29th 03 07:58 PM |
| Myth or Science? (Accelerated SR) | greywolf42 | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | August 24th 03 11:11 PM |
| Cherenkov radiation inside an atom Synchrotron Radiation intrinsic | Archimedes Plutonium | Physics - General Discussion | 8 | July 28th 03 07:16 AM |