Dwhig265:

|........|.........|.........|.........|.........| .........|.........|.......|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

I have presented some new ideas below. I offered the general idea to t
moderated forum but they weren't interested. I had misgivings about putt
here two days ago and they have been borne out. But, its the only game i
and its a shame. The why files and Dr. Neutrino were so much better. At
rate I'm going to try to ignore the insulting responses in the future. I
at least $100 to each person that is the first to convince me I'm wrong
any part of this theory.

You might as well offer $1,000,000. All of your posts have stated
that you would retract any claims if given an argument that showed
they were in error. To date, you've been given many arguments that
point out the errors in your posts, yet you have never retracted
them. If you're going to offer money, place it in escrow with a
neutral party (like paypal or something of that nature) and then
find another neutral party to decide whether you are in error.
No one will ever convince you, so your offer is nothing but
a troll.

Dwhig265:
bject: $100 reward
From: (Bilge)
Date: 9/4/03 9:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Dwhig265:

I have presented some new ideas below. I offered the general idea to t
moderated forum but they weren't interested. I had misgivings about putt
here two days ago and they have been borne out. But, its the only game i
and its a shame. The why files and Dr. Neutrino were so much better. At
rate I'm going to try to ignore the insulting responses in the future. I
at least $100 to each person that is the first to convince me I'm wrong
any part of this theory.

You might as well offer $1,000,000. All of your posts have stated
that you would retract any claims if given an argument that showed
they were in error. To date, you've been given many arguments that
point out the errors in your posts, yet you have never retracted
them.

DWH says: That Sir, is a lie. No one has EVER come close to proving me wrong
and I'm not asking for proof.

That Sir is a lie. I've proven any number of your posts wrong.

I have said I will pay at LEAST $100 because I
might pay much more for a convincing argument that would rid me of this
obsession for cosmology. I have no doubt that I have spent more time on this
subject than any person alive.
Martin Gradwell, who posts here infrequently, gave me a pretty good
argument quite a while ago, but ended up convincing himself that I might be
right. I bought him a steak dinner for his trouble.

I'm not very impressed that one kook convinced another kook of
anything.

Further, previous versions of this theory DID have errors which I found
myself from more recent observations, but no one else ever caught them.

If you're going to offer money, place it in escrow with a
neutral party (like paypal or something of that nature) and then
find another neutral party to decide whether you are in error.
No one will ever convince you, so your offer is nothing but
a troll.

DWH says: That is probably another lie because I'm pretty sure my ideas are
irrefutable.

Then how is that a lie? I said that no one would ever convince you
and you just agreed with me.

Why don't you take a chance, big mouth? Because you know I'll
make mince meat out of you, thats why!

Go back and read all of the posts I've already written. I see no
point in repeating myself. You can look those up with less effort
than I can retype them. I could do less work with better odds of
getting the $100 by panning for gold in landfill.