A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Silly Little Oblivious Pion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 8th 03 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Paul B. Andersen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,111
Default Silly Little Oblivious Pion


"kenseto" skrev i melding ...

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"kenseto" skrev i melding

...

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"kenseto" skrev i melding
...

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"kenseto" skrev i melding
...

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"Dirk Van de moortel"

skrev
i melding
...

"Danny McCarty" wrote in message
...
Subject: Silly Little Oblivious Pion
From: "kenseto"
Date: 8/31/2003 8:43 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

The same with the KTX experiment. The direction of

absolute
motion of
the
KTX apparatus was in the vertical direction wrt the
horizontal
light
rays
and thus the null result.

So by some great coincidence, we are moving through

the
aether
on
a line
perpendicular to the plane of the Earth's orbit?
Unbelievable.

Not for Seto:

http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...s/IsoVert.html


http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Vertical2.html


http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...XVertical.html

Where Ken Seto writes:
| Why is it so amazing? At every location on the surface of

the
earth
| it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction

is
| vertical.

Exploding Earth again? :-)

Ah...so your inability to comprehend is my exploding earth

theory??
I said
that the apparatus is moving vertical wrt the horizontal light

rays.

To me, it seemed like you said:
| At every location on the surface of the earth
| it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is
| vertical.

That's why I said your inability to comprehend is my exploding earth
theory. You snip out the part that you don't want to comprehend.

Here it
is
again:
"So you need to ask: why is the light rays are always horizontal

even as
the
earth is rotating? The answer is that we arbituary define that the
direction
of the light rays are horizontal at all time."

So from that we arbituary define the direction of absolute motion as
Vertical wrt the horizontal light rays. Notice again that the light

rays
are
alway defined as horizontal.

AH! I don't see it now!

When Ken Seto writes:
| At every location on the surface of the earth
| it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is
| vertical.

This statement is correct. The reason you think that it is a problem is
because you think that vertical direction is UP only. The vertical
direcxtion can be DOWN too Paul.


I see.
So the Earth is not exploding, it is crushed.


No...you don't see. One side of the earth is UP vertically then the other
side of the earth is DOWN vertically.


Ah. NOW I see.
One half is exploding while the other half is crunched.

Think of the poor devil who happens to have one leg on each half!

Paul


Ads
  #12  
Old September 8th 03 posted to sci.physics.relativity
kenseto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,004
Default Silly Little Oblivious Pion


"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"kenseto" skrev i melding

...

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"kenseto" skrev i melding

...

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"kenseto" skrev i melding
...

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"kenseto" skrev i melding
...

"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message
...

"Dirk Van de moortel"

skrev
i melding
...

"Danny McCarty" wrote in message
...
Subject: Silly Little Oblivious Pion
From: "kenseto"
Date: 8/31/2003 8:43 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

The same with the KTX experiment. The direction of

absolute
motion of
the
KTX apparatus was in the vertical direction wrt the
horizontal
light
rays
and thus the null result.

So by some great coincidence, we are moving

through
the
aether
on
a line
perpendicular to the plane of the Earth's orbit?
Unbelievable.

Not for Seto:


http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...s/IsoVert.html


http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Vertical2.html



http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...XVertical.html

Where Ken Seto writes:
| Why is it so amazing? At every location on the surface

of
the
earth
| it has one direction of absolute motion and that

direction
is
| vertical.

Exploding Earth again? :-)

Ah...so your inability to comprehend is my exploding earth

theory??
I said
that the apparatus is moving vertical wrt the horizontal

light
rays.

To me, it seemed like you said:
| At every location on the surface of the earth
| it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction

is
| vertical.

That's why I said your inability to comprehend is my exploding

earth
theory. You snip out the part that you don't want to comprehend.

Here it
is
again:
"So you need to ask: why is the light rays are always horizontal

even as
the
earth is rotating? The answer is that we arbituary define that

the
direction
of the light rays are horizontal at all time."

So from that we arbituary define the direction of absolute

motion as
Vertical wrt the horizontal light rays. Notice again that the

light
rays
are
alway defined as horizontal.

AH! I don't see it now!

When Ken Seto writes:
| At every location on the surface of the earth
| it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is
| vertical.

This statement is correct. The reason you think that it is a problem

is
because you think that vertical direction is UP only. The vertical
direcxtion can be DOWN too Paul.

I see.
So the Earth is not exploding, it is crushed.


No...you don't see. One side of the earth is UP vertically then the

other
side of the earth is DOWN vertically.


Ah. NOW I see.
One half is exploding while the other half is crunched.

Think of the poor devil who happens to have one leg on each half!


At this point I have to call you a moron. The earth is in a state of
absolute motion. If you define that the direction of absolute motion is UP
then the other side of the earth's direction of absolute motion is defined
DOWN. An observer on earth don't feel UP or DOWN.
Your childish interpretation is laughable.

Ken Seto


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Silly Little Oblivious Pion Paul B. Andersen The Theory of Relativity 58 September 11th 03 08:07 PM
Silly Little Oblivious Pion Ron Aikas The Theory of Relativity 1 August 27th 03 03:24 PM
Silly Little Oblivious Pion kenseto The Theory of Relativity 0 August 25th 03 11:22 PM
Silly Little Oblivious Pion Martin Hogbin The Theory of Relativity 0 August 25th 03 11:08 PM
Silly Little Oblivious Pion Dirk Van de moortel The Theory of Relativity 0 August 25th 03 10:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mobile Phones - Credit Card Consolidation - Myspace Layouts - Cowboy Bebop Episodes - Deutsch