![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: little, oblivious, pion, silly |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"kenseto" skrev i melding ... "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "kenseto" skrev i melding ... "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "kenseto" skrev i melding ... "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "kenseto" skrev i melding ... "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "Dirk Van de moortel" skrev i melding ... "Danny McCarty" wrote in message ... Subject: Silly Little Oblivious Pion From: "kenseto" Date: 8/31/2003 8:43 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: The same with the KTX experiment. The direction of absolute motion of the KTX apparatus was in the vertical direction wrt the horizontal light rays and thus the null result. So by some great coincidence, we are moving through the aether on a line perpendicular to the plane of the Earth's orbit? Unbelievable. Not for Seto: http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...s/IsoVert.html http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Vertical2.html http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...XVertical.html Where Ken Seto writes: | Why is it so amazing? At every location on the surface of the earth | it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is | vertical. Exploding Earth again? :-) Ah...so your inability to comprehend is my exploding earth theory?? I said that the apparatus is moving vertical wrt the horizontal light rays. To me, it seemed like you said: | At every location on the surface of the earth | it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is | vertical. That's why I said your inability to comprehend is my exploding earth theory. You snip out the part that you don't want to comprehend. Here it is again: "So you need to ask: why is the light rays are always horizontal even as the earth is rotating? The answer is that we arbituary define that the direction of the light rays are horizontal at all time." So from that we arbituary define the direction of absolute motion as Vertical wrt the horizontal light rays. Notice again that the light rays are alway defined as horizontal. AH! I don't see it now! When Ken Seto writes: | At every location on the surface of the earth | it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is | vertical. This statement is correct. The reason you think that it is a problem is because you think that vertical direction is UP only. The vertical direcxtion can be DOWN too Paul. I see. So the Earth is not exploding, it is crushed. No...you don't see. One side of the earth is UP vertically then the other side of the earth is DOWN vertically. Ah. NOW I see. One half is exploding while the other half is crunched. Think of the poor devil who happens to have one leg on each half! Paul |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "kenseto" skrev i melding ... "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "kenseto" skrev i melding ... "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "kenseto" skrev i melding ... "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "kenseto" skrev i melding ... "Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... "Dirk Van de moortel" skrev i melding ... "Danny McCarty" wrote in message ... Subject: Silly Little Oblivious Pion From: "kenseto" Date: 8/31/2003 8:43 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: The same with the KTX experiment. The direction of absolute motion of the KTX apparatus was in the vertical direction wrt the horizontal light rays and thus the null result. So by some great coincidence, we are moving through the aether on a line perpendicular to the plane of the Earth's orbit? Unbelievable. Not for Seto: http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...s/IsoVert.html http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Vertical2.html http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...XVertical.html Where Ken Seto writes: | Why is it so amazing? At every location on the surface of the earth | it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is | vertical. Exploding Earth again? :-) Ah...so your inability to comprehend is my exploding earth theory?? I said that the apparatus is moving vertical wrt the horizontal light rays. To me, it seemed like you said: | At every location on the surface of the earth | it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is | vertical. That's why I said your inability to comprehend is my exploding earth theory. You snip out the part that you don't want to comprehend. Here it is again: "So you need to ask: why is the light rays are always horizontal even as the earth is rotating? The answer is that we arbituary define that the direction of the light rays are horizontal at all time." So from that we arbituary define the direction of absolute motion as Vertical wrt the horizontal light rays. Notice again that the light rays are alway defined as horizontal. AH! I don't see it now! When Ken Seto writes: | At every location on the surface of the earth | it has one direction of absolute motion and that direction is | vertical. This statement is correct. The reason you think that it is a problem is because you think that vertical direction is UP only. The vertical direcxtion can be DOWN too Paul. I see. So the Earth is not exploding, it is crushed. No...you don't see. One side of the earth is UP vertically then the other side of the earth is DOWN vertically. Ah. NOW I see. One half is exploding while the other half is crunched. Think of the poor devil who happens to have one leg on each half! At this point I have to call you a moron. The earth is in a state of absolute motion. If you define that the direction of absolute motion is UP then the other side of the earth's direction of absolute motion is defined DOWN. An observer on earth don't feel UP or DOWN. Your childish interpretation is laughable. Ken Seto |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Silly Little Oblivious Pion | Paul B. Andersen | The Theory of Relativity | 58 | September 11th 03 08:07 PM |
| Silly Little Oblivious Pion | Ron Aikas | The Theory of Relativity | 1 | August 27th 03 03:24 PM |
| Silly Little Oblivious Pion | kenseto | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | August 25th 03 11:22 PM |
| Silly Little Oblivious Pion | Martin Hogbin | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | August 25th 03 11:08 PM |
| Silly Little Oblivious Pion | Dirk Van de moortel | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | August 25th 03 10:54 PM |