![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: neophyte, question |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Soguin wrote: I am untrained in the math of physics so the answer will need to be simple :-) If gravity is simply the shape of the space-time continum why does there need to be a graviton particle in the particle zoo? I've been trying to puzzle this one out and can't see the neccesity for that particle... As usual excellent reply from Bilge. A note to the original poster - you can trust what Bilge says. Just to flesh the graviton part out a bit. It is true that we do not have a valid complete quantum theory of gravity yet. Technically gravity it is not amenable to the formalism we use to create the quantum theory of electromagnetism called Quantum Electrodynamics. That technicality is called renormalization. But what we have is a perfectly valid 'effective field theory' of quantum gravity that works up to a certain cutoff in energy. So we have a valid quantum theory of gravity (in its domain of applicability) hence we suspect gravity is composed of gravitons. Trouble is that bloody cutoff. We would dearly love to peek beyond that. Thanks Bill |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|