A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

UFO frequency shifts



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd 03 posted to sci.skeptic,sci.physics.relativity,sci.space,sci.astro,alt.ufo.reports
Jack Sarfatti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,218
Default UFO frequency shifts


On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 04:12 AM, Bruce Cornet wrote to Jack
Sarfatti:

"Through analysis of the sounds coming from the craft, all have one
peculiar characteristic. Frequency spectrograms show the sounds to be
composed of numerous individual frequency bands, rather than a continuum
of frequencies between lower and higher frequencies. There is also an
absence of very high frequencies (white noise) when conventional jet
engine sounds are projected. The interpretation is that the sounds are
manufactured - created on what we would call a music synthesizer. Even
the jet mimic sounds appear to be replicated in that fashion.

The reversed Doppler effect is superimposed on the sound frequencies,
causing all of them to lower and rise in frequency uniformly.

Another possible explanation is that the gravitational field nulls and
amplifies frequencies in a sound to create the banding effect. I have a
difficult time accepting that possibility because it would probably
change the mix and therefore change how the sound appears to us.

The lack of white noise implies that the sound was projected from a
device (such as a speaker) that was incapable of reproducing the highest
frequencies.

Hope this helps explain why I say "synthesized". Some of the sounds
could not be those of the craft's engines, especially when the sound
attempts to duplicate conventional jet engine and propeller driven
aircraft."

Yours truly,
Bruce Cornet, Ph.D.
Prof. Geology and Botany
Raritan Valley Community College
Somerville, NJ 08876

http://www.monmouth.com/~bcornet


27 Tower Hill Ave.
Red Bank, NJ 07701
732-747-9244



As a toy model take a generic static spherically symmetric metric
without a black hole horizon since UFOs are obviously not black holes.

The differential element of curved spacetime is then of the generic form

ds^2 = - e^2phi(r)(cdt)^2 + [1 - b(r)/r]^-1dr^2 + r^2d(spherical polar
angle line element)

phi(r) is the "red shift function", b(r) is the "shape function" of the
UFO, r is the usual Schwarzschild curvature coordinate not the isotropic
radial coordinate.

Suppose we have an exotic vacuum /\zpf boundary layer of thickness d
with zero point energy density field (c^4/8piG)/\zpf with /\zpf a
constant in the thin boundary layer.

phi ~ d|/\zpf|^1/2

Assume a flat metric outside the exotic vacuum boundary layer

Therefore, the shift in proper time dtau (period of oscillation of the
signal wave) comparing signals from the exotic vacuum region /\zpf =/= 0
to the normal vacuum region /\zpf = 0 where your tape recorder is
located is

dtau (exotic vacuum)/dtau(normal vacuum) = e^2 d/\zpf^1/2

For a geometrodynamic universal red shift of all wave signals of any
physical propagating energy field from metrically engineered space-time
warping

dtau (exotic vacuum)/dtau(normal vacuum) 1 corresponding to the "dark
matter" /\zpf 0 at the bow of the UFO

On the other hand, at the stern of the UFO where we have "dark energy"
/\zpf 0 we get a universal blue shift.

Remember, the dark energy universally repels, the dark matter
universally attracts. Put the two together in the right way and you get
a net unidirectional timelike geodesic motion. Objects in the UFO are in
weightless free float, though to the outside observer the object appears
to accelerate and to traverse distances with effectively superluminal
average speed. The former was shown by Bondi and Terletskii, apparently
independently, some 40 years ago. The latter was shown by Alcubierre
about 10 years ago.

http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc





Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rayleigh light scatter - application to extra-galactic red shifts? Doug Physics - General Discussion 3 September 29th 05 02:50 PM
particle frequency and electromagnetic frequency rgiuly@yahoo.com Physics - General Discussion 7 February 21st 05 10:25 PM
Why we take the flexible breakwater response time harmonic with the frequency equal to the wave frequency in hydroelastic problems. P. Suresh Kumar Physics - General Discussion 3 February 18th 05 09:43 PM
Why we take the flexible breakwater response time harmonic with the frequency equal to the wave frequency in hydroelasticity problems. P. Suresh Kumar Physics - General Discussion 1 February 18th 05 03:25 PM
Corralling the Mass Maker: Hunting ground shifts for elusive particle Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 3 June 15th 04 01:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Naruto Shippuden Episodes - Loans - Mortgages - Comprar vivienda Denia - Wills