Dniheb21 wrote:

A:- It is a linear logic process rather than an area logic process. Any
error
along the line of logic being used can easily propagate throughout the
remaining logic chain without giving warning of its presence. (A solution
using
an area logic process, on the other hand, is similar to the solution of a
crossword or jigsaw puzzle. An error made anywhere in such a process is
revealed by an incongruity somewhere in the solution. As such, such a
logic
process is self-correcting because it forces one to go back and rethink
the
problem.)

Please define linear logic and area logic. Logic is logic.

In logic you must define your terms before reasoning with them.

Dear Bill Hobba:

"Bill Hobba" wrote in message
...
Dniheb21 wrote:
....
A:- It is a linear logic process rather than an area logic process. Any
error
along the line of logic being used can easily propagate throughout the
remaining logic chain without giving warning of its presence. (A
solution
using
an area logic process, on the other hand, is similar to the solution of
a
crossword or jigsaw puzzle. An error made anywhere in such a process is
revealed by an incongruity somewhere in the solution. As such, such a
logic
process is self-correcting because it forces one to go back and rethink
the
problem.)

Please define linear logic and area logic. Logic is logic.

In linear logic they go pretty much from the premeses to the conclusion,
pretty much following the shortest path.

In area logic, they go from the premeses, to Mr. Wittke who tells them what
common sense says, then to a different conclusion. That way he maximizes
the solution area.

In logic you must define your terms before reasoning with them.

"Reasoning", now there is something I haven't seen him do...

David A. Smith

David A. Smith wrote:
In area logic, they go from the premeses, to Mr. Wittke who tells them what
common sense says, then to a different conclusion. That way he maximizes
the solution area.


What he maximizes is the idiocy index.

Thanks
Bill