![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: apple, fall, let |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John" wrote in message ... I know this has probably been discussed many times but I still haven't found and answer I can understand. Basic question is why does an apple fall when I let go of it ? From GR's perspective, it "falls" since your hand is no longer preventing it from moving the shortest path in it's immediate (local) 4-dimensional spacetime which is distorted or curved predominately by the presence of the earth. Once released, the apple is in freefall motion which is its natural, unaffected state. If the apple were hollow, a scientifically minded bug on the inside could not tell the difference between freefall and being "at rest" or in uniform (unaccelerated) motion in some distant part of the universe free from gravitational influence. Freefall and uniform motion are straight line (geodesic) trajectories through spacetime - even if that spacetime geometry is not Euclidean or flat. Geodesics are the shortest and most efficient courses that can be traversed through a given geometry (i.e. the shortest "distance" between two points in that particular geometry - straight). Before releasing the apple your hand was constantly exerting a force on it which prevented its natural geodesic motion. You experienced this forceful interaction between hand and apple as the apple's weight. Your hand was causing a deviation in the apple's straight line natural motion in the locally curved spacetime just as the earth is doing the same with your own body. Regards |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:07:10 -0400, "Perion"
wrote: "John" wrote in message .. . I know this has probably been discussed many times but I still haven't found and answer I can understand. Basic question is why does an apple fall when I let go of it ? From GR's perspective, it "falls" since your hand is no longer preventing it from moving the shortest path in it's immediate (local) 4-dimensional spacetime which is distorted or curved predominately by the presence of the earth. Once released, the apple is in freefall motion which is its natural, unaffected state. If the apple were hollow, a scientifically minded bug on the inside could not tell the difference between freefall and being "at rest" or in uniform (unaccelerated) motion in some distant part of the universe free from gravitational influence. Freefall and uniform motion are straight line (geodesic) trajectories through spacetime - even if that spacetime geometry is not Euclidean or flat. Geodesics are the shortest and most efficient courses that can be traversed through a given geometry (i.e. the shortest "distance" between two points in that particular geometry - straight). Before releasing the apple your hand was constantly exerting a force on it which prevented its natural geodesic motion. You experienced this forceful interaction between hand and apple as the apple's weight. Your hand was causing a deviation in the apple's straight line natural motion in the locally curved spacetime just as the earth is doing the same with your own body. What natural motion and where did it come from ? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
John wrote:
:[snip] : What natural motion and where did it come from ? Inertial motion, which all objects do if not accelerated. To get a good feel for General Relativity, forget a lot of the Newtonian terminology and concepts and think of the Divergent Matter model of gravitation where the Earth is expanding with an acceleration of all points on the surface away from it's center of mass. Don't worry about the math or consequences of the model, just think of what the apple would do if you are accelerating upward and you let go of it. It continues with the same velocity upward that it attained before you let go of it, and you continue to be accelerated upward by the ground. Don't consider taking the model any further, it requires a completely different physics, where size changes and time slows, and motion is not the same as in Newtonian physics and Euclidean space. Einstein got an idea like this in 1907, and wrote more about it in 1911, and continued the idea in 1915 with more emphasis on inertial motion rather than on accelerated motion and the cause of the proper acceleration of the Earth's surface upward. He could not have presented any concept like the Earth expanding, they would have put him in an institution. But you can appreciate the concept of General Relativity by just thinking of the ground accelerating upward. Joe Fischer -- 3 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is the universe going to fall apart ? | Skybuck Flying | Physics - General Discussion | 50 | September 21st 05 05:10 PM |
| Free-fall | Jared | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | December 7th 03 08:55 PM |
| Rate of free fall vs Acceleration of free fall | Donald G. Shead | Physics - General Discussion | 34 | September 21st 03 05:01 AM |
| Why does an apple fall when I let go of it ? | tx6 | The Theory of Relativity | 5 | August 23rd 03 04:46 PM |
| - Free Fall - | =^.^= | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | July 13th 03 05:02 AM |