![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: parallel, universes |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
PS Look at Max Tegmark's Parallel Universes in May 2003 Scientific
American for background. Imagine a single Level 1 post inflationary bubble which (suppress 1 space dimension temporarily) is like an infinite flat rubber sheet Euclidian plane that is not only stretching isotropicly, but is accelerating in its expansion rate. Our local universe is the interior of an expanding circle on the plane. The radius of the circle is c/H(t). The circumference of the circle is "singular" in the sense that the vacuum coherence PSI = 0 on the circumference where the micro incoherent -- macro quantum coherent vacuum inflationary phase transition happened. That is, the circumference is analogous to a vortex line in Type II superconductor with a lattice of vortex lines. Each vortex line is analogous to a "local" Level I parallel universe. Now in fact, we live in flat 3D space (in large scale structure limit), so the circumference is really the 2D surface of the World Hologram of Lenny Susskind where Lp* = Lp^2/3(c/Ho)^1/3 ~ 1 fermi i.e. lepto-quark scale of physics. On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 01:25 PM, ISEP wrote: Timothy Ferris on C-Span LA TIMES Book Fair Seduction of Science Ferris is a good writer, though not a physicist, he has a good understanding of the conventional wisdom in mainstream physics today. John Archibald Wheeler asked at April 2003 APS in Philadelphia "The Question is: What is The Question?" Ferris describes the wrong question asked by all of the pundits in modern precision cosmology, which is "What are the exotic particles, perhaps from string theory, that form the dark matter?" This is an important issue because, as Ferris was quick to point out, contrary to John Maddox's (NATURE) comment, inflationary cosmology is an excellent theory since 3D space is now measured to be flat on the large scale 10 megaparsecs and the black body cosmic microwave background temperature variations ~ 10^-5 over the whole celestial sphere with scale invariant Gaussian fluctuations are now, since WMAP, measured with good accuracy and precision ~ 2%. Quantum field theory has both virtual and real particles. In simple terms, real particles outside the physical vacuum obey the exterior Heisenberg uncertainty principle that, for example, the product of the momentum and position uncertainties is greater than a quantity proportional to Planck's quantum of action. Similarly, for energy and time, for action momentum and angle, for number and phase, electric and magnetic fields, generalized to any pair of incompatible non-commuting matrix observables in quantum bit space etc. Virtual particles, on the contrary, are inside the vacuum, obeying the interior Heisenberg uncertainty principle that the products of uncertainties in conflicting measurements is smaller than the corresponding action quantity for real particles. There are two kinds of physical vacuum spacetime regions, exotic and non-exotic. The non-exotic vacuum does not gravitate and it is close to the common sense idea of a vacuum as classical empty of real particles (including real photons forming radiation, and even giant quantum states of virtual photons forming near fields like magnetic fields in MHD plasmas, in pulsars etc.). The nonexotic vacuum on the large scale has zero cosmological constant /\ = 0. Gravity lensing, type 1a supernovae, WMAP et-al all show that the physical vacuum on a large scale is only about 4% in terms of the "Omega" of standard FRW cosmology from Einstein's theory of gravity. Our expanding 3D space is accelerating rather than slowing down. This means, from type 1s supernovae data, a /\ 0 that is an anti-gravity space warp field with an Omega that is ~ 73%. Flat 3D space then requires a dark matter component whose Omega is ~ 23%. The three main components of the stuff of our local universe then adds up to 100% with ordinary atoms and radiation in non-gravitating vacuum only ~ 4% of the universe. Our "local universe" is what we can see in our telescopes in all regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. That will include future gravity wave and neutrino detectors as well. That is, our local universe the "past light cone" in curved spacetime on the large scale. There are an infinity of parallel universes outside our past light cone. Indeed, one needs to use Cantor's theory of transfinite numbers with an infinity of infinities as explained by Max Tegmark in several recent papers like May 2003 Scientific American on "Parallel Universes". These universes are geometrodynamical in the sense of Wheeler's "IT" not the same as David Deutsch's informational " BIT "multiverse" ("Fabric of Reality"). Wheeler says "IT FROM BIT" which requires delving into the alternative meanings of quantum theory. I suggest Wheeler's idea is incomplete needing also "BIT FROM IT" to get his Oroborus of the "universe as a self-excited circuit". http://www.metanexus.net/ultimate_reality/agenda.htm Einstein's large scale cosmological constant is really a limiting case of the local complex scalar field responsible for inflation. The Dirac electron vacuum dominates to a good approximation but it is unstable from the exchange of a virtual photon between a virtual electron-positron pair at the Fermi surface of zero energy with momentum 10^19Gev/c. The micro-quantum Dirac vacuum collapses to a macro-quantum coherent vacuum of lower entropy. The local complex scalar field is the vacuum polarization coherence. The coherence length is c/H(t) where the Hubble parameter is H(t) = R(t),t/R(t) in the large scale limit of the GRW metric including /\ =/= 0. This local scalar field PSI(x) has a Goldstone phase and a Higgs amplitude. Einstein's geometrodynamic c-number field guv(x) of "superfluid" curved spacetime is simply emergent from the modulation of the Goldstone phase according to the IT FROM BIT Bohm pilot wave guidance equation guv(x) = nuv + (1/2)Lp^2 (Goldstone phase(x))9{,u,v} , means ordinary partial derivative, { }means symmetrized anti-commutator and [ ] means commutator nuv is the globally flat Minkowski metric tensor Lp^2 = hG/c^3 consistent with black hole thermodynamics. Torsion fields correspond to the non-integrable anholonomy (Goldstone phase(x))[,u,v] =/= 0 Susskind's "world hologram" corresponds to using Lp* = Lp^2/3(c/Ho)^1/3 ~ 1 fermi ~ 10^-13 cm rather than Lp ~ 10^-33 cm The local exotic vacuum zero point energy fluctuation field is then /\(x)zpf = Lp*^-2[1 - Lp*^3|Higgs Amplitude(x)|^2] where /\(x) 0 is anti-gravitating "dark energy" exotic vacuum and /\(x) 0 is gravitating "dark matter" exotic vacuum. The zero point energy induced electron rest mass is m~ (e^2/c^2)|/\zpf|^1/2 where |/\zpf |~ (1 fermi)^-2 ~ Lp*^-2 on the scale of 1 fermi with /\zpf 0 dark matter exotic vacuum core to prevent the explosion of the self charge ~ e. The string theory alpha' corresponds to this same value for /\zpf on the microscale. * Therefore, dark matter is not in the form of real exotic particles. Dark matter ~ 23% of the stuff of our local universe is simply exotic vacuum with positive zero point energy pressure. In contrast, dark energy ~ 73% of our local universe is simply exotic vacuum with negative zero point energy pressure that is equivalent to Kip Thorne's "exotic matter" for traversable wormholes and Alcubierre timelike geodesic warp drive vacuum propulsion when we learn how to locally metric engineer the physical vacuum. Potential applications of this new physics are described in Chapter Nine of Sir Martin Rees's "Our Final Hour". Jack Sarfatti http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How 2 travel between parallel universes | marsrules | Physics - General Discussion | 53 | June 16th 04 04:12 AM |
| Parallel universes proven by Quantum Computers | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | June 4th 04 08:37 PM |
| parallel universes | Sirius Black | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | February 2nd 04 06:43 PM |
| Parallel Universes | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | August 21st 03 12:11 AM |