The following link decribes a correct aether theory. This theory gives rise
to a new theory of gravity. It unites gravity with the other forces. It
explains action at a distance. It includes SR, GR and QM as subsets. In
addtion a proposed experiment capable of detecting the existence of this
aether is included.
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/L...apers/Seto.pdf


Ken Seto

"Robert J. Kolker" wrote in message
...


kenseto wrote:

The following link decribes a correct aether theory. This theory gives
rise
to a new theory of gravity. It unites gravity with the other forces. It
explains action at a distance. It includes SR, GR and QM as subsets. In
addtion a proposed experiment capable of detecting the existence of
this
aether is included.
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/L...apers/Seto.pdf


Using your Revolutionary New Theory do the following

Does the Standard Model do the following? If not why do I have to deduce
them from my theory? However, my theory does provide an explanation for all
of them.

Ken Seto


1. Deduce the parity violation in the weak force discovered by Yang, Lee
and Wu

2. Deduce the value of the fine structure constant.

3. Deduce the existence of netrinos.

4. Deduce the gravitational constant.

Do it in full, complete and rigourously, and spare no details in your
proof.

Bob Kolker

"kenseto" wrote in message
...

"Robert J. Kolker" wrote in message
...


kenseto wrote:

The following link decribes a correct aether theory. This theory gives
rise
to a new theory of gravity. It unites gravity with the other forces.
It
explains action at a distance. It includes SR, GR and QM as subsets.
In
addtion a proposed experiment capable of detecting the existence of
this
aether is included.
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/L...apers/Seto.pdf


Using your Revolutionary New Theory do the following

Does the Standard Model do the following? If not why do I have to deduce
them from my theory? However, my theory does provide an explanation for
all
of them.

Then show your work, or be branded a pompous idiot.

Minor Crank

"David Evens" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 03:03:40 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

Then show your work, or be branded a pompous idiot.

Actually, it's "Show your work, or be demonstrated a pompous idiot
(again)."

What am I going to do with this branding iron, then?

Minor Crank

"Minor Crank" wrote in message news:4OH0b.154317$cF.56173@rwcrnsc53...
"David Evens" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 03:03:40 GMT, "Minor Crank"
wrote:

Then show your work, or be branded a pompous idiot.

Actually, it's "Show your work, or be demonstrated a pompous idiot
(again)."

What am I going to do with this branding iron, then?

Minor Crank

Clean Seto's flesh [from branding iron nook and cranny] left over from last time.