John Anderson wrote in message ...
Old Physics wrote:

Orbital Resonances

The mean solar day loses about 630 seconds over the lunar siderial
period (LSP) every million years, the LSP loses about 400s. The
difference is about 230s/MYr.
This means that there were 27.5 msds/lsp 66.5 MYrs ago, 28 at 250
MYrs ago, 28.5 433MYrs ago and 29 617 MYrs ago. These correspond to
the mass extinctions at the end of the Creteceous, Permian, Ordovicean
and Precambrian respectively.
What caused these resonances?

Please show why this question has anything to do with relativityexcept
that Newtonian gravity is a limit of GR.

If you can't, then your posting is off-topic.

John Anderson

Siderial orbital resonances would be evidence of directionality.
Directionality would be evidence that the universe is anisotropic,
something that good physicists and cosmologists like yourself do not
accept.
I should have written "What caused these sidereal resonances"?
The dates are a bit fuzzy depending on whether it is done by
calculation or a fixed 183 million year interval between resonances.
The rotational planes of the sun, gas planets, giminga, the crab
pulsar, the precursor of the helix nebula, sag A, etc. all point in
the same cosmic direction, toward 11h 40m 36s rt asn.
If the ailiner experiment is carried out and validates relativity,
I will agree that my hypothesis that space has an infinite euclidean
geometry is off topic and downright wrong.
You are top notch in the field of physics, Dr. Anderson, thank you
for your post.

Respectfully,
stephen kearney

Orbital Resonances

The mean solar day loses about 630 seconds over the lunar siderial
period (LSP) every million years, the LSP loses about 400s. The
difference is about 230s/MYr.
This means that there were 27.5 msds/lsp 66.5 MYrs ago, 28 at 250
MYrs ago, 28.5 433MYrs ago and 29 617 MYrs ago. These correspond to
the mass extinctions at the end of the Creteceous, Permian, Ordovicean
and Precambrian respectively.
What caused these resonances?

Please show why this question has anything to do with relativityexcept
that Newtonian gravity is a limit of GR.

If you can't, then your posting is off-topic.

John Anderson

Siderial orbital resonances would be evidence of directionality.
Directionality would be evidence that the universe is anisotropic,
something that good physicists and cosmologists like yourself do not
accept.
I should have written "What caused these sidereal resonances"?
The dates are a bit fuzzy depending on whether it is done by
calculation or a fixed 183 million year interval between resonances.
The rotational planes of the sun, gas planets, giminga, the crab
pulsar, the precursor of the helix nebula, sag A, etc. all point in
the same cosmic direction, toward 11h 40m 36s rt asn.
If the ailiner experiment is carried out and validates relativity,
I will agree that my hypothesis that space has an infinite euclidean
geometry is off topic and downright wrong.
You are top notch in the field of physics, Dr. Anderson, thank you
for your post.

Respectfully,
stephen kearney

Do I take that as a "no comment" John.

Old Physics wrote:

John Anderson wrote in message ...
Old Physics wrote:

Orbital Resonances

The mean solar day loses about 630 seconds over the lunar siderial
period (LSP) every million years, the LSP loses about 400s. The
difference is about 230s/MYr.
This means that there were 27.5 msds/lsp 66.5 MYrs ago, 28 at 250
MYrs ago, 28.5 433MYrs ago and 29 617 MYrs ago. These correspond to
the mass extinctions at the end of the Creteceous, Permian, Ordovicean
and Precambrian respectively.
What caused these resonances?

Please show why this question has anything to do with relativityexcept
that Newtonian gravity is a limit of GR.

If you can't, then your posting is off-topic.

John Anderson

Siderial orbital resonances would be evidence of directionality.
Directionality would be evidence that the universe is anisotropic,
something that good physicists and cosmologists like yourself do not
accept.

No, it's evidence that the universe in the neighborhood of the sunis anisotropic. It doesn't imply
that the whole thing is.

Most of us already know that the universe is locally anisotropic.

John Anderson

Old Physics wrote:

Orbital Resonances

The mean solar day loses about 630 seconds over the lunar siderial
period (LSP) every million years, the LSP loses about 400s. The
difference is about 230s/MYr.
This means that there were 27.5 msds/lsp 66.5 MYrs ago, 28 at 250
MYrs ago, 28.5 433MYrs ago and 29 617 MYrs ago. These correspond to
the mass extinctions at the end of the Creteceous, Permian, Ordovicean
and Precambrian respectively.
What caused these resonances?

Please show why this question has anything to do with relativityexcept
that Newtonian gravity is a limit of GR.

If you can't, then your posting is off-topic.

John Anderson

Siderial orbital resonances would be evidence of directionality.
Directionality would be evidence that the universe is anisotropic,
something that good physicists and cosmologists like yourself do not
accept.
I should have written "What caused these sidereal resonances"?
The dates are a bit fuzzy depending on whether it is done by
calculation or a fixed 183 million year interval between resonances.
The rotational planes of the sun, gas planets, giminga, the crab
pulsar, the precursor of the helix nebula, sag A, etc. all point in
the same cosmic direction, toward 11h 40m 36s rt asn.
If the ailiner experiment is carried out and validates relativity,
I will agree that my hypothesis that space has an infinite euclidean
geometry is off topic and downright wrong.
You are top notch in the field of physics, Dr. Anderson, thank you
for your post.

Respectfully,
stephen kearney

Do I take that as a "no comment" John.

No. I did comment on this, although it wasafter you posted this self serving
reply
to my posting.

I have better things to do than work to a
time clock to reply to cranks in this group.

Implying that I have no reply because I
haven't replied yet is dishonest.

John Anderson

John Anderson wrote in message ...
Old Physics wrote:

John Anderson wrote in message ...
Old Physics wrote:

Orbital Resonances

The mean solar day loses about 630 seconds over the lunar siderial
period (LSP) every million years, the LSP loses about 400s. The
difference is about 230s/MYr.
This means that there were 27.5 msds/lsp 66.5 MYrs ago, 28 at 250
MYrs ago, 28.5 433MYrs ago and 29 617 MYrs ago. These correspond to
the mass extinctions at the end of the Creteceous, Permian, Ordovicean
and Precambrian respectively.
What caused these resonances?

Please show why this question has anything to do with relativityexcept
that Newtonian gravity is a limit of GR.

If you can't, then your posting is off-topic.

John Anderson

Siderial orbital resonances would be evidence of directionality.
Directionality would be evidence that the universe is anisotropic,
something that good physicists and cosmologists like yourself do not
accept.

No, it's evidence that the universe in the neighborhood of the sun is anisotropic. It doesn't imply
that the whole thing is.

Most of us already know that the universe is locally anisotropic.

John Anderson

I have a friend who is a physicist, works at an accelerator, and
says that he would not me surprised if there were a time difference
between the atomic clocks in the airliner experiment (fly six hours
toward a pole of the CMB, wait six hours and make the return trip in
the same cosmic direction, compare atomic clocks with a second flight
that takes off about twelve hours later).
He thinks my theory is garbage, he dosn't actually say so, but I
can tell by the laughter.
Do you think that our locally anisotropic universe could show polar
effects in other ways besides the evidence of the CMB?
If time slows down more towards leo, the warm pole and the
direction (blue shifted) we are supposedly going, my SUper Dense
Aether, SUDRA theory, is a total crok. Sudra requires that the cold
pole is caused by higher absolute velocity gas and dust, that is time
dilated and radiates longer wavelengths.

Stephen Kearney

Old Physics wrote:

Orbital Resonances

The mean solar day loses about 630 seconds over the lunar siderial
period (LSP) every million years, the LSP loses about 400s. The
difference is about 230s/MYr.
This means that there were 27.5 msds/lsp 66.5 MYrs ago, 28 at 250
MYrs ago, 28.5 433MYrs ago and 29 617 MYrs ago. These correspond to
the mass extinctions at the end of the Creteceous, Permian, Ordovicean
and Precambrian respectively.
What caused these resonances?

Please show why this question has anything to do with relativityexcept
that Newtonian gravity is a limit of GR.

If you can't, then your posting is off-topic.

John Anderson

Siderial orbital resonances would be evidence of directionality.
Directionality would be evidence that the universe is anisotropic,
something that good physicists and cosmologists like yourself do not
accept.

No, it's evidence that the universe in the neighborhood of the sun is anisotropic. It doesn't imply
that the whole thing is.

Most of us already know that the universe is locally anisotropic.

John Anderson

I have a friend who is a physicist, works at an accelerator, and
says that he would not me surprised if there were a time difference
between the atomic clocks in the airliner experiment (fly six hours
toward a pole of the CMB, wait six hours and make the return trip in
the same cosmic direction, compare atomic clocks with a second flight
that takes off about twelve hours later).
He thinks my theory is garbage, he dosn't actually say so, but I
can tell by the laughter.
Do you think that our locally anisotropic universe could show polar
effects in other ways besides the evidence of the CMB?
If time slows down more towards leo, the warm pole and the
direction (blue shifted) we are supposedly going, my SUper Dense
Aether, SUDRA theory, is a total crok. Sudra requires that the cold
pole is caused by higher absolute velocity gas and dust, that is time
dilated and radiates longer wavelengths.


You just asked a different question from the one that I originally answered.Unless you want to connect the
two questions, I'm not biting. I don't
respond to people who keep changing the subject.

John Anderson

John,

You wrote that "it" (orbital resonances) would only be evidence of
a local anisotropy which is already known. I asked if there could be
other effects besides the doppler shift in the CMB. It is a relavent,
related question.

Stephen Kearney