If the photoelectric effect is the only concept which can support the
hypothesis of the existence of the "Photon", then I've very Advanced
concept with in the Boundaries of Maxwell's concept of Light which is
quite compatible with the concept of the Bending of the light, Black
Holes and Photoelectric effect.


Photon:

- Photon is the carrier of the electromagnetic radiation,
- Photon has zero Mass,
- Bending of the Light is due to the Gravitational force of the near by
Heavenly bodies,
(Rebuttal): Photon has Zero mass, then how come it is getting attracted
to that force?
- Geometry of the spacetime is Curved( for others it is Torsion )
so Light is following that trajectory.

At the end for the bending of Light there are 2 hypothesis..,
1.Gravitational force of the near by heavenly bodies,
2.Geometry of the spacetime.


Black Holes:

If the Light is not escaping from a heavenly body, then we would
called it as a Black hole.
(Rebuttal): If the Photon has zero mass then, how could the
heavenly body attracts the light so intensively.


with a single sweep now the Photon is going to be smashed. Lets see..,


= Light is a EM wave - Faraday & Maxwell- Faraday Rotation.

= (a) Bending of the Light in spacetime is not due to the
gravitational force of the heavenly bodies,

(b) At least Light is not following the trajectory(Curved or Torsion)
of the spacetime.



then, how to explain the above 3 phenomenon, Assuming that Light as a EM
wave.
_____

You have to agree with me that a rotating heavenly body produces a
Magnetic field and therefore a rotating Magnetic field produces an
Electric field
proof:- (a) Ask your magnetic Compass needle, why it is always
pointing in *One* direction when suspended freely.
(b) Faraday's concepts of rotating motors.




Now the stage is set ready...to explain

why

(a) Bending of the Light,
(b) Black holes &
(c) Photoelectric effect.


Light Bending:


Bending of the Light is due to the attractive and repulsive
forces between the Light's and the respective heavenly body's Electric
and Magnetics fields.


Black Hole:


If the field strength of that heavenly body is so *HUGE* then
Light would not escape from its boundary region.



Photoelectric effect:


Ejecting of the electrons from a metal's surface is not the job
of a photon,

Jumping of those loose electrons from their respective orbitals is
caused by the attractive and repulsive forces between the Electron's
electric and magnetic field with the Light's electric and magnetic
field.


At the end there is no need of Photons any more.


Any sarcasm..?

On Jul 3, 10:09*am, "M.Parker" wrote:
If the photoelectric effect is the only concept which can support the
hypothesis of the existence of the "Photon" [...]

It isn't. Get an education.

Dear M.Parker:

"M.Parker" wrote in message
...
If the photoelectric effect is the only concept
which can support the hypothesis of the
existence of the "Photon", then I've very
Advanced concept with in the Boundaries
of Maxwell's concept of Light which is
quite compatible with the concept of the
Bending of the light, Black Holes and
Photoelectric effect.

Maxwell cannot do photoelectric effect.

....
Any sarcasm..?

Yes. Chekc your pockets and the surfaces near you for some
relevance. You seem to have none.

David A. Smith

"M.Parker" wrote:

If the photoelectric effect is the only concept which can support the
hypothesis of the existence of the "Photon",
[snip crap]

Pair formation, photon counting, light pressure, single molecule
fluorescence, optical isotope separation, lasers, plasmon excitation,
electroluminescence, positronium annihalation, nuclear
photofragmentation, hydrogen hyperfine transition...

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

M.Parker wrote on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:09:54 +0000:

If the photoelectric effect is the only concept which can support the
hypothesis of the existence of the "Photon",

Is not.

then I've very Advanced
concept with in the Boundaries of Maxwell's concept of Light which is
quite compatible with the concept of the Bending of the light, Black
Holes and Photoelectric effect.

Nonsense.


Photon:

- Photon is the carrier of the electromagnetic radiation,

Hum

- Photon has zero Mass,

- Bending of the Light is due to the Gravitational force of the near by
Heavenly bodies,
(Rebuttal): Photon has Zero mass, then how come it is getting attracted
to that force?

Simple, because its EMT is non-zero. Using photon EMT gives the observed
light bending.

(...)


--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/

On Jul 3, 3:20*pm, Uncle Al wrote:
"M.Parker" wrote:

If the photoelectric effect is the only concept which can support the
hypothesis of the existence of the "Photon",

[snip crap]

Pair formation, photon counting, light pressure, single molecule
fluorescence, optical isotope separation, lasers, plasmon excitation,
electroluminescence, positronium annihalation, nuclear
photofragmentation, hydrogen hyperfine transition... * * *

--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
*(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Al, you left out atomic spectroscopy. Not much, I know, but
historically it is the basis of quantum mechanics.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

"M.Parker" wrote in message
...
If the photoelectric effect is the only concept which can support the
hypothesis of the existence of the "Photon", then I've very Advanced
concept with in the Boundaries of Maxwell's concept of Light which is
quite compatible with the concept of the Bending of the light, Black
Holes and Photoelectric effect.


Photon:

- Photon is the carrier of the electromagnetic radiation,
- Photon has zero Mass,
- Bending of the Light is due to the Gravitational force of the near by
Heavenly bodies,
(Rebuttal): Photon has Zero mass, then how come it is getting attracted
to that force?
- Geometry of the spacetime is Curved( for others it is Torsion )
so Light is following that trajectory.

At the end for the bending of Light there are 2 hypothesis..,
1.Gravitational force of the near by heavenly bodies,
2.Geometry of the spacetime.


Black Holes:

If the Light is not escaping from a heavenly body, then we would
called it as a Black hole.
(Rebuttal): If the Photon has zero mass then, how could the
heavenly body attracts the light so intensively.


with a single sweep now the Photon is going to be smashed. Lets see..,


= Light is a EM wave - Faraday & Maxwell- Faraday Rotation.

= (a) Bending of the Light in spacetime is not due to the
gravitational force of the heavenly bodies,

(b) At least Light is not following the trajectory(Curved or Torsion)
of the spacetime.



then, how to explain the above 3 phenomenon, Assuming that Light as a EM
wave.
_____

You have to agree with me that a rotating heavenly body produces a
Magnetic field and therefore a rotating Magnetic field produces an
Electric field
proof:- (a) Ask your magnetic Compass needle, why it is always
pointing in *One* direction when suspended freely.
(b) Faraday's concepts of rotating motors.




Now the stage is set ready...to explain

why

(a) Bending of the Light,
(b) Black holes &
(c) Photoelectric effect.


Light Bending:


Bending of the Light is due to the attractive and repulsive
forces between the Light's and the respective heavenly body's Electric
and Magnetics fields.


Black Hole:


If the field strength of that heavenly body is so *HUGE* then
Light would not escape from its boundary region.



Photoelectric effect:


Ejecting of the electrons from a metal's surface is not the job
of a photon,

Jumping of those loose electrons from their respective orbitals is
caused by the attractive and repulsive forces between the Electron's
electric and magnetic field with the Light's electric and magnetic
field.


At the end there is no need of Photons any more.


Any sarcasm..?

http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/gu...s/coriolis.mov
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...ro/Crapiro.htm

If spacetime is curved, is the curvature convex or concave?
Any clue?

--------- ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha... --------

"M.Parker" wrote in message
...
Eureka: Light is Demystified
I've ....[said nothing new]
Any sarcasm..?

hanson wrote:
.... ahahahahaha.... Parki-pooh, if you'd had paid attention in
high school, there would be nothing mystifying about Light.

But you have come to the right place, s.p., where a gang of
idiots, morons and fanatics, from uncle rect-Al, at the bottom,
to your namesake John Parker Andorcles at the top, are trying
to rewrite physics as we know it. Then there are the hordes of
Einstein Dingleberries, led by Tom Roberts & Bilge=Doug=Dono
who dunno, because for them physics stopped between 1905
and 1916.... ahahaha...

So, repost your tripe and a whole bunch of them will land on your
fly paper and try to convince you with buzzwords that you are an
idiot.. ... No sarcasm! But thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson,

On Jul 3, 1:26*pm, "Androcles" wrote:
[...]

If spacetime is curved, is the curvature convex or concave?
Any clue?

According to the works of Douglas Adams. spacetime is not merely
curved but is instead positively twisted. He was the first to
explain the observation of Comte Mede de Sivrac of France that the
average gravitational gradient over any closed path was a positive
nonzero value.

"MooseFET" wrote in message
...
[...]

http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/gu...s/coriolis.mov
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...ro/Crapiro.htm

If spacetime is curved, is the curvature convex or concave?
Any clue?