![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: universe, vortex |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Ng
I've developed a model of the universe, I call the vortex universe. It is based on relativity and a quoternionic form of an imaginary spacetime. That has three imaginary axis and a real scalar of time. The scalar part is created by the multiplication of three rotations to an imaginary sphere. Since that spacetime is an antisymmetric multiplicative space, any point has an orientation that behaves timelike. Actually only this orientation 'moves', but the points stay. We observe this as a plethora of patterns, since the relations are fractal on a length scale. This means, we observe not spacetime itself, but perform a Wick rotation and base our observation on ourselfs and perceive these patterns in respect to us. This turns the imaginary spacetime into real observations and makes time imaginary and space real. These imaginary rotations show up as sine waves in space. Space is there a definition: that imaginary direction, where these rotations show up as light. Light follows this space by definition and gets curved upon the presence of mass. This fractal behavior generates a vortex, that stems from the increase of rotational helices that spiral around each other and add spiral to spiral, if we make the borders of a system wider. We could now turn this vortex into other directions by moving or accelerating, or simply by imagining to be somewhere else. I think, we can see this kind of behavior on various phenomena. One example is a comet pacing through the solar wind. This comet accelerates the solar wind by dragging a shadow behind. We could see water vapor in this tail and see radiation. Both is actually the solar wind plasma accelerated and behaves both as matter and as radiation. The kind of multiplication I'm not sure about, but think of something like the wedge product. Comments? Thomas Heger |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thomheg" wrote in message ... Hi Ng I've developed a model of the universe, I call the vortex universe. Whoopee... yawn |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 23, 10:13*pm, thomheg wrote:
Hi Ng I've developed a model of the universe, I call the vortex universe. It is based on relativity and a quoternionic form of an imaginary spacetime. That has three imaginary axis and a real scalar of time. The scalar part is created by the multiplication of three rotations to an imaginary sphere. Since that spacetime is an antisymmetric multiplicative space, any point has an orientation that behaves timelike. Actually only this orientation 'moves', but the points stay. We observe this as a plethora of patterns, since the relations are fractal on a length scale. This means, we observe not spacetime itself, but perform a Wick rotation and base our observation on ourselfs and perceive these patterns in respect to us. This turns the imaginary spacetime into real observations and makes time imaginary and space real. These imaginary rotations show up as sine waves in space. Space is there a definition: that imaginary direction, where these rotations show up as light. Light follows this space by definition and gets curved upon the presence of mass. This fractal behavior generates a vortex, that stems from the increase of rotational helices that spiral around each other and add spiral to spiral, if we make the borders of a system wider. We could now turn this vortex into other directions by moving or accelerating, or simply by imagining to be somewhere else. I think, we can see this kind of behavior on various phenomena. One example is a comet pacing through the solar wind. This comet accelerates the solar wind by dragging a shadow behind. We could see water vapor in this tail and see radiation. Both is actually the solar wind plasma accelerated and behaves both as matter and as radiation. The kind of multiplication I'm not sure about, but think of something like the wedge product. Comments? Thomas Heger You've confused mindless babbling with a model of the universe. A common error amoungst the mentally ill. Paul Cardinale |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vortex ram | Michael Press | Physics - New Theories | 0 | December 20th 07 08:03 AM |
| Vortex ram | DougC[_2_] | Physics - New Theories | 1 | December 5th 07 06:52 AM |
| Vortex ram | Werehatrack | Physics - New Theories | 0 | December 5th 07 02:34 AM |
| A Vortex inside a Vortex--- Forget Vortex Theory For Now What AboutThe Loss Of The Funny Beer Commercials? | nightbat | Physics - New Theories | 3 | September 29th 04 06:48 PM |
| A Vortex inside a Vortex--- Forget Vortex Theory For Now What AboutThe Loss Of The Funny Beer Commercials? | nightbat | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | September 19th 04 09:14 AM |